Smart
Nava2
2008-10-24 08:38:59
So, there is a way for it to work.
Some know, most don't.
Should we tell everyone, members, jr members or… Yeah! :)
Please vote.
The currently released version works, with a trick.
Bonfield
2008-10-24 08:43:15
im not sure, maybe we should go to the old way of smart boing members only but its not like ppl were abusing rs because of smart so im undecided
btw what is the trick to get smart to work?
is this it or something else
{*******************************************************************************
procedure ResetRS;
By: RSN/Nava2
Description: Finds RS Window and sets a timer to repeat every one second.
*******************************************************************************}
procedure ResetRS;
begin
Result := FindWindowBySize(766, 504);
SetTimeOut(1, 'ResetRS');
end;
Bobarkinator
2008-10-24 08:51:48
From: Bonfield
im not sure, maybe we should go to the old way of smart boing members only but its not like ppl were abusing rs because of smart so im undecided
btw what is the trick to get smart to work?
is this it or something else
{*******************************************************************************
procedure ResetRS;
By: RSN/Nava2
Description: Finds RS Window and sets a timer to repeat every one second.
*******************************************************************************}
procedure ResetRS;
begin
Result := FindWindowBySize(766, 504);
SetTimeOut(1, 'ResetRS');
end;
That only works if you are autoing on the client. The trick is a different one.
Bonfield
2008-10-24 08:53:22
ok, would you like to share it =]
Narcle
2008-10-24 10:12:41
Well I'm telling the members right now. Because I don't think its that great of a trick, nor convenient. :p
This is how you can use SMART: (tested myself and running it now)
- Close all current SCARs.
- Open a fresh one with the script.
- Enter your info.
- Push play.
- When SMART pops up, immediately minimize it.
That's it! Just keep SMART minimized and it'll continue. [Creds to Hyper for mentioning it]
You could alternatively use CopyClientToBitmap, and debug it on the DebugImage of SCAR, just draw it every 5 seconds or so? (So you can actually keep track of what is happening)
P1nky
2008-10-24 10:28:42
eh or specific members get smart and idk a test in order to get..
(a another app for SMART) ;P
lol idk but some members would leak it, like previous.
Laur€ns
2008-10-24 10:30:04
SRL Members only, I'd say.
boberman
2008-10-24 10:33:17
There's no reason to make it a members only thing, especially now that it is in the wild. It would be a good perk, but it would kill the reputation of SRL pretty quickly.
P1nky
2008-10-24 10:43:07
From: boberman
There's no reason to make it a members only thing, especially now that it is in the wild. It would be a good perk, but it would kill the reputation of SRL pretty quickly.
what you mean , how would it kill the rep :O?
its like NEXUS lite and heavy
Nava2
2008-10-24 10:55:27
Maybe have the copy client to canvas thing members only?
P.S. Using recursion for this would be a good idea.
Boreas
2008-10-24 11:02:34
I think the way with the least confusion, mess, and unneeded posts is to wait until Ben has time to fix the canvas issue, and SRL has a SmartSetupEx that will work with new SMART and old scripts.
Wait til Ben casts his vote, which counts as 200 votes.
Narcle
2008-10-24 12:13:23
From: Boreas
I think the way with the least confusion, mess, and unneeded posts is to wait until Ben has time to fix the canvas issue, and SRL has a SmartSetupEx that will work with new SMART and old scripts.
Wait til Ben casts his vote, which counts as 200 votes.
Exactly. The new SmartSetupEx is compatible with all previous scripts.
Don't start making weird functions just to run the current SMART. If you want to make your own that's fine, but don't post it up imo. Lets just wait until new Smart is out.
HyperSecret
2008-10-24 13:37:46
Is it really that big of an issue? It is still minimizable and isn't that the point of having SMART? Now it's just when you maximize it you have to restart SMART…but SMART is meant to be minimized, I don't maximize mine until I want to stop it or I know it's been stopped by SCAR Debug information.
