SRL Archive - Suggestions

Turning the include, with simba, into a standalone .exe


Naike

2010-06-08 16:26:20

Would be a beast.
And save me some time..

Any advice would be appreciated, as of now, I have no clue what so ever, how to step further.

nielsie95

2010-06-08 17:24:50

What exactly are you planning to do?

Naike

2010-06-08 17:52:36

Haven't really decided..

And for the record, does that even matter?
I won't hax viruses into it, if that's what you're asking me.
and I won't start releasing my scripts in .exe's.

Anything else everyone is concerned about?? as it's just not nielsie asking these questions..

Would just be fun to know, experiment with.

Coh3n

2010-06-08 17:58:55

There's a guide somewhere about making any script an executable, I'm sure something similar can be done for the include.

Narcle

2010-06-08 18:01:13

You want a .exe installer or an all in one exe with the include already in it?

Naike

2010-06-08 18:31:28

a one exe with the include already in it.

nielsie95

2010-06-08 18:55:26

From: Naike
Haven't really decided..

And for the record, does that even matter?
I won't hax viruses into it, if that's what you're asking me.
and I won't start releasing my scripts in .exe's.

Anything else everyone is concerned about?? as it's just not nielsie asking these questions..

Would just be fun to know, experiment with.


Yes, it does matter, because there are several solutions. If you really want to compile SRL, you'll have to port SRL to FPC. Now, that wont be very hard to do, but it wont be very easy either. If you just want to run a script without the source being visible, you could use MML or if you're really lazy you could use Simba and hide the editor.