SRL Archive - Discussions and Debates

SRL not backwards compatable?


The Un-Named

2006-03-17 21:14:39

SRL 317 differ's from 222, is it because the code probally was more detectable?

BenLand100

2006-03-17 21:24:40

I don't quite get your question. SRL will change between releases but you must understand the first release (317) was beta 1 and 222 is beta 2. That means that we are still deciding how we want it to be. After it gets out of betas then it will be 100% backwards compatible, even though it is very close to 100% backwards compatible now.

The Un-Named

2006-03-17 21:26:46

You mixed that up. The first beta was 222, second was 317. I was just wondering if they removed some procedures because they could be more detectable. I used MMouse2, and got the new update and it was gone.

masquerader

2006-03-17 21:34:44

From: The Un-Named
You mixed that up. The first beta was 222, second was 317. I was just wondering if they removed some procedures because they could be more detectable. I used MMouse2, and got the new update and it was gone.


backwards capability is there. in that case the two mouse procedures were integrated to use the benmouse variable instead. i cant think of any procedures that were completely removed, except the old box ones

The Un-Named

2006-03-17 22:02:34

How do you make it so it's like MMouse2?(See below)

Using 222, this is MMouse2: http://img106.imageshack.us/img106/7846/1custom3bs.jpg
Using 222, this is MMouse: http://img106.imageshack.us/img106/7580/2custom2qv.jpg
Using 317, this is MMouse: http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/5797/3custom5px.jpg

Sorry about quality and size. Imageshack won't take too large file sizes.

masquerader

2006-03-17 22:09:08

benmouse:=true
its a global you switch on and off whenever

The Un-Named

2006-03-17 22:12:57

Ok thank you. :)