Is anyone able to provide me with #646 output?
I understand I am nothing but a leacher and it may be somewhat rude of me to ask for this but there is probably someone who can provide this, just does not necessarily think anyone needs it and doesn't bother. I don't know but I'm sure people would appreciate it.
From: mormonman
http://pyroryan.net46.net/reflection/Hooks.simba
Thanks so much for the prompt reply.
I am failing to find a hook that could be a Player ID (PID), is there no such thing? I've been told it is clientside.
mormonman
2011-05-04 12:57:15
There is no Player ID, instead it is a player's index number in the player array.
From: mormonman
There is no Player ID, instead it is a player's index number in the player array.
When referring to PID advantage during duelling, is player index it?
pyroryan
2011-05-04 14:48:53
That PlayerID should really be called priorityID or something more relevant. Either way, yes it does exist in the client. I believe I have the field and so do a few other people, but its a far cry from being released to the public for abuse, especially if what I'm hearing about the advantages it provides are true.
mormonman
2011-05-04 15:08:10
From: pyroryan
That PlayerID should really be called priorityID or something more relevant. Either way, yes it does exist in the client. I believe I have the field and so do a few other people, but its a far cry from being released to the public for abuse, especially if what I'm hearing about the advantages it provides are true.
Elaborate on the advantages?
pyroryan
2011-05-04 15:09:02
From: mormonman
Elaborate on the advantages?
You attack, loot, etc. first. From what I've heard, its one of the causes of win/lose streaks in staking. I personally think its exaggerated, but no point is arguing with rumors.
mormonman
2011-05-04 15:15:35
From: pyroryan
You attack, loot, etc. first. From what I've heard, its one of the causes of win/lose streaks in staking. I personally think its exaggerated, but no point is arguing with rumors.
So it's somehow predetermined and this value shows that? Sounds very exaggerated.
pyroryan
2011-05-04 15:19:57
From: mormonman
So it's somehow predetermined and this value shows that? Sounds very exaggerated.
I'm not going to argue with other people's experiences when I have virtually none in staking. But I do know that PID does exist.
mormonman
2011-05-04 15:39:38
From: pyroryan
I'm not going to argue with other people's experiences when I have virtually none in staking. But I do know that PID does exist.
We should run tests with one of my maxed melee accounts.
Gonna try my chances here, would anyone care to share the hook? It'll be out of date this time next week.
pyroryan
2011-05-04 15:45:44
From: mormonman
We should run tests with one of my maxed melee accounts.
I'm waiting for TomTuff to max his out so I don't have to watch level 3's do battle.
mormonman
2011-05-04 15:51:40
From: pyroryan
I'm waiting for TomTuff to max his out so I don't have to watch level 3's do battle.
Mine is already maxed -.- plus with cashpile.
pyroryan
2011-05-04 16:08:36
From: mormonman
Mine is already maxed -.- plus with cashpile.
We need two to actually run tests o.o?
Or you could give this hook into the hands of someone who has been PID staking for a while now, except using a manual method of estimating pid.
I'd be able to exactly tell you whether that field is the PID or not. I would not leak it and simply keep it for my own benefit, and in a week's time it'll be out of date anyway.
pyroryan
2011-05-04 16:34:51
The hook is already in the hands of a few highly trusted and experienced stakers who will test it over the next few days. No offense, but you're new and I don't know you. Compare that to the many others who are on the list of testers or potential testers that I have known for months, some for years.
The results will be known within a week anyways.
And yes I am fully aware of the manual ways of confirming. The one I identified in #639 and #645 was checked using such manual methods.
I guess what I don't understand is why you registered and starting asking for a very specific hook that, as far as I know, is not out in the public.
Edit:
If you want to continue this conversation, we can do it over MSN since I'm tired of browsing. [email]pyro.ryan1988@gmail.com[/email]
pyroryan
2011-05-04 16:50:14
From: mormonman
I have five. All maxed.
Get on MSN in an hour? Hopefully Tom will be back by then to test stake it with you.
I'm going to go do some manual checks on it now.
Iamadam
2011-05-04 19:51:49
Jagex posted a few weeks ago that "PID" was no longer going to be used for priority - so it may have been changed already, or it may be about to change.
Method
2011-05-04 20:37:39
From: pyroryan
I guess what I don't understand is why you registered and starting asking for a very specific hook that, as far as I know, is not out in the public.
It's not? I thought just about everyone who has looked through the client in any detail knew about it. Perhaps that's not the case, though.
pyroryan
2011-05-04 20:45:18
From: Method
It's not? I thought just about everyone who has looked through the client in any detail knew about it. Perhaps that's not the case, though.
Everyone who looked at the client seems to know about it. Everyone who hasn't seems to not. At least thats the impression I got.
weequ
2011-05-04 21:34:35
There is are two kinds of "pids". One of them is client sided and it determines for example who is on top of a pile of players. (This one can be received using reflection)
The other "pid" is server sided and it determines for example who has the ability to get first hit in duels. (This one is well hidden if not impossible to get from the client)
I think that there used to only be one kind of "pid" few months ago but I'm not sure.
[Offtopic]I also heard that first hits were determined by players ip addresses in the old times[/Offtopic]
pyroryan
2011-05-04 23:41:59
From: Iamadam
Jagex posted a few weeks ago that "PID" was no longer going to be used for priority - so it may have been changed already, or it may be about to change.
Seems like it was just changed since anti and I just tested it a few hours ago (or I refound the wrong hook, not sure which at the moment). Fortunately, there are other ways go get a low PID :D
TomTuff
2011-05-05 00:28:28
From: pyroryan
Seems like it was just changed since anti and I just tested it a few hours ago (or I refound the wrong hook, not sure which at the moment). Fortunately, there are other ways go get a low PID :D
if a low PID means nothing then what's the point? I'm available to do testing, I just had my maxed melee party. Sounds like you guys have it covered though.