SRL Archive - News and General

Seeing as the original thread was locked:

No, just because they can does not mean they should. I know bureaucracy slows things down, but it would certainly be preferable seeing as how the ops (except for Jason2gs, sometimes Widget) act.

Your thoughts are similar to: "I have a gun, so I will shoot you."

Y'know, maybe the original thread was locked for a reason?

Yes, because they could. A discussion was still going on. I will keep complaining.

The reason was because they wanted the discussion to end. Don't do what Ice did…

Yes. They may want it to end, but that does not mean they are right. I will continue with my argument. Please stop trying to stop me and get back on topic.

The gun statement is completely different. Not even in context.

Why don't you PM instead?
:) to like the head Admin or w/e of the IRC.

<3 hopefully everything will be okay for you.

What the fuck? Yes it is. If an op bans me just because he can, that's pretty much shooting someone just because you have a gun.

All that statement tells me is that it's the best thing you could come up with and you don't have a real reason.

From: R0b0t1
What the fuck? Yes it is. If an op bans me just because he can, that's pretty much shooting someone just because you have a gun.

All that statement tells me is that it's the best thing you could come up with and you don't have a real reason.

calm down dude lol, your going to end up with a infraction or warning , chill :)

From: R0b0t1
Your thoughts are similar to: "I have a gun, so I will shoot you."

Lets continue the gun debate then.
It is statistically proven that if you got a gun, you are likely to shoot it. There's a clear correlation between gun ownership and gun usage. This all (also) has to do with human nature: we use what we got.
K?

From: R0b0t1
What the fuck? Yes it is. If an op bans me just because he can, that's pretty much shooting someone just because you have a gun.

All that statement tells me is that it's the best thing you could come up with and you don't have a real reason.

There is a humongous difference between a temporary ban that isn't against the law and the taking of a life, which is, besides being illegal, going against humans natural rights(life). Terrible analogy is terrible(and doesn't even fit).

If you don't like how the ops at the IRC act, then don't go there. It is as simple as that. They have ops because they were chosen to be a moderator there, so it is their discretion, and Hobbit was probably sick of the drama and wanted it to end. So Blum and you were banned within reason.

From: mormonman
There is a humongous difference between a temporary ban that isn't against the law and the taking of a life, which is, besides being illegal, going against humans natural rights(life). Terrible analogy is terrible(and doesn't even fit).

If you don't like how the ops at the IRC act, then don't go there. It is as simple as that. They have ops because they were chosen to be a moderator there, so it is their discretion, and Hobbit was probably sick of the drama and wanted it to end. So Blum and you were banned within reason.

/thread.

You agree to the op's rule when you join #SRL. So don't go there if you don't like it.

I personally hate complainers, if your not happy keep it to yourself and don't use IRC. Simple.

Just use MSN if you want to talk to certain people..

I will repeat it again and say the IRC is not needed. Just more drama.

Look what I can do!