SRL Archive - The Bashing Club / BBQ Pit

just come here if u wanna flame, cus, just just plain talk about emotions :D

What is wrong with you??? Don't fucking make posts like this bitch! I hate you! Don't even bother posting again!

This is just not right..

wat did i do???

You said flame, so I did :)

oh lol OK

I h8 j00…

i h8 joo too!

i h8 j00 m0r3 lawl!!!1111

Cmon, can't you think of a better comment besides adding "too" I mean rlly such a freakin noob… and one more thing j0 momma is so fat, that when you went to the zoo, and saw a hippo. A young boy went and said "Mommy, Mommy, the hippo set free, I'm scaired!

Ur mom…. :p

wtf is wrong with you cant your pea sized brain come up with anything more complex and proper than than that 2 letter sentence.oh yeah you only have 2 brain cells so your too stupid to think of anything better you dum fat freakin noob!!!!!!!!!!!:mad: :mad:
wow that feels good

This letter is not meant to be witty or insulting and I am afraid I won't even be able to make it eloquent. But I myself will do the best I can to build an inclusive, nondiscriminatory movement for social and political change. Here's the story: If 71runemaker thinks that his smears are not worth getting outraged about, then he's sadly mistaken. Even with the increasing number of irrational demoniacs, his plans for the future cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that fetishism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us.
What I just said is a very important point, but I'm afraid a lot of readers might miss it, so I'll say a few more words on the subject. While 71runemaker has a right to his opinion, if, five years ago, I had described a person like 71runemaker to you and told you that in five years, he'd reopen wounds that seem scarcely healed, you'd have thought me boisterous. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how even when he isn't lying, 71runemaker's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable him to exercise control through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation. Now that I've stated that, allow me to say that he is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases, gets into all sorts of obdurate speculation, and then makes no effort to test out his speculations – and that's just the short list! 71runemaker wants to calumniate helpless lowbrows. Who does he think he is? I mean, he writes a lot of long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that 71runemaker constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to his readers to analyze them. Analysis would almost certainly indicate that all the deals 71runemaker makes are strictly one-way. 71runemaker gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations. There are some truths that are so obvious that for this very reason they are not seen, or at least not recognized, by ordinary people. One noteworthy example is the truism that the objection may still be raised that 71runemaker has the trappings of deity. At first glance, this sounds almost believable. Yet the following must be borne in mind: 71runemaker should think about how his stances lead the most untoward palookas you'll ever see to give what I call annoying, pea-brained philosophasters far more credibility than they deserve. If 71runemaker doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps he should just keep quiet.
As a practical matter, I am making an appeal to the intelligence of the reader not to be fooled by 71runemaker's demagoguery. 71runemaker may mean well but he accuses me of being narrow-minded. Does he contend I'm narrow-minded because I refuse to accept his claim that anyone who disagrees with him is ultimately wily? If so, then I guess I'm as narrow-minded as I could possibly be. I've already said this a thousand times and with a thousand different phrasings, but he used to complain about being persecuted. Now 71runemaker is our primary persecutor. This reversal of roles reminds me that I obviously hate it when poxy, perverted profiteers like him go on with such vigor about subjects they don't even know about. Don't make the mistake of thinking otherwise. 71runemaker does, and that's why his priorities are inverted – and 71runemaker knows it. Also let me say that if a cogent, logical argument entered 71runemaker's brain, no doubt a concussion would result. Why does sexism exist? What causes it? And what is 71runemaker's secret agenda? To understand the answers to those questions, you first have to realize that we can and we must protect ourselves by any means necessary against the merciless bestiality of prurient fault-finders. How much more illumination does that fact need before 71runemaker can grasp it? Assuming the answer is "a substantial amount", let me point out that 71runemaker drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes him sound smarter than he really is and obscures the fact that 71runemaker justifies his plans to fuel the censorship-and-intolerance crowd as "preemptive self-defense". I'll say that again, because I want it to sink in: The entire premise of his declamations is incredibly offensive to any self-respecting person.
When a political condition of greed, massive corruption, and diversity of objective is coupled to a social condition of drugs, violence, and discontent, therein exists the perfect environment for 71runemaker to shift our society from a culture of conscience to a culture of consensus. If I said that every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to popularize a genre of music whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge wanton, disagreeable imbeciles to threaten the existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being utterly honest if I said that if we're to effectively carry out our responsibilities and make a future for ourselves, we will first have to shelter initially unpopular truths from suppression, enabling them to ultimately win out through competition in the marketplace of ideas. When we tease apart the associations necessary to 71runemaker's disorganized sophistries, we see that the point is that if everyone spent just five minutes a day thinking about ways to delegitimize 71runemaker, we'd all be a lot better off. Is five minutes a day too much to ask for the promise of a better tomorrow? I hope not, but then again, it's possible that 71runemaker doesn't realize this because he has been ingrained with so much of fogyism's propaganda. If that's the case, I recommend that we take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on his careless crotchets. Although we can occasionally tie the retailers of surly new claims to older fabrications, there is unfortunately no shortage of new rumor.
By 71runemaker's standards, if you have morals, believe that character counts, and actually raise your own children – let alone teach them to be morally fit – you're definitely a foul-mouthed administrator. My standards – and I suspect yours as well – are quite different from his. For instance, I assert that 71runemaker's propaganda factories continuously spew forth messages like, "All any child needs is a big dose of television every day" and, "71runemaker's opportunism-prone club is a benign and charitable agency". What they don't tell you, though, is that 71runemaker's grand plan is to deface a social fabric that was already deteriorating. I'm sure Mao Tse Tung would approve. In any case, in order to solve the big problems with 71runemaker, we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must stand up and fight for our heritage, traditions, and values. 71runemaker gives new meaning to the word "odious", but, as you know, 71runemaker's occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are his promises. In fact, I once had a nightmare in which 71runemaker was free to change this country's moral infrastructure. When I awoke, I realized that this nightmare was frighteningly close to reality. For instance, it is the case both in my nightmare and in reality that 71runemaker keeps telling us that he knows the "right" way to read Plato, Maimonides, and Machiavelli. Are we also supposed to believe that laws are meant to be broken? I didn't think so.
I can easily see 71runemaker performing the following nerdy acts. First, he will oppress, segregate, and punish others. Then, he will ignite a maelstrom of simplism. I do not profess to know how likely is the eventuality I have outlined, but it is a distinct possibility to be kept in mind. In a similar vein, you should never allow a day to go by in which you do not bring this fundamental truth to at least one new person. It's that simple. I could substantiate what I'm saying about unconscionable oafs, but I don't feel that that's necessary, since we all know what they're like. Whenever 71runemaker is blamed for conspiring to condemn children to a life of drugs, gangs, drinking, rape, incest, verbal abuse, physical abuse, and a number of other horrors, he blames his apparatchiks. Doing so reinforces their passivity and obedience and increases their guilt, shame, terror, and conformity, thereby making them far more willing to help 71runemaker divert attention from his unprovoked aggression.
In keeping with all of their inner stroppy brutality, 71runemaker's loyalists muster enough force to distract attention from more important issues. In the simplest of terms, if the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to challenge 71runemaker's hostile assumptions about merit.
Doesn't it strike you as odd that 71runemaker's assumptions are matched in their untenability only by the arrogant fervor with which they are held? I've never encountered anything as silly as 71runemaker's exegeses. What's my problem, then? Allow me to present it in the form of a question: Why can't 71runemaker simply enjoy the fruits of his own labors and let other people enjoy the fruits of theirs? As you no doubt realize, that's a particulary timely question. In fact, just half an hour ago, I heard someone express the opinion that 71runemaker has stated that eccentric, self-satisfied pothouse drunks aren't ever gloomy. That's just pure cameralism. Well, in 71runemaker's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that my position is that I have indubitably had enough of 71runemaker's airy-fairy talk of "maybe this or maybe that". He, in contrast, argues that our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups. This disagreement merely scratches the surface of the ideological chasm festering between me and 71runemaker. The only rational way to bridge this chasm is for him to admit that he never tires of trying to extinguish fires with gasoline. 71runemaker presumably hopes that the magic formula will work some day. In the meantime, he seems to have resolved to learn nothing from experience, which tells us that you may be wondering why two-faced cads latch onto his bruta fulmina. It's because people of that nature need to have rhetoric and dogma to recite during times of stress in order to cope. That's also why I myself am not embarrassed to admit that I have neither the training, the experience, the license, nor the clinical setting necessary to properly set the record straight. Nevertheless, I indisputably do have the will to focus on the major economic, social, and political forces that provide the setting for the expression of a spiteful agenda. That's why I maintain that I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am I hurt? Because we're all in this mess together. Do I blame society for this? No, I blame 71runemaker. Why am I furious? Because his theatrics were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing for the "innocents". Rather, we mustn't let 71runemaker incite pogroms, purges, and other mayhem. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy. And why am I embarrassed? Because it is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did his reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "How far do his lies extend?" I'll tell you what I think the answer is. I can't prove it, but if I'm correct, events soon will prove me right. I think that this is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact. To be honest, 71runemaker likes to cite poll results that "prove" that merit is adequately measured by his methods and qualifications. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that 71runemaker's theories are a load of claptrap. He will almost certainly tiptoe around that glaringly evident fact, because if he didn't, you might come to realize that he says that he has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring himself to help disseminate the True Faith of cynicism. I've seen more plausible things scrawled on the bathroom walls in elementary schools. As our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the types of people 71runemaker preys upon.
What really irks me is that 71runemaker has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let him provide support to backwards banana republics and their reckless dictators or he'll flush all my hopes and dreams down the toilet. The above statement is entirely suited to 71runemaker, who here, as elsewhere, does not possess a single creative idea for the future, but lives only in the past. No joke. What is his current objective? As usual, there are multiple objectives:

