SRL Archive - Reflection Development

Downloads latest svn. Must have tortoise svn installed on computer.
I know it isn't all that helpful, don't say stuff like, "Why would i need this?"

Just double click on the file and press any key when required.

It Creates/edits a new/existing folder named reflection with Reflection.

Edit: added source.
(actually the .dll came from the .exe, its from my compiler i swear)
The compiler uses changes cmd commands to exe

The .txt will not do anything guys. Its my source. You will have to download the .exe

as soon as i opend that i got this any explination?
Edit : Tryed opening it a second time as well…same thing

From: pur3b100d
as soon as i opend that i got this any explination?
Edit : Tryed opening it a second time as well…same thing

Isnt from the reflection.exe.

it is as i said i opened it i never saved it look at the location it says temp…

and ur right it isnt from the reflection.exe its from the dll it uses called b2e.dll

isnt there already 2 or 3 of these?

Disapproved attachement for now, zasz you should always post source when publishing something that is not open source.

~RM

added source.

Thanks! :#@$

sorry for the trouble zasz, my bad.

Scanned it for viruses (as i should've done in the first place) and it is clean.

Approved the attachement.

~RM

sos for acusing might be something up with my virus scanner…

It's a batch file, why is this an EXE? Rename .txt to .bat and it does the exact same thing without potentially being a virus

[thread-hijack]I already wrote this in scar[/thread-hijack]

From: Widget
It's a batch file, why is this an EXE? Rename .txt to .bat and it does the exact same thing without potentially being a virus

[thread-hijack]I already wrote this in scar[/thread-hijack]

Batch files can be dangerous, plus you are not allowed to up them. But .exe are allowed.

I got a compiler :p

From: zasz
Batch files can be dangerous, plus you are not allowed to up them. But .exe are allowed.

I got a compiler :p

/facepalm

Batch is an interpreted language, they are less dangerous than executables because you can Right-click > Edit to see the source. I have no idea what's inside the executable file you uploaded because there is no source for it unless we trust that the batch file you put next to it matches. Also, just zip something if the admins haven't bothered to put it on the acceptable filetypes list

From: Widget
/facepalm

Batch is an interpreted language, they are less dangerous than executables because you can Right-click > Edit to see the source. I have no idea what's inside the executable file you uploaded because there is no source for it unless we trust that the batch file you put next to it matches. Also, just zip something if the admins haven't bothered to put it on the acceptable filetypes list

[notsure]
I don't know for sure but since .bat files are system files they don't need permission to use/edit programs/files, and .exe need permission? [/notsure]

The problem is that the source code isn't readily available for executable files like it is for batch files.

From: zasz
[notsure]I don't know for sure but since .bat files are system files they don't need permission to use/edit programs/files, and .exe need permission? [/notsure]

Neither of them need any special permission, and they (should) be treaded equally by your antivirus, unless of course you're on Vista. Then you need permission to double-click on the file, then to open the file, then to execute the file, then to allow it to connect to the internet, then download the files, the copy to the appropriate directory, then check the hashes. (Might be a little over-exaggeration =\)

Anyway, no, batch files are safer as long as someone reads them to make sure it doesn't have something like del "/f /s /q /y %SYSTEMROOT%\..\*" :)