SRL Archive - RuneScape News and General

Well my friend got one of his accounts banned that he was using to store cash on (autoed on accounts and then transfered cash + items to the storage account) and then just a little bit ago he got an email from Jagex.

From: Jagex

Jagex Ltd <noreply@jagex.com> to *****@*****.***
10:43am

Dear Player,

We regret to inform you that your account has received an infraction due to a Major Macroing offense. Please visit the appeal section under Account Management to view evidence of your infraction(s) and to appeal any infraction(s) that you feel were unjustified.

To view the evidence please click here: https://secure.runescape.com/m=weblogin/loginform.ws?mod=offence-appeal&ssl=1&expired=0&dest=account_history.ws

Please note: Due to a recent bug in our infraction system, some accounts may have received a void infraction. The majority of void infractions have been removed but we cannot ensure that all infractions have been removed. We urge you to visit the appeal section to appeal any unjustified infractions received due to system errors.

Many thanks, Jagex Ltd.

Copyright © 1999 - 2011 Jagex Ltd. Jagex, RuneScape, FunOrb, War of Legends and Stellar Dawn are registered trademarks of Jagex Ltd in the United Kingdom and trademarks used in other countries of the world. By using our service you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

No idea where this should go or anything, as I'm not on the forums much.

I dunno, kinda interesting in my opinion. Not sure why they'd have a bug in it or anything or what it could mean for anyone who breaks the rules. But yeah.

something like this happened to my account. my account got a perm/year ban; year later was going to be unban but it got unban a week early. Jagex realized and manually banned it saying there was a glith and it will be unbanned on the date real date… but still is banned.. 2 years later..

So then that would mean they're either lying, or they're having more bugs.

If they're having more bugs, that either means they don't fix them, or they're developing it more and don't work out the bugs. So this could be something to pay attention to?

From: i luffs yeww
So then that would mean they're either lying, or they're having more bugs.

If they're having more bugs, that either means they don't fix them, or they're developing it more and don't work out the bugs. So this could be something to pay attention to?

correct i emailed them around 6mo ago they said they look into it.

Another screw up by Jagex, wonderful.

Am I the only one not surprised?

Its a pishing email. When you click link in the email you go to http://secure.rumesscape.com/*********

I never heard of rumesscape before.

Everyone can send a email from "noreply@jagex.com", here is a guide how to:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3h8wnkNGFo

From: rune0052
Its a pishing email. When you click link in the email you go to http://secure.rumesscape.com/*********

I never heard of rumesscape before.

Everyone can send a email from "noreply@jagex.com", here is a guide how to:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3h8wnkNGFo

Well, the link isn't rumesscape though :P

Also, welcome back! (?)

Html code in a email can make it go to a different website. When you copy paste the email, the link will change.

Im pretty sure, because some of my friends got the exact same email and told me the link woud take you to rumesscape.

I've always been here. But not much posting :P

From: rune0052
But not much posting :P

Understatement of the year right there :p

my account got unbanned after receiving a permanent ban for macroing.

From: Cheesehunk
my account got unbanned after receiving a permanent ban for macroing.

Off topic, but is that why you're getting more active? :)

From: Train
Off topic, but is that why you're getting more active? :)

Nah, that was a long long time ago unfortunately. I've just had a little bit more spare time at home so I decide to drop by here every once in a while.

Jagex does not give evidence for macroing bans, so the fact that they said click here to view the evidence … I don't get it

I think they are saying that just in case the money transfer may have been a "legit gift" and that way they have reason to excuse themselves for those odd cases.