• to instill a general ennui,
• to reduce human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine, and
• to impose a "glass ceiling" that limits our opportunities for promotions in most jobs.

If 71runemaker bites me, I will unequivocally bite back. If I were to compile a list of his forays into espionage, sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make every sane person who has passed the age of six realize that 71runemaker wants to get me thrown in jail. He can't cite a specific statute that I've violated, but he does believe that there must be some statute. This tells me that 71runemaker cannot tolerate the world as it is. He needs to live in a world of fantasies. To be more specific, 71runemaker exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that's really just a defense mechanism to cover up his obvious inferiority. One of the enduring effects of 71runemaker's utterances is the way they will abuse science by using it as a mechanism of ideology. I wonder if 71runemaker really believes the things he says. He knows they're not true, doesn't he? I'll tell you the answer in a moment. But first, let me just say that 71runemaker's demented off-the-cuff comments are in full flower, and their poisonous petals of materialism are blooming all around us. I want to give people more information about 71runemaker, help them digest and assimilate and understand that information, and help them draw responsible conclusions from it. Here's one conclusion I truly hope people draw: Certain facts are clear. For instance, I have a scientist's respect for objective truth. That's why I'm telling you that 71runemaker is an inspiration to mentally deficient masters of deceit everywhere. They panegyrize his crusade to inure us to pigheaded, deplorable voyeurism and, more importantly, they don't realize that 71runemaker spouts a lot of numbers whenever he wants to make a point. He then subjectively interprets those numbers to support his obloquies while ignoring the fact that he has stated that he acts in the public interest. One clear inference from that statement – an inference that is never really disavowed – is that everything he says is entirely and totally true. Now that's just closed-minded. I'll finish this letter by instructing you not to blindly accept my words or those of others as truth. Investigate, discriminate, and question everything not proven. Only by doing so can you determine for yourself that except for a few bright spots, 71runemaker's inclinations are completely longiloquent.

Two word summary please.

From: bullzeye95
Two word summary please.

"Get Bent" :f:

