The Claw
2009-07-27 14:57:16
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/AT%26T_Blocks_4chan
2009-07-27 14:57:16
2009-07-27 14:59:53
2009-07-27 15:00:21
2009-07-27 15:01:10
2009-07-27 15:02:13
From: The Claw
No, we should fight for our right to uncensored internet.
2009-07-27 15:02:18
2009-07-27 15:03:22
2009-07-27 15:14:23
From: cycrosism
You don't live in america why does it concern you
2009-07-27 15:18:34
From: The Claw
No, we should fight for our right to uncensored internet.
2009-07-27 15:28:34
2009-07-27 19:41:30
2009-07-27 19:51:57
2009-07-27 19:53:50
From: Markus
Just a matter of time before /b/ launches a big action/raid/whatever to get unrestricted internet access again.
2009-07-27 19:56:41
2009-07-27 20:00:52
From: Markus
Just a matter of time before /b/ launches a big action/raid/whatever to get unrestricted internet access again.
2009-07-27 20:05:28
2009-07-27 20:13:05
2009-07-27 20:14:16
2009-07-27 20:21:46
2009-07-27 20:38:38
2009-07-27 20:41:46
From: ~~Joker~~
Didn't obama say something about the internet security too?
well he said to stop or lower down bootleg videos lol, like that's going to happen…
2009-07-27 20:46:18
From: noidea
Obama's a fucking terrorist.
This health care plan is spending more than its saving, and this internet "security" is bullshit.
2009-07-27 21:17:30
2009-07-27 21:19:22
From: legendaryhero90Because they removed it before they got raped by /b/tards
i think its a joke on 4chan's part.
AT&T (SBC Yahoo) is my ISP and they havent blocked off any part of 4chan for me.
everyone just needs to clam down. -.-
2009-07-27 21:46:55
2009-07-27 21:47:55
From: Ouivile
what are /b/ and r9k sites?
cuz im pretty sure im ok with the US blocking terrorist weapon selling sites….
2009-07-27 21:58:54
2009-07-27 22:00:45
2009-07-27 22:06:09
2009-07-27 22:43:20
From: The Claw
Because this affects the whole world. If even 1 ISP (in a non-third world country, not like china or finland or whatever) is allowed to get away with it then before you know it it will be blocked here too. And who's to say they'll stop at 4chan? If they get away with blocking 4chan, they'll get away with blocking warez, sites on political/ethical issues etc. Basically whatever they decide.
2009-07-27 22:44:03
2009-07-27 23:54:01
From: GoF
In Finland they're just blocking sites containing child pornography, as far as I know, and there was some stuff about some law that if you work for some big corporation your employer could read your work email.
Also, I wouldn't care too much even if the whole world would block 4chan, as I don't go there too much anymore because I'm pretty tired with the porn, kids spamming stuff to be cool on the internet, old jokes everyone's heard and seen a 1000 times already, gore that even 5 year olds are immune to these days, and I don't need to go there to get some feeling of power and belonging from the "WE ARE ANONYMOUS WE ARE LEGION WOO WE RULE AND WE'RE SO COOL LULZ" crap due to real life. I do visit some finnish "alternatives" because there aren't tons and tons of people there spamming 24/7 (chance of some actual discussion) and there aren't too many 13 year olds there.
2009-07-27 23:59:25
2009-07-28 00:01:05
From: GoF
In Finland they're just blocking sites containing child pornography, as far as I know, and there was some stuff about some law that if you work for some big corporation your employer could read your work email.
From: GoF
Also, I wouldn't care too much even if the whole world would block 4chan, as I don't go there too much anymore because I'm pretty tired with the porn, kids spamming stuff to be cool on the internet, old jokes everyone's heard and seen a 1000 times already, gore that even 5 year olds are immune to these days, and I don't need to go there to get some feeling of power and belonging from the "WE ARE ANONYMOUS WE ARE LEGION WOO WE RULE AND WE'RE SO COOL LULZ" crap due to real life. I do visit some finnish "alternatives" because there aren't tons and tons of people there spamming 24/7 (chance of some actual discussion) and there aren't too many 13 year olds there.
