SRL Archive - News and General

is RSBUDDY detectable


wantonman

2011-07-24 14:49:21

is RSBUDDY detectable? how about if im smart about it, ive never used it does it have thins like smooth mouse or things to fool detection?

Smarter Child

2011-07-24 14:53:51

if you are smart about it and do not bot too much or at areas where mass bans occur, you should be ALRIGHT.

I recommend using Simba though.

Gu3st...

2011-07-24 15:41:48

There's ALWAYS a risk of getting banned while using a bot

KingKong

2011-07-24 18:01:26

From: wantonman
is RSBUDDY detectable? how about if im smart about it, ive never used it does it have thins like smooth mouse or things to fool detection?


Might wanna layoff paid bots for a while, cos i think jagex wants to remove as many bots as possible before their big update.

josh81193

2011-07-24 18:12:30

From: KingKong
Might wanna layoff paid bots for a while, cos i think jagex wants to remove as many bots as possible before their big update.


By big update you mean Clan Citadels? or is there going to be something else I haven't heard of?

Smarter Child

2011-07-24 18:39:54

From: josh81193
By big update you mean Clan Citadels? or is there going to be something else I haven't heard of?


And update that will likely break some of the paid bots out there.

KingKong

2011-07-25 00:53:15

From: josh81193
By big update you mean Clan Citadels? or is there going to be something else I haven't heard of?


Yep, thats the one im talking about. Because if jagex don't do something about those bots, then it would greatly affect other clans since they can just bot 24/7 with other bots and not get reported.

From: Smarter Child
And update that will likely break some of the paid bots out there.


^Yep, this too.

grats

2011-07-25 01:13:11

break as in a reflection update.. or break as in they're doing some major changes to detect / destroy java /injection type bots?

Flight

2011-07-25 01:19:55

From: grats
break as in a reflection update.. or break as in they're doing some major changes to detect / destroy java /injection type bots?


Not so much as game detection, but legal action I believe. They mentioned very recently they'll be going after the premium bots as well as the people who purchased them. How they can get that information is beyond me, but it makes me feel good I only use Simba. :garfield:

grats

2011-07-25 01:28:39

From: Flight
Not so much as game detection, but legal action I believe. They mentioned very recently they'll be going after the premium bots as well as the people who purchased them. How they can get that information is beyond me, but it makes me feel good I only use Simba. :garfield:


haha makes me feel good too, glad I always stick to just this place :P

Geo

2011-07-25 01:44:46

From: Flight
Not so much as game detection, but legal action I believe. They mentioned very recently they'll be going after the premium bots as well as the people who purchased them. How they can get that information is beyond me, but it makes me feel good I only use Simba. :garfield:


They'll subpoena the information from the bot owners, if they kept a record, and the bot owners must abide by a court ordered subpoena or face serious legal action, possibly jail time. But first, JaGex must bring forward a really good argument to why they need such information.

I think they'll go with the "You're making money off our intellectual property, stop." route. Which I believe would work to an extent but I don't know what their going to do about the free bots.

Guess we'll find out. :stirthepot:

Harry

2011-07-25 01:56:01

From: Geo
They'll subpoena the information from the bot owners, if they kept a record, and the bot owners must abide by a court ordered subpoena or face serious legal action, possibly jail time. But first, JaGex must bring forward a really good argument to why they need such information.

They'll need a damn good reason to subpoena that information. Saying they are making money off their virtual property is not more important than privacy laws (and often requirements that businesses have to keep their customer's information private).

KingKong

2011-07-25 03:39:55

From: Harry
They'll need a damn good reason to subpoena that information. Saying they are making money off their virtual property is not more important than privacy laws (and often requirements that businesses have to keep their customer's information private).


Im betting the odds are against paid bots, since jagex could come up with 'making money off us' or they could find some legal loophole or some other stuff, remember they are a for-profit business who won quite a few awards in the online gaming industry which means they could also claim loss of earnings due to losing legit players/loss of fame(or something like that) and dont forget that they probably have lawyers working on this stuff 24/7 or else they wouldn't have posted about it.

Harry

2011-07-25 05:46:52

From: KingKong
Im betting the odds are against paid bots, since jagex could come up with 'making money off us' or they could find some legal loophole or some other stuff, remember they are a for-profit business who won quite a few awards in the online gaming industry which means they could also claim loss of earnings due to losing legit players/loss of fame(or something like that) and dont forget that they probably have lawyers working on this stuff 24/7 or else they wouldn't have posted about it.

Well sure they could take action against the actual bots, but getting actual user information would be a big no-no. IANAL, but I can bet that any reputable court would see that a business' interest is less important than safeguarding user personal information.

josh81193

2011-07-25 09:08:09

From: Harry
Well sure they could take action against the actual bots, but getting actual user information would be a big no-no. IANAL, but I can bet that any reputable court would see that a business' interest is less important than safeguarding user personal information.


HAH. First time I've ever seen someone use IANAL, let alone using it correctly. :p

Bebe

2011-07-25 09:41:40

Of course it is detectable.

BraK

2011-07-25 09:45:39

From: Bebe
Of course it is detectable.


^ See the answer was that simple the whole time. Thank Bebe for clarifying :p

~BraK

Method

2011-07-25 10:37:12

From: Bebe
Of course it is detectable.


As is every bot, for that matter.

Gu3st...

2011-07-25 10:44:11

From: Bebe
Of course it is detectable.


From: Method
As is every bot, for that matter.


*sigh* :(

From: Zyt3x
There's ALWAYS a risk of getting banned while using a bot

Method

2011-07-25 10:53:16

From: Zyt3x
*sigh* :(


You didn't even answer the question. Saying someone might get banned for botting isn't the same as saying a bot is detectable.