SRL Archive - SRL Archives

Two functions which would come in handy for someone with a poor internet connection.

What they do are check if you are connected to Runescape, via the Lost Connection box in the top left of your screen.

Connected just returns true or false depending on whether you are connected or not.

WaitForConnection again returns true if you are connected. If you are not connected though, it will wait MaxWaitMS to become connected. If it does not become connected after waiting, it returns false.

Please do not hassle me about using a DTM; it is the first method which popped into my mind. Anyway, when I tested it, it only took

Successfully compiled (234 ms)

to compile.

{*******************************************************************************
function LostConnection : Boolean;
By: R1ch
Description: Checks if you are not connected to RS. Returns true if you are NOT connected.
*******************************************************************************}
function LostConnection : Boolean;
var
  X, Y , Con : Integer;

begin
  Con := DTMFromString('78DA63D4606060E061C00A1861B4079060439' +
       '5FBFFFF3FAA9A4820C145408D1390E025A0460D48F01150234F84' +
       '39224498C341841A90BF3908A81125C2EF2A408293801A7DC2E10' +
       'C0098072353');
  Result:= FindDTM(Con, X, Y , 0, 0, 250, 75)
  FreeDTM(Con);
end;

{*******************************************************************************
function WaitForConnection(MaxWaitMS : Integer) : Boolean;
By: R1ch
Description: Checks if you are connected to RS. Returns true if you are.
             If you are not, waits MaxWaitMS to become connected.
*******************************************************************************}
function WaitForConnection(MaxWaitMS : Integer) : Boolean;
var
  I : Integer;
begin
  I := GetSystemTime;
  while (GetSystemTime - I) < MaxWaitMS do
  begin
    Result:= not(LostConnection);
    if Result then
      Exit;
    Wait(Random(15));
  end;
end;

Comments?

Would be more logical to have NotConnected since you are connected most of the time :D.

But:

{*******************************************************************************
function WaitForConnection(MaxWaitMS : Integer) : Boolean;
By: R1ch
Description: Checks if you are connected to RS. Returns true if you are.
             If you are not, waits MaxWaitMS to become connected.
*******************************************************************************}
function WaitForConnection(MaxWaitMS : Integer) : Boolean;
var
  I : Integer;
begin
  i := GetSystemTime;
  while GetSystemTime - i < MaxWaitMS do
  begin
    result := Connected;
    if result then
      exit;
    Wait(Random(16));
  end;
end;

:D

I'll keep Connected, but I've also added NotConnected.

EDIT: Shortened WaitForConnection.

Check my edit.

unction NotConnected : Boolean;
var
  X, Y , Con : Integer;

begin
  Con := DTMFromString('78DA63D4606060E061C00A1861B4079060439' +
       '5FBFFFF3FAA9A4820C145408D1390E025A0460D48F01150234F84' +
       '39224498C341841A90BF3908A81125C2EF2A408293801A7DC2E10' +
       'C0098072353');
  Result:= FindDTM(Con, X, Y , 0, 0, 250, 75)
  FreeDTM(Con);
end;

->

function NotConnected : boolean;
begin
  result := not Connected;
end;

Meh, I don't see why I didn't do that to be honest.

Thanks,
Richard.

Why have both Connected and NotConnected? if you're not connected then Connected would result false…

From: Zyt3x
Why have both Connected and NotConnected? if you're not connected then Connected would result false…

That to me is like saying why have TypeSend as well as TypeSendEx. I get what you're saying, but in my opinion, it just makes things easier.

From: R1ch
That to me is like saying why have TypeSend as well as TypeSendEx. I get what you're saying, but in my opinion, it just makes things easier.

There's actually a logic behind TypeSendEx/TypeSend.

Not trying to start an argument here, but instead of using TypeSend('bla'); you could use TypeSendEx('bla', True');. All TypeSend is is

procedure TypeSend(Text : string);
begin
  TypeSendEx(Text, True);
end

It's the same concept with these.

It's up to the Devs whether they get in or not anyway, so if they feel it doesn't need to be there, they don't add it.

From: R1ch
That to me is like saying why have TypeSend as well as TypeSendEx. I get what you're saying, but in my opinion, it just makes things easier.

So therefore in your opinion we should have one LoggedIn and one NotLoggedIn?

I think we should just have one…

@ Zytex: What does it matter anyway? All I'm trying to do is help, and I get flamed for it. It's just stupid. It's up to the Devs, not you.

@ Kyle: Which one?

NotConnected ;).

Fine. I give in. I've removed Connected, and renamed NotConnected to LostConnection.