SRL Archive - RS3 Outdated / Broken Scripts

King's Enchantress

Nice release! Haven't looked through the code but maybe it has something to do with the mouse over text option? Try turning that graphic option off, it might be covering up some rings? Just a thought

From: Ashaman88
Nice release! Haven't looked through the code but maybe it has something to do with the mouse over text option? Try turning that graphic option off, it might be covering up some rings? Just a thought

Thanks! I think it is due to the mouse over the code because I use if ExistItem(i) in my for to do loops, I didnt know it was possible ot turn them off :P

E* Worked, will add to the OP, Thanks Ash!

From: SRLKing
Thanks! I think it is due to the mouse over the code because I use if ExistItem(i) in my for to do loops, I didnt know it was possible ot turn them off :P

E* Worked, will add to the OP, Thanks Ash!

np it was a problem with some of my scripts too, was bugging me why it wasn't working!

From: Ashaman88
np it was a problem with some of my scripts too, was bugging me why it wasn't working!

Lol , I will probably make a thread about it to let others who may not already know about it :P I was like WTH SCRIPT XD

You guys know this currently makes 400-600k an hour right? :p

[Hint] D:\Users\crisp packet\Downloads\KingsEnchantressV1PUBLIC.simba(52:10): Variable 'Result' never used at line 51
[Error] D:\Users\crisp packet\Downloads\KingsEnchantressV1PUBLIC.simba(100:7): Identifier expected at line 99
Compiling failed.


i get this error

From: SRLKing
You guys know this currently makes 400-600k an hour right? :p

Damn you for ruining my profit!!! :tongue: But it really depends on the prices, yesterday morning I was doing 300k/h, on the afternoon I was doing 600k/h.

Anyways, I know you want super effectiveness, but you should add a small antiban and a DTM for the rings to give a little bit more randomness when clicking.

That's my opinion, but overall good work!

is the error im getting becoz of the anti leech if so can some oint me towards a tutorial so i can learn this stuff thnx

From: ajg0001991
is the error im getting becoz of the anti leech if so can some oint me towards a tutorial so i can learn this stuff thnx

Yes it's the anti-leech.

profit/hr? gz on release :P

ive been sate here for bwt 15 mins now trying to find this anti leech any tutorials please i need help with this im new to sripting srl

can any 1 give me a clue as wat i have to do to remove anti leech i really wanna use this script i now u guys cant tell me but im sure u can point me in the right direction =)

just looked at the script.
Function OpenBankSW:Boolean; never returns a result
so eithier change to a procedure or make it return a result

From: SRLKing
You guys know this currently makes 400-600k an hour right? :p

Doesn't compile.

Just removed some of the "error message" stuff that ends the scripts as it seemed there were mistakes. Compiles now, will test, thanks for script :)

e/ Apparently I removed something crucial, will have to look it over some more.

From: Voyaging
Doesn't compile.

Just removed some of the "error message" stuff that ends the scripts as it seemed there were mistakes. Compiles now, will test, thanks for script :)

e/ Apparently I removed something crucial, will have to look it over some more.

that's the antileech. It's fairly basic :p

From: The Killer
just looked at the script.
Function OpenBankSW:Boolean; never returns a result
so eithier change to a procedure or make it return a result

lol thnx for ur efforts in trying to help me i kinda understand wat u mean but dont know how to fix it cud u point towards a tutorial to help me further plz?

From: ajg0001991
lol thnx for ur efforts in trying to help me i kinda understand wat u mean but dont know how to fix it cud u point towards a tutorial to help me further plz?

Ok,
functions are for returning a result (such as a boolean, returns true or false)

procedures are for doing things, however they don't return a result (they just do them and move on)

so therefore as the function isn't being used to return a result, the op should be using a proceudre.
doesn't matter, this isn't the anti leech, It's just something I'm telling the op to help him improve.

From: The Killer
Ok,
functions are for returning a result (such as a boolean, returns true or false)

procedures are for doing things, however they don't return a result (they just do them and move on)

so therefore as the function isn't being used to return a result, the op should be using a proceudre.
doesn't matter, this isn't the anti leech, It's just something I'm telling the op to help him improve.

ok im confuse now wat am i ddoing to get rid of the anti leech ??

From: SRLKing
As this is a public release, it will have an anti-leech, it is very simple and it will compile, just not run as you'd like

From: The Killer
that's the antileech. It's fairly basic :p

mfw

From: ajg0001991
ok im confuse now wat am i ddoing to get rid of the anti leech ??

ok, forget what I'v said so far, I can't give too much away for antileech (not my script afterall) but you have to delete a very minimal amount of characters (less than 10, could be more specific but not my place to say)

From: Voyaging
mfw

so ur telling me it shud compile but wont work properly even with the anti leech well if this the case my scrip wont even compile and this is reallys starting to cabbage my head is the thing i need to change on function (bankremaining) or (openbankSW)?

