SRL Members.
pwnaz0r
2007-11-20 23:19:44
With the recent leakage of SMART, obviously some members cannot be trusted. We can narrow it down to no SSRL, since it was not leaked before it was released to members (or can we ?). Anyways, I think Dark_Sniper has come up with a sensable solution. Somehow make all the members re-apply. It would not be an easy job, but a necessary one? Maybe there is some alternative?
Dark_Sniper
2007-11-20 23:26:56
IMO I think we should make them all reapply… people who want to be an SRL member will easily be able to dig up a script and apply with it (one they made themselves).
Everyone who i see complaining would not deserve to be a SRL member any way… I mean it would not be that hard to reapply… and maybe it will stricken their thinking on who gets into SRL.
I can see the few downsides to this…. I still think its worth a shot.
Hobbit
2007-11-20 23:31:30
But what about us, If we're not forced to reapply wont they kinda figure it out about SSRL? Or are we to stage our reapplications also?
Dark_Sniper
2007-11-21 00:18:59
we can also reapply no problem with me…
or say anyone with a script released to public… gets to remain SRL to help accept the members who deserve it back.
The Claw
2007-11-21 00:31:25
yeap i agree
Dark_Sniper
2007-11-21 00:35:09
quick question…
"Registered SRL User Member" WTF is my title that for?
Cheesehunk
2007-11-21 00:36:43
I hope Developers don't have too re-apply as well. I may not pass..:p
Dark_Sniper
2007-11-21 00:41:51
ya devs shouldn't have to :p
everyone with scripts released should not have to… unless that person is suspeses….
I do think this should be put into action.
look at this :

some one explain pl0x?
SKy Scripter
2007-11-21 01:01:45
Actually i agree too.. they should all re-apply
pwnaz0r
2007-11-21 01:20:05
lol darky, I don't think anyone is going to explain :D
Dark_Sniper
2007-11-21 02:03:03
I bet pwnaz0r… if anyone wants to change it back change it to The Dark Snipers group :p
// back to subject
I think most people would agree to this…
I mean complaining will only show that the person got in of srl members out of pure luck….
I mean everything i just stated above :).
The Un-Named
2007-11-21 07:11:55
Yes, I reckon every SRL member should re-apply, but, I think they should get their own little title, and they should only see the public forums and a new applying forum, and if they don't reply within x weeks, they go public again.
mastaraymond
2007-11-21 09:31:18
But, probably a lot of people who won't get in, will be mad and leak SMART..
Ruroken
2007-11-21 10:05:18
ah jeez…this is quite a pickle we got ourselves into here…
I don't believe any SSRL leaked SMART. And the member leaker/s was/were only one case and I'm not sure he/she/they should ruin the members for everyone else…
But punishment is necessary.
Wizzup?
2007-11-21 10:17:55
Laughing out loud.
So, we let new members apply?
What do good scripting skills prove? That you can be trusted?
Think about it, you can be the best scripter in world but that does not make you a trusted person.
SKy Scripter
2007-11-21 10:55:20
I only agreed to it because some memebers just suck at scripting XD.
Besides the funniest part, is it's too easy to predict it was going to be leaked in the first place…. and some of you guys act like you didnt know it would be.
but whatever lol…
It wasn't leaked out of the SSRL forum as far as I know, that's an accomplishment.
I don't think making everyone reapply is a good idea.
Boreas
2007-11-21 11:37:43
From: Wizzup?
Laughing out loud.
So, we let new members apply?
What do good scripting skills prove? That you can be trusted?
Think about it, you can be the best scripter in world but that does not make you a trusted person.
I agree.
Just don't release anything you don't want leaked to SRL. That's part of the reason for SSRL.
BTW you guys did a good job on the SMART release thread acting surprised.
Smartzkid
2007-11-21 14:17:07
Randomly demote members, a couple a day?
Would save us from being noticed, and it'd save us from having to go through like 500 applications in a week, but there's one problem I see…
'lesser' members would just let 'lesser' members back in again.
Two other ideas:
1: Claim to be experimenting with a 'temporary' mod status, make us all 'temp' mods, then do the demotion, then, a week or two later, say that the 'temp' modership just didn't pay off, and make us all members again
2: Mod us all :p
Dark_Sniper
2007-11-21 16:15:50
Ya I knew it was going to be leaked the instant it was released.
but getting out all the inactive people and people who vote yes to every app would be nice as well. going through 500 apps in one day would suck though. I do think that we should have dememberized some more people… more than the 150 guys you already got :p.
wizzy… you know your laughing at how the ranks are setup :p
Why do you trust the devs over us… why do you trust us over SRL members…
All I can say now is that i'm happy you got rid of at least 150 members.
So I guess we can thank you for that much.
The Un-Named
2007-11-21 17:55:12
From: Wizzup?
What do good scripting skills prove? That you can be trusted?
Think about it, you can be the best scripter in world but that does not make you a trusted person.
If every SRL Member was demoted and needed to re-apply, you would be left with SRL Members that A) Can either script or pull out an old script and fix it up so it looks like they made it at short notice, B) Left with only active people and C) obviously care enough about the community to want to re-apply. You won't have any people that got free SRL Members, or "accounts" that don't post that still have access to the forums.
Cheesehunk
2007-11-21 18:21:27
I say any SRL Member without a cup who hasn't been memberized within the past 3 months should have to re-apply. Nothing to do with leakers, just to rid of the leachers.