SRL Archive - SRL Suggestions

Remove Disguise from simba.simba


Bixby Sayz

2011-04-14 18:41:35

Thought I saw this in another thread but can't seem to find it searching. Another "senior moment" I guess.

Now that Simba has a built in Disguise function (and has for a while now) can we remove Disguise from the includes?

It's a small thing, but a small thing that would make life much easier. As it stands you have to comment this out in your includes every time SRL is updated and anyone using your scripts has to do the same in order for your scripts to work as designed.

It just seems wrong to me requiring people to modify their includes just to get your script to function as you planned. I'm just funny that way.

i luffs yeww

2011-04-14 19:12:11

Why do you have to comment it out in SRL? :x


{$i SRL/SRL.scar}

begin
SetupSRL;
Disguise('hey');
end.

works just fine for me?

Oh, I see. Disguise() in Simba does it proper, while SRL does it a lame way and just prints it.

I entirely agree with this.

MylesMadness

2011-04-14 19:13:04

From: i luffs yeww
Why do you have to comment it out in SRL? :x
Because SRL overrides it

i luffs yeww

2011-04-14 19:15:12

Yeah, I didn't know Simba did it the correct way now, and I thought it just writeln()'d it, so I didn't see the problem. :)

Coh3n

2011-04-14 19:32:24

Done.