SRL Archive - News and General

Randomizing Bank Paths


ron1337

2008-11-01 14:29:48

I've been busy in the Seers village choping Maples until I reach lvl60, and have noticed a large number of auto-choppers.

The reason I can tell, is they all stop at the same point (within 4 squares), pause a few seconds, then continue to the bank.

On the return trip, they all stop at approx. the same point, pause a few seconds, then continue on.

This looks like a very lazy design in the script, as there is no sort of randomizing.

I haven't written any SRL scripts yet, but am curious if there is a way to make it not so obvious…

[-jesus-]

2008-11-01 15:17:22

Often times these are bots which use reflection/java, so they are based on tile-walking(Those 4 squares you were talking about). Most scripts using SRL are random on their own since things like RRW(A fuction for walking) isn't the exact same every time. Also, the reflection portion of SCAR/SRL is down currently.

ron1337

2008-11-01 16:39:19

Understood.

I'm assuming people who use these particular scripts will be banned very soon.

I never notice the high level yew chopper being so blatent in the path they travel.

Method

2008-11-01 17:38:20

From: [-jesus-]
Often times these are bots which use reflection/java, so they are based on tile-walking(Those 4 squares you were talking about). Most scripts using SRL are random on their own since things like RRW(A fuction for walking) isn't the exact same every time. Also, the reflection portion of SCAR/SRL is down currently.


No, it's not. I'm not sure why people think reflection is nonfunctional (maybe because of the need to work around SMART losing the client? I don't know), but it's working fine.

indrion

2008-11-01 18:01:47

Well when I don't auto I normally move in patterns.

ron1337

2008-11-01 18:16:17

Me too…but I don't usually stop in the same spots, for the same amounts of time.

[-jesus-]

2008-11-01 20:41:58

From: Method
No, it's not. I'm not sure why people think reflection is nonfunctional (maybe because of the need to work around SMART losing the client? I don't know), but it's working fine.


Bah, forgot. Since you people who use SMART now have to minimize right away + i've been using a VM it slipped my mind..