SRL Archive - Discussions & Debates

Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and PROTECT IP


PotentPK

2011-11-17 15:44:27

American Censorship Day November 16 - Join the fight to stop SOPA

Apparently yesterday (November 16, 2011) were the hearings on the first American Censorship system. The government seems to be trying to pass a bill to protect Intellectual Property by censoring the internet.

Any thoughts on this? I personally think this wouldn't work and wouldn't change piracy at all. It would most likely just end up censoring free speech.

Any thoughts?


Here is an article I found explaining it:

U.S. Rep Lamar Smith (R-Texas), along with 12 co-sponsors, last month introduced the Stop Online Piracy Act, (H.R. 3261). The bill is meant to prevent the theft of intellectual property that's online and in particular seeks to clamp down on foreign websites that steal content from American producers. Critics, however, say the bill amounts to Internet censorship. Here's a look at five key provisions.
1. Many of SOPA's provisions are aimed at foreign websites that stream or otherwise make available copyrighted content, such as movies and music, to U.S. audiences. SOPA allows the U.S. attorney general to seek a court order against such sites to block them, using technical means such as DNS filtering.
2. Online service providers, like ISPs, search engines, ad networks, and payment providers, are required to withhold services to websites that are deemed by a court to be infringing copyrights held by U.S. content producers. Further, ISPs must block U.S. Web users' access to such sites.
3. The bill grants civil claims immunity to Web services providers for any actions they take in order to comply with the terms of the act. In other words, a website that's been blocked by an ISP after being found to be infringing can't turn around and sue the ISP for denial of service or breach of contract.
[App developers say Google isn't doing enough to prevent unauthorized app copying. See Android Survey Highlights Piracy Problem.]
4. SOPA takes specific aim at purveyors of online pharmaceuticals that sell drugs to individuals without a prescription. It authorizes ISPs and other Web services providers to withhold services to such sites, many of which operate from India and Canada.
5. SOPA requires the secretary of state and secretary of commerce to appoint intellectual property attaches to all embassies in foreign countries. Part of the attaches' remit would be to work with local authorities to establish programs to cut down on intellectual property theft.
SOPA isn't without controversy. Backers say its measures are necessary to stop rampant online piracy. "The Internet harbors a category of bad faith actors whose very business models consist of infringing copyrighted American books, software, movies, and music with impunity," said Maria Pallange, national register of copyrights, during House testimony Wednesday.
And Pfizer chief security officer John Clark said passage of the bill is essential to protect U.S. consumers from knockoff drugs that are potentially harmful. "For Pfizer, pharmaceutical counterfeiting is first and foremost an issue of patient health and safety," said Clark.
Critics, however, contend that some SOPA provisions go too far and would chill free speech on the Internet and stifle innovation. "Any government intervention in the online ecosystem that is the Internet can and will have a ripple effect on more than just its bad actors," said U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), during testimony.
Companies could abuse such a law "to protect outdated business models by quashing new innovations in their infancy and discouraging less than complimentary speech," said Wyden.
SOPA currently sits in the House Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition, and the Internet. It has yet to be introduced to the floor for a vote.


Source: SOPA: 5 Key Provisions Of Anti-Piracy Bill - Government - Policy & Regulation - Informationweek

doublex8

2011-11-17 15:58:53

Makes me want to leave this country

Main

2011-11-17 16:19:20

seriously why are they doing this…. They are affecting themselves too!

i luffs yeww

2011-11-17 17:27:41

From: Main
seriously why are they doing this…. They are affecting themselves too!


If you make the rules, you can break the rules.

Congress can be involved with insider trading, and it's completely legal. Just as a comparison to this.

Silent

2011-11-18 00:14:53

Help do something about it:
http://demandprogress.org/blacklist/

doublex8

2011-11-18 00:18:19

From: Silent SPY
Help do something about it:
http://demandprogress.org/blacklist/


I think it might be too late to, didn't it pass?

bbri06

2011-11-18 00:58:17

I don't think a decision has been made yet. If the bill actually passes or has been passed I will be thoroughly amazed. The record and movie companies may be big, but Google is fucking immense. Logic is against the act, and it seems to me that the most powerful companies are against the act.

Silent

2011-11-18 00:58:45

From: doublex8
I think it might be too late to, didn't it pass?


Not according to this e-mail I got like 5 hours ago.

Nobody thought it could be done, but it looks like we've turned the tide against the Internet Blacklist Bill. Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi just spoke out against it, and Republican Darrell Issa says it now stands "no chance of passage"!

It's been a show of force like no other: More than 700k anti-censorship contacts have been delivered to Congress so far this week, as the Blacklsit Bill gets heard in committee.

What an amazing couple of days – let's top it off, and spread the great news!

Please send one more message to Congress – even if you already have – touting our numbers and telling them they need to back down. Let's make it clear that the Internet has risen up, and won't back down until Congress heeds our calls.

Thanks for you continued enthusiasm, and your willingness to stand up for everything that's great about the Internet.

-The Demand Progress team

Lane

2011-11-27 03:01:34

Hmm, it really does make me want to leave this dying country even quicker, however it didn't pass, for that i'm thankful. On the other hand, if it did pass… TOR/JonDo Should do the job until i'm 18 and could move to Europe.. lol

[XoL]

2011-11-30 18:44:16

It Passed, but it has been changed slightly

We are no longer in "blame" but rather only the company providing the material (ex: Google for youtube)

The gov. has asked the big companies to think of a way to filter the content and nothing will be put into place until ideas are thrown out for the Gov. to pick.

weequ

2011-11-30 18:53:36

Lets hope that big companies like Google stop serving US customers then like they did with China. I doubt it though.

josh81193

2011-11-30 19:25:27

From: R4nd0m
The gov. has asked the big companies to think of a way to filter the content and nothing will be put into place until ideas are thrown out for the Gov. to pick.


So basically the owners' of the website are now liable, rather than the person who uploaded the content?

[XoL]

2011-11-30 22:24:01

From: josh81193
So basically the owners' of the website are now liable, rather than the person who uploaded the content?


Pretty much, I am sure this will change

hamster31

2011-12-01 12:09:46

Um SOPA didn't pass yet…its still in the house and is open for revision last time i checked…they won't do or say anything until the 15th of december i believe

oudshoorn

2011-12-01 14:40:15

Thank god i don't live in the US