TViYH
2008-10-05 18:50:41
I don't really see a difference in:
WalkToTile(Point(1234,4321), 5, 5);
and
RadialRoadWalk(blahblahblah);
Frankly, which do you think is better?
And yes, I plan to argue =]
Blumblebee
2008-10-05 18:52:34
appearently reflection is too easy for some people, but reflection is 100% accurate, so i prefer it, as i know it will never fail. Radial Road walk is pretty consistent too, is just depends on what your more comfortable scripting in. If you were writing a script to apply for membership with, then use radialroadwalk, as it shows you have an understanding of radialwalking.
-Blumblebee
TViYH
2008-10-05 19:07:14
They both essentially do the same thing.
Walk from one place to one place.
So, how could 1 be better?
noidea
2008-10-05 19:19:11
You need SMART for reflection, this is a disadvantage to some people because there computers can not run it. If you are applying for members, than use RRW.
TViYH
2008-10-05 19:40:19
Well, on my script I used Reflection with RRW backup and or DTM backup and or symbol backup.
Would that be okay?
noidea
2008-10-05 19:41:12
If you are applying for members, I wouldn't. I would use nothing but colour :D
R0b0t1
2008-10-05 20:08:14
When something has the chance to go horribly wrong, it will…
tank phobia
2008-10-05 20:27:41
From: TheVoiceInYourHead
Well, on my script I used Reflection with RRW backup and or DTM backup and or symbol backup.
Would that be okay?
If you back up reflection with some or all of those other methods (especially rrw) then that is acceptable I believe for membership apps.
Blumblebee
2008-10-05 20:46:40
meh i used reflection in my app, but then again, i had a TON of failsafes. It went, Reflection > DDTM > DTM > RRW > Symbol Finding. On almost every walking procedure. I reccomend that you dont use reflection at all, thus making people have no reason to vote no, but im sure if you backed up reflection fully, you could justify using it.