SRL Archive - News and General

well, i was just thinking to myself, and i find this way to be more efficient and easier to add / remove players!

Procedure DeclarePlayers;
begin

  NumberOfPlayers(1);
  CurrentPlayer := 0;

  with Players[0] do
  begin
    Name :='Rasta Magician';
    Pass :='My Password';
    Nick :='agic';
    Active := true;
    Booleans[0] := true; //bank hides
    Booleans[1] := true; //food in bank
  end;

  with Players[1] do
  begin
    Name :='RMagician';
    Pass :='His Password';
    Nick :='cia';
    Active := true;
    Booleans[0] := true; //bank hides
    Booleans[1] := true; //food in bank
  end;


end;

what do you guys think? it's easier to add players cus you don't have to go changing all the Players[0]. …

~RM

I agree that it's easier..
But i'm so hooked to the old one ;P

Support tho.

Hmmm yes i do like this, would be much more convenient.

I feel stupid.. But could someone show it with like 4 players (:


~Home

Procedure DeclarePlayers;
begin

  NumberOfPlayers(4);
  CurrentPlayer := 0;

  with Players[0] do
  begin
    Name :='Rasta Magician';
    Pass :='My Password';
    Nick :='agic';
    Active := true;
    Booleans[0] := true; //bank hides
    Booleans[1] := true; //food in bank
  end;
  
  with Players[1] do
  begin
    Name :='RM Example';
    Pass :='pass';
    Nick :='ampl';
    Active := true;
    Booleans[0] := true; //bank hides
    Booleans[1] := true; //food in bank
  end;
  
  with Players[2] do
  begin
    Name :='lakialiko';
    Pass :='pass';
    Nick :='kial';
    Active := true;
    Booleans[0] := true; //bank hides
    Booleans[1] := true; //food in bank
  end;
  
  with Players[3] do
  begin
    Name :='numotiol';
    Pass :='pass';
    Nick :='umot';
    Active := true;
    Booleans[0] := true; //bank hides
    Booleans[1] := true; //food in bank
  end;

end;

Hobbit raped me by 10 secs..

Edit, you failed at 4th player ;P

Procedure DeclarePlayers;
begin

  NumberOfPlayers(4);
  CurrentPlayer := 0;

  with Players[0] do
  begin
    Name :='Rasta Magician';
    Pass :='My Password';
    Nick :='agic';
    Active := true;
    Booleans[0] := true; //bank hides
    Booleans[1] := true; //food in bank
  end;
  
  with Players[1] do
  begin
    Name :='Rasta Magician2';
    Pass :='My Password';
    Nick :='agic';
    Active := true;
    Booleans[0] := true; //bank hides
    Booleans[1] := true; //food in bank
  end;
  
  with Players[2] do
  begin
    Name :='Rasta Magician3';
    Pass :='My Password';
    Nick :='agic';
    Active := true;
    Booleans[0] := true; //bank hides
    Booleans[1] := true; //food in bank
  end;
  
  with Players[3] do
  begin
    Name :='Rasta Magician3';
    Pass :='My Password';
    Nick :='agic';
    Active := true;
    Booleans[0] := true; //bank hides
    Booleans[1] := true; //food in bank
  end;

end;

Ooh, very shmexy. I definitely support this; it must be so much easier to use than having to change all those 0s in 1s etc.

Richard

Nah, who cares.
Why change it everyone is used to change it.
And it's not like you can't handle it isn't?

well, it's really the scripters choice. I know i'll be doing it this way.

~RM

+++++++++++1
RM ur smart ;)
lovin this!!!

I'm fine with the current way.
Though this is a pretty neat thing

yeah tbh both are okay :) i may just use this way for a change hehe

So simple yet so efficient. How didn't we thought about this earlier? Cool find :P

So simple yet so efficient. How didn't we thought about this earlier? Cool find :P

People have used this already. Someone showed me how to do it. I just didnt :p

GJ Publicifying it RM.

Pass it around, with..do statements win.

I don't like it. People have been using they array-way since SRL's creation.
People are always suggesting these new ways, and I never seem to like it :(

From: noidea
I don't like it. People have been using they array-way since SRL's creation.
People are always suggesting these new ways, and I never seem to like it :(

it still is an array -.-

I've already done this in some private scripts. It is much easier.

More lines of code, less letters (maybe not even less total letters with all the statements though?)

Does look much neater though.

Ooh! I love with…do I've used it in many of my scripts where I used Types to define things such as cutting areas. I never thought of applying them to this though! Spread the word.

From: Rasta Magician
well, it's really the scripters choice. I know i'll be doing it this way.

~RM

Ill do half the other way and half this wayy ;)