i luffs yeww
2011-08-31 14:41:22
As discussed here (apologies to Rick for derailing the thread), there was some talk about RuneScape functionality being implemented in Simba itself, rather than in an include or extension.
To me, the disadvantages are small. The advantages, as well, are somewhat small, but could be nice for tutorials, learning quickly, etc.
The learning and ease of programming is probably the main 'argument' for it, in my opinion. It would be quite nice for a new comer to learn, as all they have to do is download the SimbaInstaller.exe and they can already program for Simba. No need to mess with extensions.
It would/could also open up the idea of having things like a Simba Account Manager as a feature of Simba, rather than an extension (which isn't a big deal either way). And since people have been wanting a script manager, I don't see why not to have it implemented straight into Simba? It seems like a good choice to me.
So, discuss. :)
To me, the disadvantages are small. The advantages, as well, are somewhat small, but could be nice for tutorials, learning quickly, etc.
The learning and ease of programming is probably the main 'argument' for it, in my opinion. It would be quite nice for a new comer to learn, as all they have to do is download the SimbaInstaller.exe and they can already program for Simba. No need to mess with extensions.
It would/could also open up the idea of having things like a Simba Account Manager as a feature of Simba, rather than an extension (which isn't a big deal either way). And since people have been wanting a script manager, I don't see why not to have it implemented straight into Simba? It seems like a good choice to me.
So, discuss. :)