Do this many people really sit and watch SCAR/SMART auto? Isn't the whole point of this is to minimize the window and let it do its thing while you aren't their? or have it minimized while doing something else on the computer…
Nava2
2008-10-24 13:40:32
It is nice to check up on it.
Edit:
Btw, this is what I have for the viewing smart while minimized.. Doens't work. If someone wants to make it work, go for it! :)
program New;
{.include SRL/SRL/misc/SMART.scar}
{.include SRL/SRL.scar}
procedure ShowClient;
var
Client : Integer;
C : TCanvas;
begin
Client := BitmapFromString(766, 506, '');
C := GetBitmapCanvas(Client);
C.Handle := SMARTGetDC;
SafeCopyCanvas(C, GetDebugCanvas, 0, 0, 766, 506, 0, 0, 766, 506);
FreeBitmap(Client);
SetTimeout(3, 'ShowClient');
end;
{procedure SetShowClient(time : Integer);
var
V : TVariantArray;
begin
V := [];
ThreadSafeCall('ShowClient', V);
end; }
begin
SetupSRL;
LoadSMART(115, True, True);
Wait(2000);
DisplayDebugImgWindow(766, 506);
ShowClient;
repeat
Wait(500);
until False;
end.
Narcle
2008-10-24 14:26:04
From: HyperSecret
Is it really that big of an issue? It is still minimizable and isn't that the point of having SMART? Now it's just when you maximize it you have to restart SMART…but SMART is meant to be minimized, I don't maximize mine until I want to stop it or I know it's been stopped by SCAR Debug information.
Do this many people really sit and watch SCAR/SMART auto? Isn't the whole point of this is to minimize the window and let it do its thing while you aren't their? or have it minimized while doing something else on the computer…
Just need a flawless script. Also I can't bloody test my scripts. I mainly wanted to get TTiles flawless, but RS update screwed that plan up for the moment. >.<
HyperSecret
2008-10-24 14:32:05
From: Narcle
Just need a flawless script. Also I can't bloody test my scripts. I mainly wanted to get TTiles flawless, but RS update screwed that plan up for the moment. >.<
Got plenty of them ;)
Narcle
2008-10-24 14:43:08
From: HyperSecret
Got plenty of them ;)
:rolleyes:
boberman
2008-10-24 15:09:09
From: ~~Joker~~
what you mean , how would it kill the rep :O?
its like NEXUS lite and heavy
SRL needs something to bring people in. IMO SMART is one of the biggest things to do that as it is a VERY nice feature for autoing. Yes, it isn't required, but it makes things a whole lot easier in the long run.
People don't like it when they are given something and they have it taken away. If smart became members only there could be a fair amount of junior members, even long time junior members, that decide to leave.
And what would be the point? To have an exclusive club of people that can download a program? Why should the free tools available to all be just limited to some? Should we make SCAR members only as well (not that you could). Or should we release a non-members version of SRL that's not as good as the members version?
I don't think so. Membership means you can code well and that you contribute. There shouldn't be some coding prize given to members, it just creates a disconnect between members and jr members that really doesn't help the community out as a whole.
And for what? Less people posting because they can't get smart to work? If that's the case, then think of all the posts that would start to flood the boards when all available scripts that use smart don't work anymore.
noidea
2008-10-24 15:26:25
Keep the availability the same imo. It's rediculous to give it to jrs and bellow, then take it away.
Twisted
2008-10-24 16:33:28
i can't even get it up. it says error starting smart, check world prefix.
A G E N T
2008-10-24 17:17:08
None.
I have no problem with waiting a week or two until BenLand fixes it, and a new rev comes out.
TravisV10
2008-10-24 17:34:08
Totally SRL Members. I think that SMART should have restrictions to junior members in the first place.
To be honest, there isn't a good motive to be a SRL Member.
Cazax
2008-10-24 17:41:23
From: Nava2
It is nice to check up on it.