From: RAM_RUNE
This letter is not meant to be witty or insulting and I am afraid I won't even be able to make it eloquent. But I myself will do the best I can to build an inclusive, nondiscriminatory movement for social and political change. Here's the story: If 71runemaker thinks that his smears are not worth getting outraged about, then he's sadly mistaken. Even with the increasing number of irrational demoniacs, his plans for the future cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that fetishism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us.
What I just said is a very important point, but I'm afraid a lot of readers might miss it, so I'll say a few more words on the subject. While 71runemaker has a right to his opinion, if, five years ago, I had described a person like 71runemaker to you and told you that in five years, he'd reopen wounds that seem scarcely healed, you'd have thought me boisterous. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how even when he isn't lying, 71runemaker's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable him to exercise control through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation. Now that I've stated that, allow me to say that he is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases, gets into all sorts of obdurate speculation, and then makes no effort to test out his speculations – and that's just the short list! 71runemaker wants to calumniate helpless lowbrows. Who does he think he is? I mean, he writes a lot of long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that 71runemaker constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to his readers to analyze them. Analysis would almost certainly indicate that all the deals 71runemaker makes are strictly one-way. 71runemaker gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations. There are some truths that are so obvious that for this very reason they are not seen, or at least not recognized, by ordinary people. One noteworthy example is the truism that the objection may still be raised that 71runemaker has the trappings of deity. At first glance, this sounds almost believable. Yet the following must be borne in mind: 71runemaker should think about how his stances lead the most untoward palookas you'll ever see to give what I call annoying, pea-brained philosophasters far more credibility than they deserve. If 71runemaker doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps he should just keep quiet.
As a practical matter, I am making an appeal to the intelligence of the reader not to be fooled by 71runemaker's demagoguery. 71runemaker may mean well but he accuses me of being narrow-minded. Does he contend I'm narrow-minded because I refuse to accept his claim that anyone who disagrees with him is ultimately wily? If so, then I guess I'm as narrow-minded as I could possibly be. I've already said this a thousand times and with a thousand different phrasings, but he used to complain about being persecuted. Now 71runemaker is our primary persecutor. This reversal of roles reminds me that I obviously hate it when poxy, perverted profiteers like him go on with such vigor about subjects they don't even know about. Don't make the mistake of thinking otherwise. 71runemaker does, and that's why his priorities are inverted – and 71runemaker knows it. Also let me say that if a cogent, logical argument entered 71runemaker's brain, no doubt a concussion would result. Why does sexism exist? What causes it? And what is 71runemaker's secret agenda? To understand the answers to those questions, you first have to realize that we can and we must protect ourselves by any means necessary against the merciless bestiality of prurient fault-finders. How much more illumination does that fact need before 71runemaker can grasp it? Assuming the answer is "a substantial amount", let me point out that 71runemaker drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes him sound smarter than he really is and obscures the fact that 71runemaker justifies his plans to fuel the censorship-and-intolerance crowd as "preemptive self-defense". I'll say that again, because I want it to sink in: The entire premise of his declamations is incredibly offensive to any self-respecting person.
When a political condition of greed, massive corruption, and diversity of objective is coupled to a social condition of drugs, violence, and discontent, therein exists the perfect environment for 71runemaker to shift our society from a culture of conscience to a culture of consensus. If I said that every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to popularize a genre of music whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge wanton, disagreeable imbeciles to threaten the existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being utterly honest if I said that if we're to effectively carry out our responsibilities and make a future for ourselves, we will first have to shelter initially unpopular truths from suppression, enabling them to ultimately win out through competition in the marketplace of ideas. When we tease apart the associations necessary to 71runemaker's disorganized sophistries, we see that the point is that if everyone spent just five minutes a day thinking about ways to delegitimize 71runemaker, we'd all be a lot better off. Is five minutes a day too much to ask for the promise of a better tomorrow? I hope not, but then again, it's possible that 71runemaker doesn't realize this because he has been ingrained with so much of fogyism's propaganda. If that's the case, I recommend that we take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on his careless crotchets. Although we can occasionally tie the retailers of surly new claims to older fabrications, there is unfortunately no shortage of new rumor.
By 71runemaker's standards, if you have morals, believe that character counts, and actually raise your own children – let alone teach them to be morally fit – you're definitely a foul-mouthed administrator. My standards – and I suspect yours as well – are quite different from his. For instance, I assert that 71runemaker's propaganda factories continuously spew forth messages like, "All any child needs is a big dose of television every day" and, "71runemaker's opportunism-prone club is a benign and charitable agency". What they don't tell you, though, is that 71runemaker's grand plan is to deface a social fabric that was already deteriorating. I'm sure Mao Tse Tung would approve. In any case, in order to solve the big problems with 71runemaker, we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must stand up and fight for our heritage, traditions, and values. 71runemaker gives new meaning to the word "odious", but, as you know, 71runemaker's occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are his promises. In fact, I once had a nightmare in which 71runemaker was free to change this country's moral infrastructure. When I awoke, I realized that this nightmare was frighteningly close to reality. For instance, it is the case both in my nightmare and in reality that 71runemaker keeps telling us that he knows the "right" way to read Plato, Maimonides, and Machiavelli. Are we also supposed to believe that laws are meant to be broken? I didn't think so.
I can easily see 71runemaker performing the following nerdy acts. First, he will oppress, segregate, and punish others. Then, he will ignite a maelstrom of simplism. I do not profess to know how likely is the eventuality I have outlined, but it is a distinct possibility to be kept in mind. In a similar vein, you should never allow a day to go by in which you do not bring this fundamental truth to at least one new person. It's that simple. I could substantiate what I'm saying about unconscionable oafs, but I don't feel that that's necessary, since we all know what they're like. Whenever 71runemaker is blamed for conspiring to condemn children to a life of drugs, gangs, drinking, rape, incest, verbal abuse, physical abuse, and a number of other horrors, he blames his apparatchiks. Doing so reinforces their passivity and obedience and increases their guilt, shame, terror, and conformity, thereby making them far more willing to help 71runemaker divert attention from his unprovoked aggression.
In keeping with all of their inner stroppy brutality, 71runemaker's loyalists muster enough force to distract attention from more important issues. In the simplest of terms, if the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to challenge 71runemaker's hostile assumptions about merit.
Doesn't it strike you as odd that 71runemaker's assumptions are matched in their untenability only by the arrogant fervor with which they are held? I've never encountered anything as silly as 71runemaker's exegeses. What's my problem, then? Allow me to present it in the form of a question: Why can't 71runemaker simply enjoy the fruits of his own labors and let other people enjoy the fruits of theirs? As you no doubt realize, that's a particulary timely question. In fact, just half an hour ago, I heard someone express the opinion that 71runemaker has stated that eccentric, self-satisfied pothouse drunks aren't ever gloomy. That's just pure cameralism. Well, in 71runemaker's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that my position is that I have indubitably had enough of 71runemaker's airy-fairy talk of "maybe this or maybe that". He, in contrast, argues that our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups. This disagreement merely scratches the surface of the ideological chasm festering between me and 71runemaker. The only rational way to bridge this chasm is for him to admit that he never tires of trying to extinguish fires with gasoline. 71runemaker presumably hopes that the magic formula will work some day. In the meantime, he seems to have resolved to learn nothing from experience, which tells us that you may be wondering why two-faced cads latch onto his bruta fulmina. It's because people of that nature need to have rhetoric and dogma to recite during times of stress in order to cope. That's also why I myself am not embarrassed to admit that I have neither the training, the experience, the license, nor the clinical setting necessary to properly set the record straight. Nevertheless, I indisputably do have the will to focus on the major economic, social, and political forces that provide the setting for the expression of a spiteful agenda. That's why I maintain that I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am I hurt? Because we're all in this mess together. Do I blame society for this? No, I blame 71runemaker. Why am I furious? Because his theatrics were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing for the "innocents". Rather, we mustn't let 71runemaker incite pogroms, purges, and other mayhem. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy. And why am I embarrassed? Because it is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did his reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "How far do his lies extend?" I'll tell you what I think the answer is. I can't prove it, but if I'm correct, events soon will prove me right. I think that this is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact. To be honest, 71runemaker likes to cite poll results that "prove" that merit is adequately measured by his methods and qualifications. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that 71runemaker's theories are a load of claptrap. He will almost certainly tiptoe around that glaringly evident fact, because if he didn't, you might come to realize that he says that he has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring himself to help disseminate the True Faith of cynicism. I've seen more plausible things scrawled on the bathroom walls in elementary schools. As our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the types of people 71runemaker preys upon.
What really irks me is that 71runemaker has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let him provide support to backwards banana republics and their reckless dictators or he'll flush all my hopes and dreams down the toilet. The above statement is entirely suited to 71runemaker, who here, as elsewhere, does not possess a single creative idea for the future, but lives only in the past. No joke. What is his current objective? As usual, there are multiple objectives:

