Wizzup?
2009-10-25 17:28:23
Basically, there isn't much to do, until we finish the last parts that are either missing or known to be buggy. When this is done, we should all use the same binary, rather than compile mufasa ourselves. Compiling it yourself is nice when you are developing; but for testing it is better if we all use the same binary.
There have already been several issues with older FPC compilers, and different architectures, that are known to give errors. Raymond and I have correct and up to date compilers, so it would be best if we just produce the binaries for now.
For the ones who want to develop with an older FPC (2.2.2 and possibly 2.2.4), you can use the project in MufasaTests, since it uses no Pascal Script. This should fix any issues you may have with the GUI that uses Pascal Script.
There have already been several issues with older FPC compilers, and different architectures, that are known to give errors. Raymond and I have correct and up to date compilers, so it would be best if we just produce the binaries for now.
For the ones who want to develop with an older FPC (2.2.2 and possibly 2.2.4), you can use the project in MufasaTests, since it uses no Pascal Script. This should fix any issues you may have with the GUI that uses Pascal Script.