Edit:
Btw, this is what I have for the viewing smart while minimized.. Doens't work. If someone wants to make it work, go for it! :)
program New;
{.include SRL/SRL/misc/SMART.scar}
{.include SRL/SRL.scar}
procedure ShowClient;
var
Client : Integer;
C : TCanvas;
begin
Client := BitmapFromString(766, 506, '');
C := GetBitmapCanvas(Client);
C.Handle := SMARTGetDC;
SafeCopyCanvas(C, GetDebugCanvas, 0, 0, 766, 506, 0, 0, 766, 506);
FreeBitmap(Client);
SetTimeout(3, 'ShowClient');
end;
{procedure SetShowClient(time : Integer);
var
V : TVariantArray;
begin
V := [];
ThreadSafeCall('ShowClient', V);
end; }
begin
SetupSRL;
LoadSMART(115, True, True);
Wait(2000);
DisplayDebugImgWindow(766, 506);
ShowClient;
repeat
Wait(500);
until False;
end.
That worked for me lol
Nava2
2008-10-24 18:56:42
From: Cazax
That worked for me lol
Did it work for more than like five frames?
Iron Man
2008-10-24 19:27:27
Why keep it members only? BenLand100 will most likely have SMART completely fixed in not too long, so this will not be a benefit for SRL members for long anyways. If it does take him a while to fix it, I'm sure a junior member will eventually find this out.
I already knew this and thought everyone knew that you just had to minimize it right away, I guess this explains why everyone still thought/thinks SMART is broken…
My vote is to release it to juniors/everyone, I don't think there is a good enough reason to keep it "secret".
Why give a child a cookie, then say if he wants more he has to do a complex math problem (for his age) to time it right so his mom won't find out, when all he has to do is run fast.
Shuttleu
2008-10-24 19:33:05
From: Twisted
i can't even get it up. it says error starting smart, check world prefix.
http://www.villavu.com/forum/showthread.php?t=36898~shut
EDIT:
From: Nava2
It is nice to check up on it.
Edit:
Btw, this is what I have for the viewing smart while minimized.. Doens't work. If someone wants to make it work, go for it! :)
program New;
{.include SRL/SRL/misc/SMART.scar}
{.include SRL/SRL.scar}
procedure ShowClient;
var
Client : Integer;
C : TCanvas;
begin
Client := BitmapFromString(766, 506, '');
C := GetBitmapCanvas(Client);
C.Handle := SMARTGetDC;
SafeCopyCanvas(C, GetDebugCanvas, 0, 0, 766, 506, 0, 0, 766, 506);
FreeBitmap(Client);
SetTimeout(3, 'ShowClient');
end;
{procedure SetShowClient(time : Integer);
var
V : TVariantArray;
begin
V := [];
ThreadSafeCall('ShowClient', V);
end; }
begin
SetupSRL;
LoadSMART(115, True, True);
Wait(2000);
DisplayDebugImgWindow(766, 506);
ShowClient;
repeat
Wait(500);
until False;
end.
works perfectly
now using it on hys fight caver :)
i told you it was because your computer was shitty but you didnt believe me :p
TravisV10
2008-10-24 19:50:30
From: Iron man
Why keep it members only? BenLand100 will most likely have SMART completely fixed in not too long, so this will not be a benefit for SRL members for long anyways. If it does take him a while to fix it, I'm sure a junior member will eventually find this out.
I already knew this and thought everyone knew that you just had to minimize it right away, I guess this explains why everyone still thought/thinks SMART is broken…
My vote is to release it to juniors/everyone, I don't think there is a good enough reason to keep it secret.
Why give a child a cookie, then say if he wants more he has to do a complex math problem (for his age) to time it right so his mom won't find out, when all he has to do is run fast.
Because someone had to work for/bake the cookie and would like something in return.
(ie srl in turn wants u to create a script for a script. eye for an eye if you will)
Iron Man
2008-10-24 20:19:12
From: TravisV10
Because someone had to work for/bake the cookie and would like something in return.
(ie srl in turn wants u to create a script for a script. eye for an eye if you will)
But were not telling juniors that we have a fix, we are saying that they have to re-create SMART themselves if they want it, or at least that's how I see it.