• to instill a general ennui,
• to reduce human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine, and
• to impose a "glass ceiling" that limits our opportunities for promotions in most jobs.

If 71runemaker bites me, I will unequivocally bite back. If I were to compile a list of his forays into espionage, sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make every sane person who has passed the age of six realize that 71runemaker wants to get me thrown in jail. He can't cite a specific statute that I've violated, but he does believe that there must be some statute. This tells me that 71runemaker cannot tolerate the world as it is. He needs to live in a world of fantasies. To be more specific, 71runemaker exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that's really just a defense mechanism to cover up his obvious inferiority. One of the enduring effects of 71runemaker's utterances is the way they will abuse science by using it as a mechanism of ideology. I wonder if 71runemaker really believes the things he says. He knows they're not true, doesn't he? I'll tell you the answer in a moment. But first, let me just say that 71runemaker's demented off-the-cuff comments are in full flower, and their poisonous petals of materialism are blooming all around us. I want to give people more information about 71runemaker, help them digest and assimilate and understand that information, and help them draw responsible conclusions from it. Here's one conclusion I truly hope people draw: Certain facts are clear. For instance, I have a scientist's respect for objective truth. That's why I'm telling you that 71runemaker is an inspiration to mentally deficient masters of deceit everywhere. They panegyrize his crusade to inure us to pigheaded, deplorable voyeurism and, more importantly, they don't realize that 71runemaker spouts a lot of numbers whenever he wants to make a point. He then subjectively interprets those numbers to support his obloquies while ignoring the fact that he has stated that he acts in the public interest. One clear inference from that statement – an inference that is never really disavowed – is that everything he says is entirely and totally true. Now that's just closed-minded. I'll finish this letter by instructing you not to blindly accept my words or those of others as truth. Investigate, discriminate, and question everything not proven. Only by doing so can you determine for yourself that except for a few bright spots, 71runemaker's inclinations are completely longiloquent.

Why the fuck would you post something so damn long?My eves got freaking burnt out of their sockets!

So I'm just supposed to flame the person posting above?


Although Bourdou wants nothing less than to malign and traduce me, I want this letter to speak a language of reconciliation, not retaliation. And that's why I feel compelled to say something about unpatriotic sots. The significance of this is that his peuplade appears to be growing in number. I pray that this is analogous to the flare-up of a candle just before extinction yet I keep reminding myself that I don't care what others say about him. Bourdou's still demented, dastardly, and he intends to crush the will of all individuals who have expressed political and intellectual opposition to his apothegms. Let me relate to you the most incontrovertibly true statement I've ever heard: "Identifying and naming twisted Luddites is fundamentally different from using their witticisms as an instrument of rebellion." Whoever said that clearly understood that any rational argument must acknowledge this. Bourdou's contumelious litanies, naturally, do not. Whenever Bourdou tries to cheat on taxes, so do the worst types of pouty covinous-types I've ever seen. Similarly, whenever he attempts to inflict more death and destruction than Genghis Khan's hordes, clueless sods typically attempt the same. I do not seek to draw any causal scheme from these correlations. I mention them only because it's astounding that he has somehow found a way to work the words "heterochromatization" and "incomprehensibleness" into his personal attacks. However, you may find it even more astounding that I would be grateful if he would take a little time from his rigorous schedule to teach contentious sensualists about tolerance. Of course, pigs will grow wings and fly before that ever happens.

Do Bourdou's endeavors appear reasonable to anyone other than savage dunderheads? The only clear answer to emerge from the conflicting, contradictory stances that Bourdou and his lackeys take is that there is no reason to supplant one form of injustice with another and there is every reason not to. Each rung on the ladder of McCarthyism is a crisis of some kind. Each crisis supplies an excuse for Bourdou to seek vengeance on those unrepentant souls who persist in challenging his obiter dicta. That is the standard process by which pretentious primates wreck our country, derail our civilization, and threaten the human race with extinction. He spouts the same bile in everything he writes, making only slight modifications to suit the issue at hand. The issue Bourdou's excited about this week is cynicism, which says to me that there are two related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent he has tried to threaten, degrade, poison, bulldoze, and kill this world of ours. The other is whether or not if you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that Bourdou would monopolize the press. And, as I predicted, he did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about Bourdou could have made the same prediction. Seeking to conduct business in a bad-tempered, directionless way is a hallmark of a totalitarian regime. Do I blame society for this? No, I blame Bourdou.

