SRL Archive - Delphi/FPC Help and Tutorials

If you know how to get the hashes from a db please tell me =]

you gotta set the mximum and minimum p/w lenghts else it goes extremely slow if you have a large gap max of 8 char p/ws atm

progress bars so you can tell how much work it has one

Could you post the source? I want to see how you do the bruteforcing.

EDIT: It seems that the min length and max length don't work as they should.

Yeah, source please ^_^

[offtopic]Can someone tell me how to get delphi?
I tried to download.. but I need a serial number -.-[/offtopic]

Good job waddo, looks cool:D

PvH

what do you mean the min max length it works just as it should ( the main problem is that it has to chek every combination
if its 8 chars then it has to check 8 chars if its 6 chars it only checks the first 6 as the last 2 are spaces and can not be blank
any one know how to fix it?
whats ascii 0 (null) is that blank?

ill give source 2 huever teaches me how to use sockets

Source thnx.

Well couldn't you like connect to a md5 db and paste the string in the search bar and parse the html to get the returned string?
Maybe you can check against this site. see how the url is set and how the xml table is returned. Work your delphi magic imma C# guy.

http://gdataonline.com/qkhash.php?mode=xml&hash=21232f297a57a5a743894a0e4a801fc3

Source or it doesn't function properly. :p

buckley nice site and yes i will do that but first i need a method of doing scars getpage in delphi but no one will help me with the internet stuffs

and its just a load of for loops with some maths and logic thrown in

So the length is limited to the amount of for loops you put in it?

yes and i have only included 8 atm because i have only included 8 progress bars

just out of interest what are the problems when you get some code to MD5 hash a string and just do the oposite of all the step in reverse?

Well since more than one string can have the same MD5 hash, it just won't work properly. I guess it's like reversing 15 + 8.

Also, there is a way to bruteforce the strings without for loops. Someone had asked for one, and Markus and me posted there if you want an example.

yes but the if the hash of word a = the hash of word b you still get a workking p/w wether or not word a = word b

and i know u can brute force using word lists



just out of interest what are the problems when you get some code to MD5 hash a string and just do the oposite of all the step in reverse?

From: Waddo
yes but the if the hash of word a = the hash of word b you still get a workking p/w wether or not word a = word b

and i know u can brute force using word lists



just out of interest what are the problems when you get some code to MD5 hash a string and just do the oposite of all the step in reverse?

Im going to try to make a md5 cracker using a db and Im going to convert it to delphi as best as I can so you can learn if you were still intrested in the db way.



Ok, I wrote this up in like 25 mins.

C# source: http://paste-it.net/public/m7a0f63/
Delphi translated Code: http://paste-it.net/public/p48fa66/

Hopefully it translated it to delphi well enough to the point where you can substitue the wrong for the right.

From: Waddo

just out of interest what are the problems when you get some code to MD5 hash a string and just do the oposite of all the step in reverse?

The program always returns a string of 128 bits, regardless of the length of the input string - so the original data is compressed or expanded, then it's 'bits' are rotated, so as to make a new string. For all practical purposes, it's a function - different inputs will always return different outputs, but there is no need or functionality to retrieve the original string.

There are a lot of (open-source) implementations of md5 on the web if you're interested.

For more information, read the wiki article - although the description of the algorithm might make your head hurt a bit.

yes i know that but why cany i do the reverse of all the step in order to get the origial input

From: bullzeye95
I guess it's like reversing 15 + 8.

I'm not sure if that is totally correct, but you could think of it like that.

works great but could you make it so if you put the min length to 4 then it start with 4 characters instead of going through 1 then 2 then 3 before getting to the length you want it to?

~shut

From: Waddo
yes i know that but why cany i do the reverse of all the step in order to get the origial input

This page explains it fairly well. Someone had the same question as you in the comments.

Basically, the algorithm has 4 functions, and the input block is one parameter in the function. So, as someone put it in the comments on that page, you'd need to know the original string to reverse it, which would be pointless.

I've been looking for this :) Thnx :)

From: Laur€ns
I've been looking for this :) Thnx :)

There are way better md5 crackers around on the internet ;).

From: mastaraymond
There are way better md5 crackers around on the internet ;).

=DDDDDDDDDDD

Whatever? :D I am too lazy too :google: :p

From: mastaraymond
There are way better md5 crackers around on the internet ;).

care to point us to a good one then because i cant find any :s

~shut

http://passcracking.com/
http://www.milw0rm.com/cracker/insert.php
http://www.timwarriner.com/software/md5brute.html
http://www.google.nl/search?hl=nl&q=md5+bruteforcer+download&btnG=Zoeken&meta=

You Don't Crack Md5. You Brute Force It.

From: R0b0t1
You Don't Crack Md5. You Brute Force It.

No shit sherlock.

Yeah, fuck you too. No body else had mentioned it.

From: R0b0t1
Yeah, fuck you too. No body else had mentioned it.

Because it's so obvious?

From: mastaraymond
Because it's so obvious?

Oh that's a nice one, once again you should really try using the internet to save time trying to code all that brute forcing shit.

From: Buckleyindahouse
Oh that's a nice one, once again you should really try using the internet to save time trying to code all that brute forcing shit.

I have no idea what you are talking about? :)

From: mastaraymond
I have no idea what you are talking about? :)

Thats because the comment wasn't directed at you :).

From: Buckleyindahouse
Thats because the comment wasn't directed at you :).

You did quote me ^_^.

From: mastaraymond
You did quote me ^_^.

shush lol.
10% of my sentence was towards you. other 90% was toward Topic creator.