This far, BenLand100 has not voted, so the person who worked to make it has not quite said that he wants something in return, other thanks and a job well done (he might though). It was HIS choice to release publicly, and I believe there was a greater reason behind it other than "he just felt like it". So you do not know if "the person who had to work for/bake" the cookie wants something in return, other than the a smile on the child's face, since it necessarily wasn't the careful mother who baked them.
The child will eventually find out that the math problem is actually quite simple when he goes to attempt it, then will not redo the math problem to make it safer & faster ;)
EDIT: But again, this is and should be up to BenLand100, not to me or anybody else. But he will have it fixed soon.. hopefully.
TravisV10
2008-10-24 20:31:59
From: Iron man
But were not telling juniors that we have a fix, we are saying that they have to re-create SMART themselves if they want it, or at least that's how I see it.
This far, BenLand100 has not voted, so the person who worked to make it has not quite said that he wants something in return, other thanks and a job well done (he might though). It was HIS choice to release publicly, and I believe there was a greater reason behind it other than "he just felt like it". So you do not know if "the person who had to work for/bake" the cookie wants something in return, other than the a smile on the child's face, since it necessarily wasn't the careful mother who baked them.
The child will eventually find out that the math problem is actually quite simple when he goes to attempt it, then will not redo the math problem to make it safer & faster ;)
EDIT: But again, this is and should be up to BenLand100, not to me or anybody else. But he will have it fixed soon.. hopefully.
Its not telling juniors to recreate smart! Its saying that if you want the fix soon, you have to be a member. Its just one of those things that you get when you actually contribute to this community!
If you want something in life, you work for it!
None of this matters. Ben doesn't care about any of this. He will fix it and give it to us. It'll be free no matter what.
Mjordan
2008-10-24 20:44:15
Wow what a pointless discussion. All you have to do is keep it minimized. Not too much of a trick lol.
And do you guys not have a brain at all, do you really think that the junior members don't already know. By now someone has already 'leaked' the "secret" in your guys terms. I've been here a LONG time, and one thing I know is that if we SRL members know/have something that we want kept to ourselves, then no matter what most of the junior members will know/have it also within a day or two. KYAB was a prime example.
The Claw
2008-10-24 20:58:01
Why the hell wouldnt we give it to junior members? Threads like this are so annoying and arrogant. It not the SRL Members decision anyway. How would you guys like it if we (ssrl +) decided not to release anything to you, because it wouldnt give us incentive or motivation if we did?
Imagine:
Wizzup: "Hey guys wanna release the new SRL?"
Devs: "No way lol, the SRL Members can make their own one, otherwise whats the point in being dev lol"
TravisV10
2008-10-24 21:05:27
From: The Claw
Why the hell wouldnt we give it to junior members? Threads like this are so annoying and arrogant. It not the SRL Members decision anyway. How would you guys like it if we (ssrl +) decided not to release anything to you, because it wouldnt give us incentive or motivation if we did?
Imagine:
Wizzup: "Hey guys wanna release the new SRL?"
Devs: "No way lol, the SRL Members can make their own one, otherwise whats the point in being dev lol"
Thats not the same! Saying someone has to contribute to get something makes sense. You are saying that they must make their own. We would give it to them but they just have to give the community something in return. Its an exchange.
All I'm saying is that there has to be an incentive for people to become SRL Members! Without them working towards something, the community would die. SRL thrives on leechers scripting to get better scripts and a high ranking. Without people working for something, all scripts would be private and there would not be an SRL.
Anyway doesnt matter like stated above.
Narcle
2008-10-24 21:32:37
Why are you guys trying to make everything exclusive? The system works, and it has since SRL started up. Its not going to be changed by discussions. Some major change to RS or something unforeseen would have to happen, I don't see this happening for couple years at least (if at all).