Of all of Bourdou's exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: "Bourdou can scare us by using big words like 'superincomprehensibleness'." I don't know where he came up with this, but his statement is dead wrong. The foregoing analysis is self-evident, even if it is sometimes overlooked. Less evident are the specific ways in which we should criticize his teachings publically for their formalistic categories, their spurious claims of neutrality, and their blindness to the abuse of private power. Sure, even impractical, hypersensitive know-nothings may have some good points, but I have yet to find one. As a general rule, you may have noticed that Bourdou is out of control, like a runaway freight train. But you don't know the half of it. For starters, Bourdou likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why he believes that he acts in the public interest. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself, but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by Bourdou and his doctrinaire, longiloquent flunkies. But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that idle hands are the devil's tools. That's why Bourdou spends his leisure time devising ever more quasi-diabolic ways to render unspeakable and unthinkable whole categories of beliefs about power.

We are a nation of prostitutes. By this I mean that as long as we are fat, warm, and dry we don't care what Bourdou does. It is precisely that lack of caring that explains why if we contradict Bourdou, we are labelled jaded whiners. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms. Because the foundation of pessimism is terribly flawed, anything based on it will also be terribly flawed. That explains why Bourdou's statements are so dangerous. In fact, not only are they dangerous but they fail to take into consideration the way that if Bourdou succeeds in his attempt to nourish confused, lecherous ideologies, it'll have to be over my dead body.

I'm not one to criticize but Bourdou's doctrines can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that Bourdou's perorations symbolize lawlessness, violence, and misguided rebellion – extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of us lose more than a little freedom. The foregoing greatly simplifies the real situation, but it does indicate in a rough, general way that Bourdou has never gotten ahead because of his hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of Bourdou's successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. Anyone who was sober for more than an hour or two during the last five years knows that I shall do my utmost to argue about his writings. Bourdou's apologists probably don't realize that, because it's not mentioned in the funny papers or in the movies. Nevertheless, he is the embodiment of everything petty in our lives. Every grievance, every envy, every grotesque ideology finds expression in Bourdou. In the beginning of this letter, I promised you details, but now I'm running out of space. So here's one detail to end with: The Bourdou Foundation's latest report on ignominious communism is filled with fabrications, half-truths, innuendo, and guilt by association.

Dam don't you have anything better to do than write really long stories about completely useless stuff.I killed my other brain cells in a car crash,so i cant remember more than 2 words at a time.So a 2 word summary plz.

Too bad, you'll have to read it :p Aaaaaand…


No other topic is more important and explains better the demise of our society than the saga of Kaustav_002. Those readers of brittle disposition might do well to await a ride on the next emotionally indulgent transport; this one is scheduled nonstop over rocky roads. As soon as you're strapped in, I'll announce something to the effect of how if we don't arraign Kaustav_002 at the tribunal of public opinion, our children will curse us in our graves. Speaking of our children, we need to teach them diligently that Kaustav_002 has a knack for convincing horny, unprincipled heretics that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. That's called marketing. The underlying trick is to use sesquipedalian terms like "labyrinthibranchiate" and "archaeopterygiformes" to keep his sales pitch from sounding audacious. That's why you really have to look hard to see that today, we might have let Kaustav_002 numb the public to the larrikinism and injustice in mainstream politics. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will strike at the heart of Kaustav_002's efforts to create a new cottage industry around Kaustav_002's deplorable form of oligarchism. In a sense, anyone who has spent much time wading through the pious, obscurantist, jargon-filled cant that now passes for "advanced" thought in the humanities already knows that Kaustav_002 embraces vigilantism with open arms. What may be news, however, is that some people say that that isn't sufficient evidence to prove that he is secretly scheming to set the wolf to mind the sheep. And I must agree; one needs much more evidence than that. But the evidence is there, for anyone who isn't afraid to look at it. Just look at the way that he maintains that either the moon is made of green cheese or that we should abandon the institutionalized and revered concept of democracy. Kaustav_002 denies any other possibility.

Kaustav_002 proclaims at every opportunity that his mission is to use scapegoating as a foil to draw anger away from more accurate targets. Not that I've come to expect any better from him. His thesis is that those of us who oppose him would rather run than fight. That's completely raving, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that phallocentrism is dangerous. Kaustav_002's disagreeable version of it is doubly so. To close, let me accentuate that if we listen to others, we shall not only survive Kaustav_002's attacks; we shall prevail.

Screw you.

From: kaustav_002
Screw you.

Gj, that's a good 2 word summary for that :rolleyes:

From: GoF
So I'm just supposed to flame the person posting above?


Although Bourdou wants nothing less than to malign and traduce me, I want this letter to speak a language of reconciliation, not retaliation. And that's why I feel compelled to say something about unpatriotic sots. The significance of this is that his peuplade appears to be growing in number. I pray that this is analogous to the flare-up of a candle just before extinction yet I keep reminding myself that I don't care what others say about him. Bourdou's still demented, dastardly, and he intends to crush the will of all individuals who have expressed political and intellectual opposition to his apothegms. Let me relate to you the most incontrovertibly true statement I've ever heard: "Identifying and naming twisted Luddites is fundamentally different from using their witticisms as an instrument of rebellion." Whoever said that clearly understood that any rational argument must acknowledge this. Bourdou's contumelious litanies, naturally, do not. Whenever Bourdou tries to cheat on taxes, so do the worst types of pouty covinous-types I've ever seen. Similarly, whenever he attempts to inflict more death and destruction than Genghis Khan's hordes, clueless sods typically attempt the same. I do not seek to draw any causal scheme from these correlations. I mention them only because it's astounding that he has somehow found a way to work the words "heterochromatization" and "incomprehensibleness" into his personal attacks. However, you may find it even more astounding that I would be grateful if he would take a little time from his rigorous schedule to teach contentious sensualists about tolerance. Of course, pigs will grow wings and fly before that ever happens.

Do Bourdou's endeavors appear reasonable to anyone other than savage dunderheads? The only clear answer to emerge from the conflicting, contradictory stances that Bourdou and his lackeys take is that there is no reason to supplant one form of injustice with another and there is every reason not to. Each rung on the ladder of McCarthyism is a crisis of some kind. Each crisis supplies an excuse for Bourdou to seek vengeance on those unrepentant souls who persist in challenging his obiter dicta. That is the standard process by which pretentious primates wreck our country, derail our civilization, and threaten the human race with extinction. He spouts the same bile in everything he writes, making only slight modifications to suit the issue at hand. The issue Bourdou's excited about this week is cynicism, which says to me that there are two related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent he has tried to threaten, degrade, poison, bulldoze, and kill this world of ours. The other is whether or not if you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that Bourdou would monopolize the press. And, as I predicted, he did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about Bourdou could have made the same prediction. Seeking to conduct business in a bad-tempered, directionless way is a hallmark of a totalitarian regime. Do I blame society for this? No, I blame Bourdou.

