YoHoJo
2011-11-19 03:11:47
2011-11-19 03:11:47
2011-11-19 03:15:51
From: YoHoJo
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-57326934-64/intel-supercomputer-revamp-needs-our-50-core-chip/
2011-11-19 03:24:19
From: kingarabian
Its gonna be another 20 years before we can buy this I assume.
2011-12-01 20:37:45
From: kingarabian
Its gonna be another 20 years before we can buy this I assume.
2011-12-01 20:39:44
2011-12-01 20:42:42
2011-12-01 20:44:08
From: Silent SPY
like what's his face's law says it will (someone remind me please, I'm so tired). Then we could see this kind of thing much sooner.
2011-12-01 20:50:17
From: R4nd0m
Moore's law
Every 18 months we will see a double in speed, for about 20 years this has been true and has yet to be proven wrong.
2011-12-10 15:25:51
2011-12-16 14:28:39
2011-12-16 14:46:48
From: DemiseScythe
Sounds interesting but I doubt regular users can gain anything from 50 cores. 4 is plenty of processing power
2011-12-16 14:53:56
From: Failure
For now, trust me soonish we need to have a 8-core to be able to play games smooth. Look how they're developing now a days :p
2011-12-22 07:11:13
2011-12-22 07:16:25
2011-12-22 07:41:11
From: Shuttleu
50 cores is nothing. pfft!
http://www.pcworld.com/article/174318/tilera_targets_intel_amd_with_100core_processor.html
~shut
2011-12-22 07:48:59
2011-12-22 08:35:09