Edit:
Oh, and don't replay with this: But they need to script yada yada, becoming a SRL Member is hard or w/e. You think I don't know? I've risen through the ranks, I know how hard it is, I know how much time it requires to learn to script, I Know. Leechers are a vital part of the community and always will be, don't shun them out after they were already given SMART etc.
SubiN
2008-10-24 22:04:13
From: ~~Joker~~
eh or specific members get smart and idk a test in order to get..
(a another app for SMART) ;P
lol idk but some members would leak it, like previous.
Should set a Login System for SMART. So when running it checks ur script signature id . ( we make a a massive id database for SRL members ) . So if ur password and id is correct it loads smart.
Edit . People should earn the right to use SMART. So many people leech scripts with out even saying Thanx.
TravisV10
2008-10-24 22:05:16
From: Narcle
Why are you guys trying to make everything exclusive? The system works, and it has since SRL started up. Its not going to be changed by discussions. Some major change to RS or something unforeseen would have to happen, I don't see this happening for couple years at least (if at all).
Edit:
Oh, and don't replay with this: But they need to script yada yada, becoming a SRL Member is hard or w/e. You think I don't know? I've risen through the ranks, I know how hard it is, I know how much time it requires to learn to script, I Know. Leechers are a vital part of the community and always will be, don't shun them out after they were already given SMART etc.
The bolded text is what I
just said.
Narcle
2008-10-24 22:10:18
From: TravisV10
The bolded text is what I just said.
Yes, and I was saying in general. This is the second time I've mentioned it on two different threads.
The Claw
2008-10-24 22:45:32
From: TravisV10
Thats not the same! Saying someone has to contribute to get something makes sense. You are saying that they must make their own. We would give it to them but they just have to give the community something in return. Its an exchange.
All I'm saying is that there has to be an incentive for people to become SRL Members! Without them working towards something, the community would die. SRL thrives on leechers scripting to get better scripts and a high ranking. Without people working for something, all scripts would be private and there would not be an SRL.
Anyway doesnt matter like stated above.
There's more than enough incentive already. And if youre getting into SRL members to get smart, youre doing it for the wrong reasons. Anyway, I think the staff's stance is clear on this matter - we chose to release it to everyone, didnt we? Besides, you're already an SRL Member. Why do you want incentive to become one when you already are one? Its bs, you just want to feel and act superior. Its pretty obvious.
But anyway by your reasoning, what has you or any other srl member for that matter done to deserve smart, or even srl? To us, unless you're contributing to srl or smart directly, you're just leechers. Just like SRL Junior members are leechers in your eyes. See what I mean? If we go by your reasoning then no one below ssrl should get anything. Which is not the way it should be.
SRL Member = more valued than Junior member =/= not a leecher.
Nava2
2008-10-24 23:28:11
I say it should be released. No need to keep it. I was just wondering.. not even sure why now.
[-jesus-]
2008-10-25 00:04:30
From: TravisV10
To be honest, there isn't a good motive to be a SRL Member.
Recognition that you are a competent SCAR/SRL scripter?
Anyways, I'm fine using a VM until a full fix comes out. If the votes actually end up counting, move mine to "None" if it's possible.
Magiic
2008-10-25 04:26:05
yeah i mean really releasing smart doesn't make much of a difference but it does let the people who contribute maybe not by scripting use scar in a more efficient way, what was the point of even posting this because think about it, travis if you hadn't got members and you were told you couldn't have smart how would you feel?, after all that you did it all got taken away, it's pointless.
TheChineseMan
2008-10-25 05:50:05
i would say smart deserves to be with everyone i mean like there are more jr members that auto than members that auto so y not give it to everyone… i know that if i was a jr member and applied for membership with a script that i made from normal rs window and then got into members, i would hate seeing that the members already knew the secret to making smart work
so yea everyone…
TravisV10
2008-10-25 09:34:55
From: The Claw
There's more than enough incentive already. And if youre getting into SRL members to get smart, youre doing it for the wrong reasons. Anyway, I think the staff's stance is clear on this matter - we chose to release it to everyone, didnt we? Besides, you're already an SRL Member. Why do you want incentive to become one when you already are one? Its bs, you just want to feel and act superior. Its pretty obvious.
