SRL Archive - Mathematics

True of False


Simtoon

2010-07-19 06:11:39

I dont know how to do alpha so im gonna do $ for alpha

Sin $ = cos $ False?

Sin (90 - $) = sin $

Sin (90 + $) cos $

Sin (-$) = cos($)

Sin (180 + $) = Sin($)

Nava2

2010-07-19 07:12:45

-> True when $ = pi/2
-> True
-> False (I think)
-> False
-> False {sin(2pi + $) == sin($)}

Method

2010-07-19 11:10:20

From: Nava2
-> True when $ = pi/2
-> True
-> False (I think)
-> False
-> False {sin(2pi + $) == sin($)}


For the second one (Sin (90 - $) = sin $), sin(90 - 30) = sin(30) is not true??

Nava2

2010-07-19 16:09:44

You're right, idk what I'm thinking of..

Cigue

2010-07-20 12:33:03

From: Simtoon
I dont know how to do alpha so im gonna do $ for alpha

Sin $ = cos $ False?

Sin (90 - $) = sin $

Sin (90 + $) cos $

Sin (-$) = cos($)

Sin (180 + $) = Sin($)


First is true while $ = k*pi/4, where k is any odd integer.
Second is true while $ = pi/4 + k*pi, where k is any even integer.
Third is true.
Fourth is true while $ = k*pi, where k is any even integer.
Fifth is false.

Method

2010-07-20 14:26:43

From: Cigue
First is true while $ = k*pi/4, where k is any odd integer.
Second is true while $ = pi/4 + k*pi, where k is any even integer.
Third is true.
Fourth is true while $ = k*pi, where k is any even integer.
Fifth is false.


The fourth one doesn't seem right. sin(-2*pi) != cos(2*pi). 3*pi/4 + n*pi seems to be a valid answer (though there may be others).

JPHamlett

2010-07-20 23:23:20

for the second one

what if $ = 45 then its true


now keep in mind that I don't remember a lot of this stuff so no hate

Simtoon

2010-07-21 04:17:48

From: Method
The fourth one doesn't seem right. sin(-2*pi) != cos(2*pi). 3*pi/4 + n*pi seems to be a valid answer (though there may be others).


Why are you timing by pi?

Nava2

2010-07-21 08:46:24

From: Simtoon
Why are you timing by pi?


Radians.

Degrees suck, its a stupid system and radians make MUCH more sense. Also, once you get into harder mathematics, you *can't* use degrees ;)

marpis

2010-07-22 14:12:21

From: Nava2
Radians.

Degrees suck, its a stupid system and radians make MUCH more sense. Also, once you get into harder mathematics, you *can't* use degrees ;)


Lol, not in everyday life.
"How wide is that angle?"
"It's about 45 degrees" vs. "It's about Pi/4"

"The car turned in a 120 degree angle" vs.
"The car turned in a 2/3 Pi angle"

Which make more sense :rolleyes:

Ofcourse when talking about real mathematics radians are the way to go, but you can't say that radians make more sense.

ZephyrsFury

2010-07-22 23:23:39

Not to mention he's explicitly using degrees in his question.

The Claw

2010-07-23 04:52:13

From: marpis
Lol, not in everyday life.
"How wide is that angle?"
"It's about 45 degrees" vs. "It's about Pi/4"

"The car turned in a 120 degree angle" vs.
"The car turned in a 2/3 Pi angle"

Which make more sense :rolleyes:

Ofcourse when talking about real mathematics radians are the way to go, but you can't say that radians make more sense.


What if you were brought up so you knew what 2/3 pi meant intuitively and only learnt the idea of degrees in high school?

Santa_Clause

2010-07-24 07:45:14

From: The Claw
What if you were brought up so you knew what 2/3 pi meant intuitively and only learnt the idea of degrees in high school?


Lol what's that supposed to mean? Everyone teaches radian measure based on the idea that pi is 180 degrees…so the radian should succeed the degree =.=

The Claw

2010-07-24 11:40:39

I mean degrees and radians are two ways of describing the same thing, and the reason people think in degrees is because thats society's prescribed way of measuring. You said it yourself - "everyone teaches radian based on degrees"

marpis

2010-07-26 14:41:38

From: The Claw
I mean degrees and radians are two ways of describing the same thing, and the reason people think in degrees is because thats society's prescribed way of measuring. You said it yourself - "everyone teaches radian based on degrees"


Yes but degrees can be expressed in a single integer, while radians always need the Pi and mostly a fraction number..

Yakman

2010-08-04 08:00:09

radians are for mathematics but degrees are for measurements.
astronomy, marksmanship and surveying all use degrees, arcminutes and arcseconds. But when they go off to do their maths, they all convert to radians.

Cigue

2010-08-04 12:31:14

From: marpis
Yes but degrees can be expressed in a single integer, while radians always need the Pi and mostly a fraction number..


Half a pie = Pi
Full pie = 2 *Pi
three quarters of a pie = 3/2 * Pi

That's WAY better for a toddler than going "this is 180, this is 360, this is 270"

Santa_Clause

2010-08-05 09:45:06

From: Cigue
Half a pie = Pi
Full pie = 2 *Pi
three quarters of a pie = 3/2 * Pi

That's WAY better for a toddler than going "this is 180, this is 360, this is 270"


Just tell them that full pie = 360 degrees…then they'll figure out the rest on their own…

Cigue

2010-08-05 21:06:13

From: Santa_Clause
Just tell them that full pie = 360 degrees…then they'll figure out the rest on their own…


In before a generation completely made of pimps and hookers

(Trolling aside, the same applies for radians, plus when you know radians the functions of circle area and circonference become intuitive)

souldragon

2010-09-01 05:19:20

Sin $ = cos $ False? Of course its false…..

Sin (90 - $) = sin $ False

Sin (90 + $) cos $ True

Sin (-$) = cos($) False

Sin (180 + $) = Sin($) False