SRL Archive - News and General

Hey all,

Just wanted to find out how people are getting along with dungeoneering :)

I'm kinda into chronically abusing iDungeon.
Here's pretty recent proggy. I'm currently 107 dungeoneering :D

As of right now 10/11/11 I am ranked 991 out of over 30,000 users using iDungeon.(according to ShadowScripting's highscores)

What're you're levels/proggies?

Great, you enjoy a script from a different cheating website, now please stop advertising it here? :(

From: Harry
Great, you enjoy a script from a different cheating website, now please stop advertising it here? :(

I enjoy the results.
This is not advertising. If others agree with you then i can certainly remove it.
I have seen other threads similar to mine. Please be open minded. This is the general section. Can i not talk about that which i please?

Thanks

nice dung lvl dude! :) sadly rsbuddy registeration si down soo i cant use i dungeon :( stuck 46 :(

I got pures with 99, 98, and 91 dung.

Got my main to 102 then stopped, having all chaotics is enough for me. :p

From: footballjds
I enjoy the results.
This is not advertising. If others agree with you then i can certainly remove it.
I have seen other threads similar to mine. Please be open minded. This is the general section. Can i not talk about that which i please?

Thanks

Well, your signature surely is huge. (read: too large)

That is between a friend and I, I have 90 dung and he currently has 88. Atm going for 99.

96 dung.. 2410 total level :D

From: Wizzup?
Well, your signature surely is huge. (read: too large)

Yup.

99 dung here.

Yeah I don't have good results with iDungeon, it seems to fail extremely often for me, so I stopped using it.

From: Flight
Yeah I don't have good results with iDungeon, it seems to fail extremely often for me, so I stopped using it.

You're doing something wrong :p

Well, it clicks on doors it can't reach, clicks on bridges that aren't complete, clicks on NPCs it can't reach, clicks the same tiles in an ice room without alternation. Would that have anything to do with setup on my end?

From: Flight
Well, it clicks on doors it can't reach, clicks on bridges that aren't complete, clicks on NPCs it can't reach, clicks the same tiles in an ice room without alternation. Would that have anything to do with setup on my end?

Either the script or the client could be out-dated.

Well, I don't have a paypal or something that i could pay for rs or anything else like idung… so yeah, mine's 1 (since my last main was banned for botting).

By the way, if someone is not using idung, or just stop playing rs, giving it to me for a while would be very helpful :redface: (thanks).

SRL community is less mainstream then others, those who know srl usually know rsbot, rsbuddy and all of that. Wouldn't call this advertising.

wow very impressive, someone needs to hook me up with that.

edit:…

i just explained how to get idung pro free but i rather not state it publicly as obvi as it may seem sooo….
if u want idungpro free pm me….

From: chitin
edit:…

i just explained how to get idung pro free but i rather not state it publicly as obvi as it may seem sooo….
if u want idungpro free pm me….

You'd be surprised what you can find laying around in Pastebin… :rolleyes:

From: Flight
You'd be surprised what you can find laying around in Pastebin… :rolleyes:

well theres another free script thats open source which you can esily edit with some java knowledge. but then again that requires knowledge…and gawd oh gawd i hate java…my way is sooooo much simpler.

:f:

although lets face it. if they cant use the search function in a forum how the fk r they gonna browse thru pastebin:duh:

always decompilers tho :p

ahh got it only 70-ish got bored of it, no use of bots. dont want to buy anything lol

Been dunging on my pure. Already have ccb, staff, arcane stream, gravite rapier… Only 45 attack right now because I plan on it being a mauler and I still haven't done a few quests for 50 attack, eventually I want to get 60 attack + 70/75 def + 70-77 prayer. :p

Is something like IDungeoin possible to be made with reflection? or is it more advanced than what's possible with reflection?

From: ry0240
Is something like IDungeoin possible to be made with reflection? or is it more advanced than what's possible with reflection?

RsBuddy is reflection therefore all the scripts use reflection, so it's, without a doubt, possible for us to create as well.

From: Flight
RsBuddy is reflection therefore all the scripts use reflection, so it's, without a doubt, possible for us to create as well.

yeah but 2 quick questions:

who discovered/ developed reflection?

and why does under skills in the script section under dungeoneering, slayer etc does it say NEVER lol?

im guessing without java its probably too complex a script.

From: Flight
RsBuddy is reflection therefore all the scripts use reflection, so it's, without a doubt, possible for us to create as well.

RSBuddy uses ASM (injection), as well as reflection. However, it's still possible for a dungeoneering script to be made with reflection.

From: TRiLeZ
RSBuddy uses ASM (injection), as well as reflection. However, it's still possible for a dungeoneering script to be made with reflection.

What exactly does injection do vs reflection alone? I know reflection reads off the client.

From: chitin
yeah but 2 quick questions:

who discovered/ developed reflection?

and why does under skills in the script section under dungeoneering, slayer etc does it say NEVER lol?

im guessing without java its probably too complex a script.

it says "Never" not "NEVER" – and that's the last post field. Nothing has been posted in those subforums.

From: Flight
RsBuddy is reflection therefore all the scripts use reflection, so it's, without a doubt, possible for us to create as well.

Alright Flight, guess you know what your next project is. lol jk. Unless you're up for a challenge. ;)

From: ry0240
Alright Flight, guess you know what your next project is. lol jk. Unless you're up for a challenge. ;)

I'd like to stay sane, atleast for now. Something like this I could definitely see happening with a team, but for a single person to take on that project, it's very unlikely.

From: TRiLeZ
RSBuddy uses ASM (injection), as well as reflection. However, it's still possible for a dungeoneering script to be made with reflection.

Seriously? I've been told it uses just reflection by quite a few people. Yikes.