But anyway by your reasoning, what has you or any other srl member for that matter done to deserve smart, or even srl? To us, unless you're contributing to srl or smart directly, you're just leechers. Just like SRL Junior members are leechers in your eyes. See what I mean? If we go by your reasoning then no one below ssrl should get anything. Which is not the way it should be.
SRL Member = more valued than Junior member =/= not a leecher.
@what has you or any other srl member for that matter done to deserve smart- scripted! wtf?
@To us, unless you're contributing to srl or smart directly, you're just leechers.- no, jr. members do not contribute to the community enough. SRL Members have scripted and learned and cared for the community. I'm not saying that all Jr. Members do not deserve SMART, but most really dont.
@ If we go by your reasoning then no one below ssrl should get anything. Which is not the way it should be.- I'm not saying not to give them anything! XD I'm saying that to keep the community growing faster, you should have more incentive for members! I dont even bot anymore so it doesnt make a difference to me
Anyway I see what you mean. When I was going for members a year ago I got so pissed about how smug and arrogant everyone here is. This isn't being smug or arrogant. I have no use for smart. I just think the community would benefit with more people working and putting out scripts!
From: sandos1234
yeah i mean really releasing smart doesn't make much of a difference but it does let the people who contribute maybe not by scripting use scar in a more efficient way, what was the point of even posting this because think about it, travis if you hadn't got members and you were told you couldn't have smart how would you feel?, after all that you did it all got taken away, it's pointless.
How would I feel? I would be happy there was something I would get in return for scripting for this community!
Magiic
2008-10-25 10:57:56
dude, you get an avatar, a yellow name, access to more areas in the forum and more respect for being a well known scripter now actually think of all the jr.s who would quit because of this, srl would die, now think of someone other than yourself.
edit:travis would you like it if all the jrs stopped posting proggies on your thread, posting is contributing, so think about what you say.
Nava2
2008-10-25 11:04:04
Posted how to use SMART, screw discriminating.
Check the link in my sig.
TravisV10
2008-10-25 11:49:38
From: sandos1234
dude, you get an avatar, a yellow name, access to more areas in the forum and more respect for being a well known scripter now actually think of all the jr.s who would quit because of this, srl would die, now think of someone other than yourself.
edit:travis would you like it if all the jrs stopped posting proggies on your thread, posting is contributing, so think about what you say.
Wow why are you being such an ass dude? I'm not thinking about myself! I was speaking for the betterment of the community!
And how would I like it if jr members stop posting proggies? They never do. Posting
is contributing but is it enough to earn all of the hard work that BenLand has but into SMART?
IMO, no. ITS JUST MY OPINION! Relax!
Also, a yellow name, avatar, and access to outdated scripts doesn't sound that great to most people! The only reason I wanted to be a member is because you know you can script once you get the rank. Most people don't have the same self motivation as I do.
And like I said, it doesn't matter!I'm allowed to state my opinion. I don't have to prove myself to you. :P
noidea
2008-10-25 12:00:04
This thread is useless flame… The system is fine now…
Nava2
2008-10-25 14:11:03
From: noidea
This thread is useless flame… The system is fine now…
Either way, I posted how to use SMART in my sig. :)
BuRdTuRd
2008-10-25 17:00:42
From: Shuttleu
http://www.villavu.com/forum/showthread.php?t=36898
~shut
EDIT:
works perfectly
now using it on hys fight caver :)
i told you it was because your computer was shitty but you didnt believe me :p
Well this is a wonderful fix, but can you tell me why it won't login my account with Hy's Fight Caver?
A G E N T
2008-10-26 00:35:02
Something just occurred to me - if there's a way to make windows stay "Always on top" in windows (I bet there are programs that do it), couldn't you just set SMART to always on top, then shove it to the side or bottom where it won't go in your way?