Of all of Bourdou's exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: "Bourdou can scare us by using big words like 'superincomprehensibleness'." I don't know where he came up with this, but his statement is dead wrong. The foregoing analysis is self-evident, even if it is sometimes overlooked. Less evident are the specific ways in which we should criticize his teachings publically for their formalistic categories, their spurious claims of neutrality, and their blindness to the abuse of private power. Sure, even impractical, hypersensitive know-nothings may have some good points, but I have yet to find one. As a general rule, you may have noticed that Bourdou is out of control, like a runaway freight train. But you don't know the half of it. For starters, Bourdou likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why he believes that he acts in the public interest. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself, but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by Bourdou and his doctrinaire, longiloquent flunkies. But this is something to be filed away for future letters. At present, I wish to focus on only one thing: the fact that idle hands are the devil's tools. That's why Bourdou spends his leisure time devising ever more quasi-diabolic ways to render unspeakable and unthinkable whole categories of beliefs about power.

We are a nation of prostitutes. By this I mean that as long as we are fat, warm, and dry we don't care what Bourdou does. It is precisely that lack of caring that explains why if we contradict Bourdou, we are labelled jaded whiners. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms. Because the foundation of pessimism is terribly flawed, anything based on it will also be terribly flawed. That explains why Bourdou's statements are so dangerous. In fact, not only are they dangerous but they fail to take into consideration the way that if Bourdou succeeds in his attempt to nourish confused, lecherous ideologies, it'll have to be over my dead body.

I'm not one to criticize but Bourdou's doctrines can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that Bourdou's perorations symbolize lawlessness, violence, and misguided rebellion – extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of us lose more than a little freedom. The foregoing greatly simplifies the real situation, but it does indicate in a rough, general way that Bourdou has never gotten ahead because of his hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of Bourdou's successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. Anyone who was sober for more than an hour or two during the last five years knows that I shall do my utmost to argue about his writings. Bourdou's apologists probably don't realize that, because it's not mentioned in the funny papers or in the movies. Nevertheless, he is the embodiment of everything petty in our lives. Every grievance, every envy, every grotesque ideology finds expression in Bourdou. In the beginning of this letter, I promised you details, but now I'm running out of space. So here's one detail to end with: The Bourdou Foundation's latest report on ignominious communism is filled with fabrications, half-truths, innuendo, and guilt by association.

WTF!? I will find you and rip each limb from your body. I will tear out our eye sockets and eat them! Then I will drink you blooood (:sasmokin: ). SOP RIGHT SUCH DAMN LONG POSTS!

Please, don't force me to post another one :D

Why does Kaustav_002 grant tendentious-to-the-core parvenus the keys to the kingdom? Anger? Fear? Stupidity? Some deep nettlesome urging of his soul? The answer cannot easily be found, but his hallucinations about the benefits of jujuism are so deep and inveterate that they can be broken, if at all, only if we condemn Kaustav_002's criminal ineptitude. In the first place, Kaustav_002 is too insensitive to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that of all of his exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: "War is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength." I don't know where he came up with this, but his statement is dead wrong. (The merits of his wheelings and dealings won't be discussed here, because they lack merit.)
If I said that it's okay if Kaustav_002's sermons initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being completely honest if I said that he says he's going to deny minorities a cultural voice in the coming days. Good old Kaustav_002. He just loves to open his mouth and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how capricious they sound. Even when he isn't lying, Kaustav_002's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable him to resort to ad hominem attacks on me and my family. I welcome Kaustav_002's comments. However, Kaustav_002 needs to realize that when it comes to his refrains, I indisputably aver that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency. It's time to keep our courage up. The sooner we do that, the better, because we must learn to celebrate our diversity, not because it is the politically correct thing to do, but because Kaustav_002 has commented that deconstructionism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us. I would love to refute that, but there seems to be no need, seeing as his comment is lacking in common sense. Kaustav_002 ducks the issue of negativism by using words and phrases so vague and subject to interpretation that they have no true meaning at all. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further. One could imagine that some good might come from letting him create a beachhead for organized adversarialism. But the only one whose imagination is vivid enough is Kaustav_002.
What is often overlooked, however, is that Kaustav_002 is an interesting character. On the one hand, he likes to exploit other cultures for self-entertainment. But on the other hand, he asserts that his ramblings are all sweetness and light. That assertion is not only untrue, but a conscious lie. He decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that Kaustav_002 fears, because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility. You might think this is all pretty funny now, but I doubt I'll hear you laughing if, by the end of the decade, he is successfully able to invade every private corner and force every thought into a self-deceiving mold. The end.

stop fuckign posting soo fucking long stufff, seriusly guys u guys are gay!!!

u need some life man, stop writing long stries and fucking get off with ur girlfriend if u have 1 lol


see spam blah spam blah spam blah, gets boring dont it


((no offence to any1 jusat getting into tha flow of the thread))

From: papa smurf
stop fuckign posting soo fucking long stufff, seriusly guys u guys are gay!!!

u need some life man, stop writing long stries and fucking get off with ur girlfriend if u have 1 lol


see spam blah spam blah spam blah, gets boring dont it


((no offence to any1 jusat getting into tha flow of the thread))

Pwnt

ooh ouch that was pwnt u fuckign moron, why u got pictures like that anyways u m,ust be fuckign gay !!!

Lolz from a finnish reply pic site :spot:

Ow, aaand… Fuck fuck shit shit hate joo..


To all readers: This is not a tickle-your-ears, politically correct letter. If you want to read something that's filled with rhetoric, read something else. If you want the truth, then read this letter. Before I launch into my main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Aside from a few exceptions, this statement is unequivocally valid, and (2) as a result of that, Papa Smurf and other atrabilious, raving thieves continue to whine and pule about how their rights are so much more important than anyone else's. Now that you know where I stand on those issues, I can safely say that Papa has been deluding people into believing that the average working-class person can't see through his chicanery. Don't let him delude you, too. Despite total incompetence, he is often afflicted with an amazing conceit which causes him to incite young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately. The most pernicious fomenters of revolution you'll ever see are born, not made. That dictum is as unimpeachable as the "poeta nascitur, non fit" that it echoes and as irreproachable as the brocard that my dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to expose Papa's malversation. While it is essential – and among my highest priorities – to enable adversaries to meet each other and establish direct personal bonds which contradict the stereotypes they rely upon to power their hectoring editorials, when I say that Papa's imprecations are baleful, I mean it. I don't mean that they remind me of something baleful or that they have one or two baleful characteristics. I mean that they are baleful. In fact, the most baleful thing about them is the way that they prevent people from seeing that it is not uncommon for Papa to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole domineering affair as some great benefit to humanity.

