SRL Archive - SRL Site Discussion

New Cup?


Ian

2013-01-12 02:20:11

I think we could add a Guide Writer cup, like tutorial writer but specifically for RS guides. It would help encourage more guides, so we all win :).

Anybody agree/disagree?

Jake

2013-01-12 02:20:52

Support! :P

EDIT: Would love to see others make guides! Would be awesome for a change

grats

2013-01-12 02:25:57

Wasn't there already one?

Prometheus

2013-01-12 02:26:08

I support, too! Really fun and enjoyable making guides IMO

From: grats
Wasn't there already one?


I think that one is for writing tutorials on how to script

Ian

2013-01-12 02:27:28

From: grats
Wasn't there already one?


I didn't think there was, who has one?

Jake

2013-01-12 02:32:26

After looking at some cups, theres a cup for srl tutorial writers.
And then theres also one for "Useful Poster", so I believe that is the one the admins use here to give people that make useful posts/threads.

So maybe there isnt much of a reason for a cup for guide writers?
I just do the guides because its fun thinking of ways to train a skill, putting them together, and sharing with you guys to help you.

grats

2013-01-12 03:08:18

oh yea tutorials my bad

a guide is a tutorial, the cup for tutorials is for any type of tutorial


a guide on how to kill something, or a tutorial on how to kill something, both can be the same thing

Flight

2013-01-12 03:14:18

I think guides would be considered content towards Useful Poster or Tutorial Writer.

P1nky

2013-01-12 03:15:51

From: Flight
I think guides would be considered content towards Useful Poster or Tutorial Writer.


Agreed, 'Tutorial Writer' falls in this category.

Ian

2013-01-12 03:17:24

Ok, I guess they would be pretty similar :)

Mr[S]

2013-01-12 04:36:14

I think I know who would get this first :P

Hobbit

2013-01-12 04:40:52

Guides falls under tutorials.

Jake

2013-01-12 11:12:36

From: Hobbit
Guides falls under tutorials.

Oh I see, this whole time I had the feeling that the cup was only for srl tutorials/scripting, etc. Thanks for clearing it up! :)