Widget
2008-10-26 01:44:15
From: A G E N T 83
Something just occurred to me - if there's a way to make windows stay "Always on top" in windows (I bet there are programs that do it), couldn't you just set SMART to always on top, then shove it to the side or bottom where it won't go in your way?
The problem is that the runescape client will switch canvases and SMART forgets where it should be looking because of it, so then the scripts have nothing to do since they can't see the screen.
I think it should be public. Leechers are honestly somewhat good for this place. I don't recall seeing nearly as many flames in the members section when I was accepted. I think SMART should either be Devs+ or free for everyone (*pokes Wizzup and/or Yakman to make a GPL one*)
Quickmarch
2008-10-26 04:45:08
its ok on vista because you can just hover your mouse over SMART and it will show you how the script is running.
TravisV10
2008-10-26 11:02:33
From: Quickmarch
its ok on vista because you can just hover your mouse over SMART and it will show you how the script is running.
Smart idea!
Shuttleu
2008-10-26 11:22:02
From: Quickmarch
its ok on vista because you can just hover your mouse over SMART and it will show you how the script is running.
i was thinking of doing that but my laptop has gone back to be repaired so im stuck on my shitty desktop which cant handle vista :(
but it handles xp with scar and smart very nicely
~shut
Nava2
2008-10-26 12:48:33
Glad everyone is running well. :)
Mjordan
2008-10-26 12:51:09
From: Quickmarch
its ok on vista because you can just hover your mouse over SMART and it will show you how the script is running.
It only shows the last time you had it pulled up. Like it isn't an updated image everytime you hover your mouse over.
Quickmarch
2008-10-26 16:18:00
it shows it on mine sometimes as a moving image.
TravisV10
2008-10-26 16:23:23
From: Quickmarch
it shows it on mine sometimes as a moving image.
Hes rite it should show it live.
Laur€ns
2008-10-26 18:02:36
Hmmz.. I don't have Vista :( Travis, do you? :o
TravisV10
2008-10-26 18:33:57
From: Laur€ns
Hmmz.. I don't have Vista :( Travis, do you? :o
Yeah. Its okay I guess.. Its cool to look at but w/e
Mjordan
2008-10-26 19:16:58
From: TravisV10
Hes rite it should show it live.
Hmm thats awkward I'm about 99.9% sure that it doesn't on mine. Do you guys know if there's a setting or something I can change?
TravisV10
2008-10-26 19:34:12
From: Mjordan
Hmm thats awkward I'm about 99.9% sure that it doesn't on mine. Do you guys know if there's a setting or something I can change?
Maybe you have an older version of vista?
There are programs that can do this to. Search google for window previews in taskbar or something. Ive downloaded one before. for why I have no idea :D But just finding one u googled for will work
Mjordan
2008-10-26 19:40:25
From: TravisV10
Maybe you have an older version of vista?
There are programs that can do this to. Search google for window previews in taskbar or something. Ive downloaded one before. for why I have no idea :D But just finding one u googled for will work
Hmm alright thanks.
t3hl33tn00b
2008-10-26 21:57:37
Benland told me a few days ago that it works fine if it stays minimized, but i thought he was joking so i never tried it lol
Nava2
2008-10-27 08:11:29
It does work if you keep it minimized.
Bobarkinator
2008-10-27 14:53:56
Good thing is that it's not a mistake by Jagex, it's something that's built into the java api.
Nava2
2008-10-27 20:03:27
TravisV10
2008-10-27 20:31:48
0wn 4 skill
2008-11-05 02:54:20
Hmmmm, I do think smarts avialability should be Jr. Members and above because they have at least contributed a little to the forum. :p
Magiic
2008-11-05 11:25:04
no, they could have spammed there way to 10 posts and srl needs leechers anyway, without them we'd die out, fast. We just don't like too many of them.
The "outsiders" abused SMART so in my opinion it should stay members only, and If it was up to me, it should have "login" thing, that you insert your SRL login infos in and it checks if youre a SRL member.
Imho. Members only.
But yeah, my word is just a fart in Sahara :D