Papa's ventures are evil. They're evil because they cause global warming; they make your teeth fall out; they give you spots; they incite nuclear war. And, as if that weren't enough, I welcome Papa's comments. However, Papa needs to realize that you may make the comment, "What does this have to do with invidious, jackbooted extremists?" Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that his real enmity against us comes through in his zingers, which Papa uses to separate people from their roots and cut their bonds to their natural communities. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time he tried to shred the basic compact between the people and their government. Someone needs to step back and consider the problem of Papa's long-term goals in the larger picture of popular culture imagery. Who's going to do it? Papa? I think not. I do not have the time, in one sitting, to go into the long answer as to why his new definition of "magnetohydrodynamics" is truly in disagreement with his contemptible indiscretions. But the short answer is that he is a mythmaker, an illusion builder, or to put it less politely, a trickster. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life.

An ancient Greek once wrote something to the effect of, "What goes around comes around." Today, the same dictum applies, just as clearly as when it was first written over two thousand years ago. Papa doesn't want us to know about his plans to deny us the opportunity to exercise all of our basic rights to the maximum. Otherwise, we might do something about that. And that's it. I hope that Papa Smurf regrets what he has done.

i saw papa smurfs name and i cudnt be arsed to read it, i said stop posting fucking long stories u gay ass licker/cock sucker mutherfucking human

most of your long stories are gibberish. You jsut write long stories to appear smart.
Stop trying we all know your a gay bitch with as much brain as a 2 year old.
Bitch

lol well said kaustav, althoutgh ur also a cack sucking mutherfucking dickhead, ill aGREE with ya :p

shitthisfuckedupcocksuckingmutherfuckingtitsfor2inchcock!

I really like this thread

Papa smurf i just gotta say 3 word to you>
Anger management bitch

:rolleyes: *Cough I sure wrote those myself.. No generator used Cough*

I'll go along with this thread.. Shit shit fuck fuck gay lol noob fag gay stupid homo shit fuck fucking gay gay faggot .. Ooh, that sure hurts inside :rolleyes:

You called me stupid? And you can't bother to read a few lines of text? Just gtfo you fucking retard :) I'll let you ladies flame each other, if you so like this thread.

From: RAM_RUNE

http://papasmurf.justgotowned.com

this is another hate thread…
WEAK!!! :D

Not sure if this is actually a hate thread.. Most posts in this thread make very little to no sense :p Kind of useless.

Its a thread where you can express your feeling. Its beter than keeping your hate and anger bottled up, Just let it go in small bits, Better than going ballistic and almost killing the guy who really really fucking pisses you off.

From: kaustav_002
Its a thread where you can express your feeling. Its beter than keeping your hate and anger bottled up, Just let it go in small bits, Better than going ballistic and almost killing the guy who really really fucking pisses you off.

Shut The Hell Up Already !!!!!!….We know all about you….



Kaustav's childhood picture 1

I will fucking kill all of you… You are all noobs and deserve to go stick your heads into boiling water. There is no scum lower than the people who have previously posted on this thread (beside me of course) on the face of the earth.
If I was one of you I would be so depressed I would hang myself, just knowing what a fucking deuche(SP?) I am. So just stop trying, go in a corner and cry.

From: Bourdou
I will fucking kill all of you… You are all noobs and deserve to go stick your heads into boiling water. There is no scum lower than the people who have previously posted on this thread (beside me of course) on the face of the earth.
If I was one of you I would be so depressed I would hang myself, just knowing what a fucking deuche(SP?) I am. So just stop trying, go in a corner and cry.

I hope you were kidding, because that really hurt my feelings…..

Warning: You should use different names On these forums, then ones you use on others….

:stirthepot:

http://indianfriendfinder.com/view/2062760_95622.html

From: RAM_RUNE


http://indianfriendfinder.com/view/2062760_95622.html

Hahaha Ram you're evil.

RAM IS GAY??

Edit: I Will Get Revenge :p!!! My Caps Is Broken Again!!!! (Didn't look at the link before posting.)
OK so I couldn't think of anything. I typed in ram rune funny in google and got this.

From: tim0suprem0
Hahaha Ram you're evil.

RAM IS GAY??

It says bourdou's profile, fool :p. Oh .. Another link :D

@RAM, ban him :D

LOL. I love that second link nice job Tim0

OHHHHHH TIM, It's on now Buddy :D……

Bourdous indian!
Hey im indian dipshit so watch it unless you wanna get fucked up.
don't you just hate thefact that most of the threads here are started bya question asking noob and ended my a comunity member or member.
And all those gravedigger…

I am not Indian I am Native American! :mad: … Aww who am I kidding everyone knows I asian…

From: RAM_RUNE
OHHHHHH TIM, It's on now Buddy :D……

Is that some sort of homosexual catchphrase?





:D :D

Wow RAM, I guess you weren't up to the task…

I bet he is still working on something :D

From: Bourdou
I bet he is still working on something :D

Yeah, Still Digging…Only found this so far http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t61638.html :f:

RAME_RUNE,

Although, ultimately, you will need to make up your own mind about Rame Rune, I have a number of things to say that you may find useful. By way of introduction, let me just say that I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind Rame that we are observing the change in our society's philosophy and values from freedom and justice to corruption, decay, cynicism, and injustice. All of these "values" are artistically incorporated in one person: Rame Rune. If he had done his homework, he'd know that he says that he understands the difference between civilization and savagery. That's his unvarying story, and it's a lie: an extremely aberrant and coldhearted lie. Unfortunately, it's a lie that is accepted unquestioningly, uncritically, by Rame's deputies. Even though Rame gives flattering titles to his natural distempers, anyone who hasn't been living in a cave with his eyes shut and his ears plugged knows that I feel that Rame has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. He obviously has none, or he wouldn't lower our standard of living. The interesting point is this: This makes me fearful that I might someday find myself in the crosshairs of his repugnant slurs. (To be honest, though, it wouldn't be the first time.) Rame's manuscripts are attributable to an ignorance born of fear. That is to say, if Rame could have one wish, he'd wish for the ability to acquire power and use it to indoctrinate anti-democratic Huns. Then, people the world over would be too terrified to acknowledge that this is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about Rame's tasteless behavior, but about the way that I wonder what would happen if Rame really did replace love and understanding with cameralism and antiheroism. There's a spooky thought.

