SRL Archive - Senior News and General

Smart without FrameRateBar


Wizzup?

2007-11-17 12:41:27

WT-Fakawi and I are sort of ready to release it.
We just need a Smart without FrameRate bar, and without SmartSetFPS/SmartGetFPS. Incase someone would find out about those.

mastaraymond

2007-11-17 12:49:30

From: Wizzup?
WT-Fakawi and I are sort of ready to release it.
We just need a Smart without FrameRate bar, and without SmartSetFPS/SmartGetFPS. Incase someone would find out about those.

Only one who can do this is Benland :(

Wizzup?

2007-11-17 12:54:41

That is why I posted it. ;)

mastaraymond

2007-11-17 12:56:11

From: Wizzup?
That is why I posted it. ;)

Ah, never mind i misread the first post x).

Smartzkid

2007-11-17 15:09:51

Been trying to get the SMART source from Ben, but it's hopeless :p

I guess we'll just have to wait for him.

Wizzup?

2007-11-17 15:51:10

From: Smartzkid
Been trying to get the SMART source from Ben, but it's hopeless :p

I guess we'll just have to wait for him.


Well, I am happy he keeps it closed source.
I know alot of people who would love to get their hands on the source.

Hobbit

2007-11-17 20:28:45

From: Wizzup?
Well, I am happy he keeps it closed source.
I know alot of people who would love to get their hands on the source.


Most of which is Solar:rolleyes:

BenLand100

2007-11-17 22:28:55

If you posted in the SMART section I might have seen it earlier :) I'll take that out; you want it locked at 60% right?

Edit: Attached w/ mods & locked at 60%

pwnaz0r

2007-11-17 23:11:42

Good stuff. So it will be released to the public now? If so, how and when so we can know to get ready. Also, alot of people know I am SSRL, due to my name being in the tutorial you gave them. I simply told them that I wrote the tutorial and tryed to hint that it didn't mean I was SSRL :D.

Hobbit

2007-11-18 02:08:43

So should the SSRL people keep the plugin we have or is there any major updates to this version other than the locked FPS?

Markus

2007-11-18 03:10:34

Muh I just stick with the old one. It's working fine and even if Ben updated some 1337 stuff inside, he can die as I want the fps bar :f:

Wizzup?

2007-11-18 04:42:13

From: BenLand100
If you posted in the SMART section I might have seen it earlier :) I'll take that out; you want it locked at 60% right?

Edit: Attached w/ mods & locked at 60%


Thanks;
Yes, 60% is just fine. NoSmartSetRefresh, excellent. TY.

EDIT: Indeed, no frameratebar. Excellent! You are the man.

Failed when compiling
Line 1624: [Error] (18001:1): Unknown identifier 'SmartSetFresh' in script *\VEM 0.61.scar


Yay. ;)

The Un-Named

2007-11-18 11:23:18

If anyone has backups(I still gotta check mine, in other words, lazy :D), the previous versions before Embedded Smart were released with source. (I'm sure it needs updating because the way the worldlist on RS.com has changed).

Wizzup?

2007-11-18 12:53:32

From: The Un-Named
If anyone has backups(I still gotta check mine, in other words, lazy :D), the previous versions before Embedded Smart were released with source. (I'm sure it needs updating because the way the worldlist on RS.com has changed).


Source's have been removed from the forums, though.
There is no source of the .dll, only from the previous versions. But the dll differers alot from the normal one.

The Un-Named

2007-11-18 13:26:32

From: Wizzup?
Source's have been removed from the forums, though.
There is no source of the .dll, only from the previous versions. But the dll differers alot from the normal one.


I know the source isn't released with the recent versions(I said that in my previous post :P), and I know it's been removed but then I also said people should check their backups.

But anyway, I have found SMART 3.0's source if anyone wants it.

BenLand100

2007-11-18 21:03:31

From: The Un-Named
But anyway, I have found SMART 3.0's source if anyone wants it.

Was that the version with the crazy memory mapping across the two processes? :p Anyway, like wizzup said, the versions I released with source are almost nothing like the current version ;)

Also, the only differences between the version you have been using (with FPS bar) and the newest one (no FPS bar) are one line, and two numbers:
Changed 24 to 22 here:
DelphiExport long __stdcall GetFunctionCount() {
return 22;
}
Commented out this line:
//clientFrame.add(refreshSlider,BorderLayout.EAST);
And changed 96 to 60 here:
setRefresh(60);
:garfield: And people say I don't release source… :D

RAM

2007-11-18 21:11:31

Ok, so, I'm kind of confused (nothing new I know), I had messed about with the slider bar, and really noticed no differences….. but anyways….the idea by removing it from the released version, was to limit the potential of abuse, by trying to limit the amount of instances of SCAR/SMART that could be run….. if that is the case, shouldn't it have been locked at 100% and not 60%….???

Cheesehunk

2007-11-18 21:24:22

You can still run SMART with about 20-40%. This will at least limit the amount of SMART's too around 3-4.

BenLand100

2007-11-18 21:33:53

From: Cheesehunk
You can still run SMART with about 20-40%. This will at least limit the amount of SMART's too around 3-4.

Verses 5-12 with the slider ;) BTW Ram, you have to have it blocked in order to see the effect the slider is having.

The Un-Named

2007-11-19 03:59:00

From: BenLand100
Was that the version with the crazy memory mapping across the two processes? :p Anyway, like wizzup said, the versions I released with source are almost nothing like the current version ;)


I'm sure it's a very buggy version, it still has the debug jar of the client. Anyway I know the versions are very different but it *might* help people interested in seeing how SMART works.