SRL Archive - Discussions and Debates

http://villavu.com/forum/showthread.php?t=106229 whoever is voting yes on these obvious no applications can you please take voting somewhat seriously? Everyone is 'entitled' to their own vote but it's annoying when people even apply without a script and I still see a 'troll' yes vote or 2 (http://villavu.com/forum/showthread.php?t=106225) (http://villavu.com/forum/showthread.php?t=103306)

Who knows, maybe people want more srl members? :)

first app is a bad example, since his script was pretty good for a first one.

Why are you pointing to Cage's applicaton? I voted yes, because I think his scrpt is fine enougth, I've also seen this guy on IRC. Well, last 2 guys are obv trolls, but why you mixed them up with this guy, I have no idea.

From: bg5
Why are you pointing to Cage's applicaton? I voted yes, because I think his scrpt is fine enougth, I've also seen this guy on IRC. Well, last 2 guys are obv trolls, but why you mixed them up with this guy, I have no idea.

This lol.

Who cares how people vote.

It's not your vote. :I

From: NKN
Who cares how people vote.

It's not your vote. :I

This ^ even though voted no.

@Officer Barbrady

You are within your right to vote no on an application as well as explaining why you voted no. Seeing that you haven't explained your vote on Cage's app yet, maybe you could do that instead of this. I'm sure he'll appreciate the feedback, and it's more useful than threads like this. :)

I almost voted yes for cage, its a pretty solid app just doesn't have the activity I was looking for… not sure why you said those yes votes were troll.

Anyway, the troll votes really only happen when there is no chance they will make it not on actual candidates. Don't stress yourself over it, its been happening even when I became an SRL member (Long long ago…)

I had voted yes for Cage, despite the result favouring the other way. I do it for encouragement.

Just like Daniel said, how do you know that they are 'troll' votes for yes @Officer Barbrady;? You always assume you know everything when most of the time you are wrong.

EG: Cage's application, Daniel voted Yes for encouragement, not to be a troll. Please, take a look at what you are posting before you do it.
EG: When you use to get -rep, you would go on Skype and accuse a user (from memory you would normally accuse @xtrapsp; when in fact, brad even said himself it wasn't him and I was able to vouch that it wasn't!)

From: Justin
Just like Daniel said, how do you know that they are 'troll' votes for yes @Officer Barbrady;? You always assume you know everything when most of the time you are wrong.

EG: Cage's application, Daniel voted Yes for encouragement, not to be a troll. Please, take a look at what you are posting before you do it.
EG: When you use to get -rep, you would go on Skype and accuse a user (from memory you would normally accuse @xtrapsp; when in fact, brad even said himself it wasn't him and I was able to vouch that it wasn't!)

why are you mentioning even xtrapsp?

I apologize for thinking that cage's yes votes were trolls.

From: Officer Barbrady
why are you mentioning even xtrapsp?

I apologize for thinking that cage's yes votes were trolls.

Why did I mention @xtrapsp;? So he knows he has been spoken about in this thread and he can back me up if you try to deny it.

From: Justin
Why did I mention @xtrapsp;? So he knows he has been spoken about in this thread and he can back me up if you try to deny it.

I don't understand why you are bringing that up it's completely off topic..

From: Officer Barbrady
I don't understand why you are bringing that up it's completely off topic..

The rest of my post is relevant to the thread. It was just another example of when you assumed you knew what you were on about but you were wrong, as you state in the OP with the "I still see a 'troll' yes vote or 2", you are wrong. You are assuming that the Yes votes are 'troll' votes, I was just re-enforcing the fact that you aren't always correct.

Please, if you have an issue my post(s), I'll be more then happy to take this to a PM.

Praise the lord you little human!, grow something!, not been on the forums in like 2 months and you're still blabbing about me. Am I that important to you? Do you want my something slapping your chin or something? Get the out newb.

> Inb4warningbutlolIdgaf

From: xtrapsp
Praise the lord you little human!, grow something!, not been on the forums in like 2 months and you're still blabbing about me. Am I that important to you? Do you want my something slapping your chin or something? Get the out newb.

> Inb4warningbutlolIdgaf

I'm not babbling about you -.-

I find it annoying to the point of it being a peeve to see some of the backseat modding you do, Barbara. I have never voted in a poll, but I think that if somebody wants to troll a yes, they have my high 5 of approval. What's a random yes or no going to do besides mess with your menstrual cycle? Get off your high horse.

EDIT: Also, a yes on any application brings a smile. On my first app I had 2 yes and I think 8 no's. If I hadn't gotten the yes votes, I would probably have taken a lot longer to put in an application out of discouragement from not having any approval. Who knows, I may start voting now- do I have your blessing?

From: Wu-Tang Clan


EDIT: Also, a yes on any application brings a smile. On my first app I had 2 yes and I think 8 no's. If I hadn't gotten the yes votes, I would probably have taken a lot longer to put in an application out of discouragement from not having any approval. Who knows, I may start voting now- do I have your blessing?

If someone has something as an attempt, that shows they tried, I am going to put a yes vote in. If you try and get all "NO" you kind of loose heart for a while. I agree that the people that have one post, and say something like "Uber scripz in the workz" applications should never have any yes votes…

From: EtherFreak
If someone has something as an attempt, that shows they tried, I am going to put a yes vote in. If you try and get all "NO" you kind of loose heart for a while. I agree that the people that have one post, and say something like "Uber scripz in the workz" applications should never have any yes votes…

While I do agree with that about people with 1 post, there are still other scripts that might only be using simple object finding methods and not TPAs and advanced functions. I still think those people can have yes votes even if it's a troll vote that is like 11-1 and obviously a loss. The encouragement you get from a yes, even though it may be anonymous, is huge. Like I said before it would have been a long time before I applied again were it not for those 2 votes- which may or may not have been trolls.

Edit:
Aphotix - 89 posts
Cage- 58
Dexta - 2

The 1 poster thing is sort of irrelevant here. While they only have a small number of posts collectively, it's great to see they are scripting. In fact, I'm proud of them scripting. From time to time I consider getting demembered to get motivation to script again, because as it stands I only script when there is nothing else to do. Scripting used to be so awesome and all I wanted to do was impress you guys, and now that I'm here, all we are doing is talking down against those who are scripting while none of us have anything to show for quite a span of time.
Sure, the SRL member rank is more of a community rank, but don't you see that this is what the community has become?

Sighs…

Another semi pointless thread made by rjj. forever waiting for pictures of his sister.

When will he stop making so many threads?

From: Kasi
Sighs…

Another semi pointless thread made by rjj. forever waiting for pictures of his sister.

When will he stop making so many threads?

Stats are everything to some people (post counts, quotes, mentioned) and such.

Closed.