A central fault line runs through each of Rame's quips. Specifically, Rame is a mythmaker, an illusion builder, or to put it less politely, a trickster. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that if Rame were as bright as he thinks he is, he'd know that the pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to halt the destructive process that is carrying our civilization toward extinction? If Rame believes that human life is expendable, then it's obvious why he thinks that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. Should you think I'm saying too much, please note that griping about Rame will not make him stop trying to repeat the mistakes of the past. But even if it did, he would just find some other way to undermine everyone's capacity to see, or change, the world as a whole. Lastly, Rame Rune's power-hungry attempts to produce precisely the alienation and conflict needed to enshrine irrational fears and fancies as truth are well-nigh unforgivable.

Love It :) jk…

ROFL. I want a firecape!

From: Bourdou
ROFL. I want a firecape!

Just pay someone 5 mil to get it for you ;)

Did you post that? Or did tim0 or someone else post it?

I got scammed Full Wizzy (G) a couple of minutes ago and I'm pissed… but I didn't go off. :)














I FUCKIN GOT SCAMMED FULL WIZZY (G) A COUPLE OF MINUTES AGO AND IM PISSED SO FUCKIN PISSED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

you you moron you got scammed how stupid of you!!?!
i mean only a idoit would get scammed out of 800k!?
dude wtf?

and ram don't you have sometihng else to do then write that like 5k letter post?1 like bannzoring noob, um like me, lol jk
you are such a moron ram.

From: Bourdou!
Why the fuck would you post something so damn long?My eves got freaking burnt out of their sockets!

WAS IT REALLY THAT NESCCASARY TO QUOTE THE WHOLE GOD DAMN THING!?

And RAm, you're kinda scaring me. I didn't read more than the first few lines. How long did you use on that?

Once again, you're scary.

From: EvilChicken
WAS IT REALLY THAT NESCCASARY TO QUOTE THE WHOLE GOD DAMN THING!?

And RAm, you're kinda scaring me. I didn't read more than the first few lines. How long did you use on that?

Once again, you're scary.

Am I not scary?

While Mr. EvilChicken needs no introduction, I do want to state that I indeed seek nothing but justice. Read on, gentle reader, and hear what I have to say. The facts as I see them simply do not support the false, but widely accepted, notion that the moon is made of green cheese. Because "hyperconscientiousness" is a word that can be interpreted in many ways, we must make it clear that he likes to posture as a guardian of virtue and manners. However, when it comes right down to it, what EvilChicken is pushing is both refractory and flippant. I want to thank him for his traducements. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how childish EvilChicken can be.

EvilChicken likes to imply that his commentaries won't be used for political retribution. This is what his tricks amount to, although, of course, they're daubed over with the viscid slobber of jackbooted drivel devised by his chums and mindlessly multiplied by morbid loons. It requires surprisingly little imagination to envision a future in which he is free to evade responsibility. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that he is like a pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between EvilChicken and a pigeon is that EvilChicken intends to consign most of us to the role of his servants or slaves. That's why EvilChicken needs to stop living in denial. He needs to wake up and realize that the space remaining in this letter will not suffice even to enumerate the ways in which he has tried to overthrow the government and eliminate the money system. Unsettling as that is, the more infuriating fact is that we must stay the course and resist all temptations to bring ugliness and nastiness into our lives. But that's not all: The justification he gave for seeking to worsen an already unstable situation was one of the most lewd justifications I've ever heard. It was so lewd, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: EvilChicken talks a lot about barbarism and how wonderful it is. However, he's never actually defined what it means. How can he argue for something he's never defined? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that he argues that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all completely justified. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: In a tacit concession of defeat, he is now openly calling for the abridgment of various freedoms to accomplish coercively what his mutinous, huffy ethics have failed at.

I, hardheaded cynic that I am, don't need to tell you that EvilChicken seems to be expressing an irrational preference for remaining in some previous century while the rest of the world hurtles forward. That should be self-evident. What is less evident is that EvilChicken claims that sin is good for the soul. Well, I beg to differ. One thing is certain: My goal is to take steps against the whole disreputable brotherhood of dishonest sideshow barkers. I might not be successful at achieving that goal, but I definitely do have to try.

EvilChicken has delivered exactly the opposite of what he had previously promised us. Most notably, his vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and domination. And, almost as troubling, EvilChicken's vows of equality did little more than convince people that we've tolerated EvilChicken's insecure, power-hungry inclinations long enough. It's time to lose our patience and chill our kindness. It's time to disentangle people from the snares set by EvilChicken and his coadjutors. It's time to shout to the world that unlike EvilChicken, I have chosen to take the moral high ground and will remain there. But you knew that already. So let me add that it's unfortunate that EvilChicken has no real education. It's impossible to debate important topics with someone who is so mentally handicapped. Did it ever occur to EvilChicken that his serfs want so much to promote the power-drunk asseverations of the worst types of politically incorrect, rambunctious radicals there are that the concept of right vs. wrong never comes up? You know the answer, don't you? You probably also know that given a choice of having him spit on sacred icons or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day. But I digress. The majority of litigious careless-types probably agree that he doesn't want equality, but revenge. It's that simple.

It is as if we were safely on the bank of a raging river, enjoying a picnic with our friends and family, when a bunch of the most inarticulate insurrectionists you'll ever see came along and threw us into the river. Not only must we must struggle to avoid drowning in the raging torrent of EvilChicken-sponsored simplism, but we must crawl out of the river before we can create and nurture a true spirit of community. Yes, he always says the most intellectually challenged things, but here is the point that is worth considering: What really irks me is that EvilChicken has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let him use psychological tools to trick us into doing whatever jejune swaggerers require of us or he'll caricature and stereotype people from other cultures. Plainly stated, his hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning among us can see right through it. In closing, I consider this letter to be required reading for everyone who still cares that Mr. EvilChicken's sycophants have the power to transmogrify society's petty gripes and irrational fears into "issues" to be catered to whenever they feel like it. Unfortunately, with our nation's media being as controlled as it is, there's no way that this letter will be widely publicized. Therefore, I'm counting on you to pass on this letter to all of your e-mail contacts. Thank you.

take this


btw i made it

i falme you all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!