SRL Archive - SRL Bugs

PercentBlackMM seems to be gone?


NexPB

2012-03-06 15:23:26

Title.

Richard

2012-03-06 15:25:56

I made that function on my old laptop, I'll see if I can find it.

EDIT: That was actually a massive lie, I'm very sorry, I made something similar called PercentColorMM, just use that with the color black.

Coh3n

2012-03-06 19:36:34


PercentColorMM(clBlack, 0);

JN13

2012-03-06 23:32:04

Sigh… there goes my Script :p off to code…

Harry

2012-03-06 23:38:50

Can't it be re-aliased again?

Coh3n

2012-03-07 01:13:12

From: johnnimms13
Sigh… there goes my Script :p off to code…
What? Replace PercentBlackMM with what I posted and you're done. That's all the function was anyway.

NexPB

2012-03-07 10:47:02

Thanks for reply ;D

Harry

2012-03-07 10:56:49

From: Coh3n
What? Replace PercentBlackMM with what I posted and you're done. That's all the function was anyway.

But why? I thought you were going to readd it :/

Coh3n

2012-03-07 15:14:55

From: Harry
But why? I thought you were going to readd it :/
There's really no need now. It's a one line function that was only in the include to use throughout the random solvers.

Yago

2012-03-07 15:22:39

From: Coh3n
There's really no need now. It's a one line function that was only in the include to use throughout the random solvers.


A few scripts used it… I say some post of some compiling errors.

Harry

2012-03-07 16:00:10

From: Coh3n
There's really no need now. It's a one line function that was only in the include to use throughout the random solvers.

There's no need for a lot of parts of the stuff in the SRL include, but it's kept in there for backporting reasons, and users find it useful and convenient. There's no need to remove it when quite a few scripts use it, and it causes no harm, no?

Sin

2012-03-07 16:02:36

What does it do anyway?

JN13

2012-03-07 19:20:37

From: Harry
There's no need for a lot of parts of the stuff in the SRL include, but it's kept in there for backporting reasons, and users find it useful and convenient. There's no need to remove it when quite a few scripts use it, and it causes no harm, no?



Agreed! :spot:

Coh3n

2012-03-07 19:25:31

From: Harry
There's no need for a lot of parts of the stuff in the SRL include, but it's kept in there for backporting reasons, and users find it useful and convenient. There's no need to remove it when quite a few scripts use it, and it causes no harm, no?
I agree, though it's already done. If someone wants to send a pull request so be it. I didn't mean to remove it; I thought I moved all the functions from the old common.simba, but I must have missed it.

Harry

2012-03-08 16:37:12

Ok, made pull request then.