From: Harry
Seriously? I've been told it uses just reflection by quite a few people. Yikes.

Seriously it uses injection

Yeah I've been told the same. Yuck… all the more reason to stay away from it.

Also, Happy Birthday, footballjds!

From: Flight
Yeah I've been told the same. Yuck… all the more reason to stay away from it.

Also, Happy Birthday, footballjds!

Thanks bro, (:
I stood in a gas station at 11:55 pm 10/17/11 and waited with my ID till the 18th. Bought a dutch, then rolled a bomb ass blunt ;)

If I need to run iDungeon for hours and hours, days, years, to reach lvl120…I prefer to play by myself >.<
But the worst of dungeon is to get a good team :(

From: UNKNOWN69
If I need to run iDungeon for hours and hours, days, years, to reach lvl120…I prefer to play by myself >.<
But the worst of dungeon is to get a good team :(

It only takes 3 months to get 120 from 99. And the point of botting is so that you don't have to, and to save yourself time. If you're getting 30k xp/hour, and you sleep for 8 hours… Free 240k xp by the time you wake up, which is about 1-2 hours of doing it legit.

From: josh81193
It only takes 3 months to get 120 from 99. And the point of botting is so that you don't have to, and to save yourself time. If you're getting 30k xp/hour, and you sleep for 8 hours… Free 240k xp by the time you wake up, which is about 1-2 hours of doing it legit.

Yeah, I could bot 24/7. The problem is that we are talking about a main. I don't want to loose my account by botting so many hours and then get caught by 'fagex'.

From: UNKNOWN69
Yeah, I could bot 24/7. The problem is that we are talking about a main. I don't want to loose my account by botting so many hours and then get caught by 'fagex'.

iDung has an extremely low ban rate, personally my main is 102 dungeoneering (99% botted) and I'm working on a pure that's currently 92, which is 100% botted, hell, the whole account is 100% botted and I doubt it's going to get banned.

From: josh81193
iDung has an extremely low ban rate, personally my main is 102 dungeoneering (99% botted) and I'm working on a pure that's currently 92, which is 100% botted, hell, the whole account is 100% botted and I doubt it's going to get banned.

Yeh, been hearding that…
But dunno…It seems that jgex is waiting for the right moment. Otherwise, I would bot dunge. Would save me time!

And now they are talking on updating java, they say that 'It gives us many more options in the fight against bots'.

^
What can you tell me about that?

From: UNKNOWN69
Yeh, been hearding that…
But dunno…It seems that jgex is waiting for the right moment. Otherwise, I would bot dunge. Would save me time!

And now they are talking on updating java, they say that 'It gives us many more options in the fight against bots'.

^
What can you tell me about that?

It does give more options. But signed always has given them that option.

From: mormonman
It does give more options. But signed always has given them that option.

That's why I don't want to take that risk, although would be helpful.

u can bot safely until the NEXT UPDATE (presumebly after halloween.) after that id def stop for a week or 2 to make sure rs hasnt anything up its sleve….

lol. source: my intuition.

What's with that update? They said anything on the behind scenes? o:

From: Flight
Yeah I've been told the same. Yuck… all the more reason to stay away from it.

Why is that?

From: Method
Why is that?

As far as I know injection is adding modifications to a class file. What's not detectable about that?

From: Flight
As far as I know injection is adding modifications to a class file. What's not detectable about that?

Sure, modifying the client could be detected, just as many other things could be detected. The difference with bytecode injection is that it can be used to negate or circumvent any detection techniques that the client employs. The same can't be said for bots that use reflection or ones that grab data from the screen buffer. In that sense, a bot that uses bytecode injection is considerably more powerful and potentially safer than a bot that doesn't.

Well I don't know a whole lot about either of the two, like I said before that's what I know about injection. What makes reflection detectable?

From: Flight
Well I don't know a whole lot about either of the two, like I said before that's what I know about injection. What makes reflection detectable?

I didn't claim that using reflection to access the client's data was detectable in itself; in fact, it probably isn't. What is potentially detectable is the way a bot loads the client, interacts with it, and perhaps even the fact that the bot is running at all. Bots that don't use bytecode injection are substantially more limited when it comes to addressing issues like these.

There has been some interesting discussion over at MITB about detectability and client hacking in general, if you're interested in learning more about bot development and the RS client.

From: Method
I didn't claim that using reflection to access the client's data was detectable in itself; in fact, it probably isn't. What is potentially detectable is the way a bot loads the client, interacts with it, and perhaps even the fact that the bot is running at all. Bots that don't use bytecode injection are substantially more limited when it comes to addressing issues like these.

There has been some interesting discussion over at MITB about detectability and client hacking in general, if you're interested in learning more about bot development and the RS client.

Yes I remember Mopar making a few statements about how SMART is, infact, not so safe to use and how it can be easily detected.

From: Flight
Yes I remember Mopar making a few statements about how SMART is, infact, not so safe to use and how it can be easily detected.

Waaaa? :x
…now I'm worried…

E: Where can I found that discussion about detectability and client hacking? I would like to see..

For pure client hacking info, Mopar's forums are unbeatable.

Here's some links you might find enlightening, Unknown.
http://villavu.com/forum/showthread.php?t=58956
http://villavu.com/forum/showthread.php?t=59019

You can take his word for it, Mopar knows clients like I know airplanes.

From: Flight
For pure client hacking info, Mopar's forums are unbeatable.

Here's some links you might find enlightening, Unknown.
http://villavu.com/forum/showthread.php?t=58956
http://villavu.com/forum/showthread.php?t=59019

You can take his word for it, Mopar knows clients like I know airplanes.

Oh my…Things Jagex can do…Things I already did…Stuff I can't change…