From: ajg0001991
so ur telling me it shud compile but wont work properly even with the anti leech well if this the case my scrip wont even compile and this is reallys starting to cabbage my head is the thing i need to change on function (bankremaining) or (openbankSW)?

No I'm saying OP is a liar

lol funny anti leech worked it out thnx for help =)

From: SRLKing
You guys know this currently makes 400-600k an hour right? :p

could u by any chance add a proggy report mage xp per hour cash per hour?

From: Voyaging
No I'm saying OP is a liar

Op is a liar? The script works perfectly fine. You just need to learn to script to remove the anti-leech. It isn't even missing a procedure. Half of the script is just commented out. The other part you just need to change a simple step. I'm not telling anymore than that. The OpenBankSW is a function because when I later add anti-ban and another possible fail safe I will make it return a result :p also the proggy will be added when I get home :p I might add a DTM for the rings to make sure that the rings are their as an extra fail safe. Right now I have ran it with 25+ hours without a problem. This was personal before it was public :p

From: Voyaging
mfw

The script will compile once you uncomment the procedures, but then it will not run as intended. If you don't know that the script needs to have everything that is in blue then you need to reread the tutorials before accusing me of lying.

From: SRLKing
Op is a liar? The script works perfectly fine. You just need to learn to script to remove the anti-leech. It isn't even missing a procedure. Half of the script is just commented out. The other part you just need to change a simple step. I'm not telling anymore than that. The OpenBankSW is a function because when I later add anti-ban and another possible fail safe I will make it return a result :p also the proggy will be added when I get home :p I might add a DTM for the rings to make sure that the rings are their as an extra fail safe. Right now I have ran it with 25+ hours without a problem. This was personal before it was public :p

From: SRLKing
The script will compile once you uncomment the procedures, but then it will not run as intended. If you don't know that the script needs to have everything that is in blue then you need to reread the tutorials before accusing me of lying.

I know what the anti-leech is, I'm just saying it doesn't compile and you said it would.

From: Voyaging
I know what the anti-leech is, I'm just saying it doesn't compile and you said it would.

I meant after the script was unncommented, I can edit the OP if it will be better for you. I didn't think that it would be misunderstood :p Just rather than calling me lying, ask if the OP can be edited please, it will go much better and not upset anybody(:

From: SRLKing
I meant after the script was unncommented, I can edit the OP if it will be better for you. I didn't think that it would be misunderstood :p Just rather than calling me lying, ask if the OP can be edited please, it will go much better and not upset anybody(:

Sorry, didn't mean to upset anybody. Script is very nice, thanks for your work!

From: Voyaging
Sorry, didn't mean to upset anybody. Script is very nice, thanks for your work!

Perfectly alright! Just ask nicely and most people are very willing around here(: I will edit the OP when I get home tonight. If anybody is really having trouble PM and I will point then to a tutorial that addresses the anti-leech

Oh wauw can't buy cosmics anymore..

From: largovich
Oh wauw can't buy cosmics anymore..

Cosmics have been buying for a steady 209 GP since before I released the script and emerald rings before were at 1100 depending on the day. If I notice a dent in profit from the norm(fluctuates daily) I will take down the script. Rings of dueling sell above med easily right now.

From: SRLKing
Cosmics have been buying for a steady 209 GP since before I released the script and emerald rings before were at 1100 depending on the day. If I notice a dent in profit from the norm(fluctuates daily) I will take down the script. Rings of dueling sell above med easily right now.

Aha, What's the rough amount of rings per hour?

From: largovich
Aha, What's the rough amount of rings per hour?

should be around 1200. Ill measure it and find out :P Putting in the proggy today!

From: SRLKing
should be around 1200. Ill measure it and find out :P Putting in the proggy today!

The script (Iambubbleman's) before EOC did around 1500-1600. I think you can get that aswell.

From: largovich
The script (Iambubbleman's) before EOC did around 1500-1600. I think you can get that aswell.

E* the script does roughly 1700 rings an hour with no lag.

From: SRLKing
E* the script does roughly 1700 rings an hour with no lag.

That's a big difference!

From: largovich
That's a big difference!

If you don't like it then either use an alternative script/ make your own or put some effort into speeding up this one.

From: The Killer
If you don't like it then either use an alternative script/ make your own or put some effort into speeding up this one.

I meant it in a positive way.. He said it was about 1200 rings p/h actually it was 1700+ p/h..

