SRL Archive - News and General

New anti-ban / auto-responder?


Brain

2008-10-01 23:18:30

I did some searching around, and didn't find anything like this…I thinks.

Anyway, my idea is to use the quick-chat thing to randomly talk to people. I don't know how well this will work, or if it will, or if it's effective. I would think it might work…right? Shouldn't be too hard to add it to a script…

Any thoughts?

Blumblebee

2008-10-01 23:23:32

meh, i guess its possible, buts its alot easier to type something by what they say inchatln then it would be to find the quickchat thing, then choose the quick chat. I dunno, someone may feel like doing this, but it seems a lil bit like a waste of time to me.

-Blumblebee

Brain

2008-10-01 23:25:23

Yeah, I know…it's kinda pointless, but jagex might be like "Oh hey, this guy uses quick chat, he can't be bot!"

Blumblebee

2008-10-01 23:26:24

er how woud it know if a good autoresponder was being used. And using quicchat woud be kinda like saying hey im botting. I mean how many ppl do you know use quickchat?

tank phobia

2008-10-01 23:33:48

Honestly I don't think it would be beneficial at all, Jagex won't think that because a user is using quick chat they can't be a bot… they are well aware of the capabilities of bots and this is well within those. Nice thought though!

Brain

2008-10-01 23:38:17

I actually go the idea running wizzup's fisher, and there were like 5 people there using quickchat. Other than those 5 people? No-body :p

Dracody

2008-10-01 23:52:36

Ok Brain I wont let you down :p

Well it wouldnt replace the possibility of just using TypeSend('');
It could be like a second option people could use , to look less botty , since Ive also seen many guys that use Quick Chat, they keep on asking…. Whats
your strength lvl and nooby stuff like that, so It could work ,
to randomize a little more the autoresponds, so not just write but also use QuickChat to mix em and look a lot less botty, would work as an antiban also.

It could be added to SRL Autoresoponder Includes to have it as an option or something:)

tank phobia

2008-10-02 00:21:35

I suppose it could be an option, more useful would be an include that searched for certain strings like "str lvl" or "rng lvl"… there's countless variations and then replies with a suitable quickchat answer, although I am guessing this has already been done in some form with normal chatting already?

Brain

2008-10-02 00:45:34

ho ha!
Dracody kinda knows what I'm talking about. Of course you wouldn't have it only auto respond with quickchat, but it is just one of the random options in the auto-responder. So sometimes it quick chats back, some times it just answers them. It seems like Tank it kinda feeling my flow as well.

NiCbaZ

2008-10-02 04:54:52

Err there is quickchat in SRL, in the misc folder i thhinik

sn0man

2008-10-07 06:41:39

nah i think using regular chats less suspicious. but it does make u think. using quick chat would be too easy and if u think about it most people would think most bots use quick chat instead of actual typing. but its still a good idea.