SRL Archive - Reflection Discussion

hey fuckheads, next time you decide to shit on all reflection scripts by making the include a bunch of prosthetic overloads naturally changing all the method names, atleast dont swap the fucking parameter order around for no reason. example for bad people

procedure haroA(s: string; i: integer);

procedure haroB(i: integer; s: string);

IS NOT COOL.

pce

What's going on here?

A bit offensive, n3ss3s.. don't you think?

lol somebody's a bit butthurt.

Awesome.

I just have to agree, because your from finland.

I have to agree with n3ss3s here, just not the manor in which he presented this topic.

okay, now that you got that out…?

The anger isn't needed but understanded.

The moving around of parameter inputs is annoying.

I get frustrated when that happens too.. but sometimes it makes sense. I do it in my own scripts sometimes just to help with the logic.. At the very least, if params are rearraged or changed, there should be some sort of public notice.

Oh my god he said the F word… BAN HIM FOR LIFE!

The function changing needs to stop in general. I haven't touched the Ref include in awhile but since the R-Devs keep changing they feel they need to change everything every time. I've used all the Refection repos one way or another, except for recent and this is basically whats happening.

Need to stick with one damn way unless absolutely necessary to change it.

From: Narcle
The function changing needs to stop in general. I haven't touched the Ref include in awhile but since the R-Devs keep changing they feel they need to change everything every time. I've used all the Refection repos one way or another, except for recent and this is basically whats happening.

Need to stick with one damn way unless absolutely necessary to change it.

need to kill the ref dev team and create a new one, mainly with train in it (if he's trusted) so he can stop the rrl bullshit and get real

From: Feroc1ty
need to kill the ref dev team and create a new one, mainly with train in it (if he's trusted) so he can stop the rrl bullshit and get real

Are you a dumb ass? Just wondering.

From: Train
Are you a dumb ass? Just wondering.

Are you a virgin? Just wondering.

From: Feroc1ty
need to kill the ref dev team and create a new one, mainly with train in it (if he's trusted) so he can stop the rrl bullshit and get real

Just because is doesn't have SRL's name it does not make it not "serious" or any lesser

From: MylesMadness
Just because is doesn't have SRL's name it does not make it not "serious" or any lesser

never said it does, but why push RRL when this is SRL's website

From: Feroc1ty
never said it does, but why push RRL when this is SRL's website

What?

From: Feroc1ty
never said it does, but why push RRL when this is SRL's website

Reflection, Simba, libmml, and SMART are all being pushed, even though this is "SRL's website."

There's nothing wrong with progress. There's nothing wrong with what Timer's doing. I don't think it was the best choice to completely start over, but then again I never looked at reflection and don't know if it was in terrible condition or what (I heard of memory leaks and what not but no personal exposure).

RRL really isn't on topic, though.. There's a thread more related to RRL to post this stuff in.

From: Feroc1ty
never said it does, but why push RRL when this is SRL's website

RRL is being made by community members just like SRL reflection is. Just because its not being by the SRL development team does not make it not aloud to be pushed

How often do these type of problems with parameter switches come up? I haven't had any problems, but it sounds like a lot of other people are.

Now that I'm aware of this I'm enraged

Reflection include needs a major rewrite anyways. Tons of bugs/leaks everywhere, unstructured data params etc.

To add to my argument.

The base functions need to be SET IN STONE. The fast and reliable non memory leaking one for each. I don't care who wrote it, and frankly I'd appreciate it more if the next Dev that comes along DOESN'T mess with it just to put their name on it. Its irritating and debilitating to the scripters that use the include. I'm not singling anyone out, and possible its a note to me in the future not to do it.

Edit:
@Markus
Leaks is biggest concern imo

can someone point out where i used inappropriate language in this thread?

some dip**** giving me infractions because of a personal vendetta (evilchicken)

From: Feroc1ty
can someone point out where i used inappropriate language in this thread?

some dip**** giving me infractions because of a personal vendetta (evilchicken)

You just did :p. Thus you diserve those infractions (even more).

From: Feroc1ty
can someone point out where i used inappropriate language in this thread?

some dip**** giving me infractions because of a personal vendetta (evilchicken)

Lol, guess you didn't read his note? It's just a warning, relax, or I'll give you another one for insulting EC.

From: Feroc1ty
can someone point out where i used inappropriate language in this thread?

some dip**** giving me infractions because of a personal vendetta (evilchicken)

You are just some angry kid fighting for no cause or purpose with a lot personal issues. There's a difference between using the F word and using it to insult someone.

You really need to be suspended again because your attitude hasn't changed at all.

Closed.

This is going no where, the point is taken.