2009-07-28 03:16:47
2009-07-28 03:34:33
2009-07-28 04:19:15
2009-07-28 06:02:10
2009-07-28 06:20:11
2009-07-28 07:00:15
From: lancerawks aka Lance
what is a DDos / Dos btw? i know it has to do with attacking a server somehow, by over rideing it with requests?
2009-07-29 02:42:15
2009-07-29 02:57:22
2009-07-29 17:44:58
From: sk8terbitu
p2p web hostiong??? fuck the law. the internet if for everyone and its free of law.
2009-07-29 18:02:53
From: Laur€ns
It totally isn't.. Okay, lets make spam legal, have hacking sites everywhere and remove all spamfilters!! YAY!!!
2009-07-29 18:25:01
2009-07-29 19:26:47
From: Laur€nsLets add other ignorant people to the Internet too! YAY!
It totally isn't.. Okay, lets make spam legal, have hacking sites everywhere and remove all spamfilters!! YAY!!!
2009-07-29 19:41:42
From: Hugolord
4chan isn't a hacking site lol?
2009-07-29 20:05:26
From: senrath
It's not. It just happens to have some hackers and crackers hanging out on it.
2009-07-29 21:24:28
From: Wizzup?
I think that people abuse the word `hacker' too often. A cracker cracks and steals things, a hacker is just a term for a person who never stops learning and tries to solve (hard) problems, and much more… Just read the article: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html
2009-07-29 21:27:17
From: Wizzup?
I think that people abuse the word `hacker' too often. A cracker cracks and steals things, a hacker is just a term for a person who never stops learning and tries to solve (hard) problems, and much more… Just read the article: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html
2009-07-29 21:32:16
From: Hermen
I see you posting that every-time, it's just that people see movies and they learn hackers are people with nice computers that can hack the FBI in 1 sec.
2009-07-31 02:16:00
Here's what happened:
For the past three weeks, 4chan has been under a constant DDoS attack. We were able to filter this specific type of attack in a fashion that was more or less transparent to the end user.
Unfortunately, as an unintended consequence of the method used, some Internet users received errant traffic from one of our network switches. A handful happened to be AT&T customers.
In response, AT&T filtered all traffic to and from our img.4chan.org IPs (which serve /b/ & /r9k/) for their entire network, instead of only the affected customers. AT&T did not contact us prior to implementing the block. Here is their statement regarding the matter.
In the end, this wasn't a sinister act of censorship, but rather a bit of a mistake and a poorly executed, disproportionate response on AT&T's part. Whoever pulled the trigger on blackholing the site probably didn't anticipate [nor intend] the consequences of doing so.
We're glad to see this short-lived debacle has prompted renewed interest and debate over net neutrality and internet censorship—two very important issues that don't get nearly enough attention—so perhaps this was all just a blessing in disguise.
Aside from that, I'll also add that there is some big news due later this week. Keep an eye on the News page, Twitter, and global message for updates.
As always, I can be reached at [email]moot@4chan.org[/email].
2009-07-31 05:26:21
From: Feroc1ty
source: status.4chan.org
2009-07-31 05:35:34
From: The Claw
Because this affects the whole world. If even 1 ISP (in a non-third world country, not like china or finland or whatever) is allowed to get away with it then before you know it it will be blocked here too. And who's to say they'll stop at 4chan? If they get away with blocking 4chan, they'll get away with blocking warez, sites on political/ethical issues etc. Basically whatever they decide.
2009-07-31 05:46:04
From: legendaryhero90
like i said… its probably a prank on 4ch's part.
2009-07-31 10:05:26
From: senrath
Except that it wasn't, you know, a prank.
2009-07-31 10:14:47
From: legendaryhero90
then what is it!?
terrorists' taking over the net?
massive hackers DDoS-ing the world's servers?
i dont think so.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10296152-36.html
2009-08-04 05:08:21