From: largovich
I meant it in a positive way.. He said it was about 1200 rings p/h actually it was 1700+ p/h..

oppsy, sorry pal, thought you were being negative about THIS script because it hasn't got that many/hr

From: SRLKing
Cosmics have been buying for a steady 209 GP since before I released the script and emerald rings before were at 1100 depending on the day. If I notice a dent in profit from the norm(fluctuates daily) I will take down the script. Rings of dueling sell above med easily right now.

Indeed, cosmics were 113 but could only buy for 209 and remerald rings for 1081 and selling dueling rings at 1607 :\ Not so much of a profit with these prices.

From: Slashed
Indeed, cosmics were 113 but could only buy for 209 and remerald rings for 1081 and selling dueling rings at 1607 :\ Not so much of a profit with these prices.

roughly 300gp profit? dats pretty good imo, specially if its possible to get nearly 1k enchants /hr

From: The Killer
roughly 300gp profit? dats pretty good imo, specially if its possible to get nearly 1k enchants /hr

Last night I sold my rings for about 1900gp ea, cosmics bought for 176, emerald rings bought for 1300. Thats 424 each or at 1700 rings an hour is 7 20k an hour, for only needing lv 2 enchant that's pree good :P

From: Slashed
Indeed, cosmics were 113 but could only buy for 209 and remerald rings for 1081 and selling dueling rings at 1607 :\ Not so much of a profit with these prices.

Rings of dueling dont buy or sell at their mid price. You need to do a test then plug what you paid for the materials into the script, I did this so profit wouldnt be way off due to flucuations.

haha, nice anti leach, its fairly simple just dont think too hard!

From: muffinheadstatus
haha, nice anti leach, its fairly simple just dont think too hard!

Exactly(; post any bugs you may find!

i havent found any bugs yet except when it lags it just skips a ring is all. but other than that i haven't, oh and very nice bank anti leech too, took me a few min to figure out

From: muffinheadstatus
i havent found any bugs yet except when it lags it just skips a ring is all. but other than that i haven't, oh and very nice bank anti leech too, took me a few min to figure out

Sometimes it will register the XP as gained and that will make the script go to the next ring :P

Nice script…seems to be running fine for me without changing any steps?

Nice script, thanks!

I'm having a small glitch once in a while. It fails to withdraw when there is 1 emerald ring left in inventory. I've watched it not deposit it and then logoff.

I'm thinking that because of lag it is not allowing it to finish enchanting before opening the bank?

I'll try to screenshot it next time.

i get this error:

KingsEnchantressV1.2PUBLIC.simba(127:11): Identifier expected at line 126
Compiling failed.

The people who can't solve the anti leech are plain dumb. *wink*//*wink*

Is there any chance that you will be adding dragonstone to the bot?

From: IceTask
Is there any chance that you will be adding dragonstone to the bot?

No, as I do not use it and am currently working on my waterfiend script, I might later in the future.

Seems nice, how much of a profit does this make and are rings of dueling the best to make?

From: Rincewind
Seems nice, how much of a profit does this make and are rings of dueling the best to make?

Not quite sure the profit as I haven't been using it, and as far as I know thye arew :P

Seems to work great :). I dislike tho how standard deposit function for some reason deposits rings 1 by 1, so I replaced it with my procedure:

procedure BankDepositAll(invSlot:Integer);
begin
Mouse(itemCoords(invSlot).x, itemCoords(invSlot).y, 2, 2, false);
ChooseOption('eposit-All');
end;

And replaced Deposit(2, 28, True); with BankDepositAll(2);

From: ProoM
Seems to work great :). I dislike tho how standard deposit function for some reason deposits rings 1 by 1, so I replaced it with my procedure:

procedure BankDepositAll(invSlot:Integer);
begin
Mouse(itemCoords(invSlot).x, itemCoords(invSlot).y, 2, 2, false);
ChooseOption('eposit-All');
end;

And replaced Deposit(2, 28, True); with BankDepositAll(2);

It should deposit them all :P But im glad you got it working to your liking!

Anti-leech #help ?

From: 3von
Anti-leech #help ?

Long outdated, I'll update to EOC this weekend

From: King
Long outdated, I'll update to EOC this weekend

sick, thanks.

From: 3von
sick, thanks.

Not a problem, I will probably make a new script all together, whatcha want it to do? Post suggestions, features you want.

From: King
Not a problem, I will probably make a new script all together, whatcha want it to do? Post suggestions, features you want.

I haven't used this script before, but the same concept just entirely functional would be sick.

anti-leech has to be taken down now, so have fun with that, this wont compile

From: 3von
I haven't used this script before, but the same concept just entirely functional would be sick.

Can do that(:

From: pwncocoaman
anti-leech has to be taken down now, so have fun with that, this wont compile

As stated before, script is outdated, hence the anti leech. Nice first post being rude by the way, makes me really want to fix this for you.

outdated/antileech. pm when/if updated. thanks and gig 'em.