From: Taric
I wouldn't even go as far as grandfathering in the Jr+ members that don't have the new requirements… The ones who actually want the title would work towards the new requirements.
(I am aware that this would take away my shiny green title :p)
Maybe even throw rep into the requirements. Right now its only function is being a green box xD
I agree with you and others. Most Jr. Members that are active and contribute probably wouldn't care if they (temporarily) lost their rank due to requirement updates.
I myself am an OG Junior, I got the rank back when the requirements were 300 posts and 6 months registered time. I have no complaints that the requirements were since lowered, I don't feel like it devalues the rank very much.
However comma, the problem lies in that the requirements for Jr. Membership are 1) low and 2) most quickly achievable by spamming the board. Honestly, I hardly even blame these people - I'd probably spam too if I was them. Doesn't make it okay, you can see their position. Forced to increase their postcount to access a higher board.
If one wishes to meet a requirement of postcount, what can one do except post? Granted, the 30 posts should be meaningful (introduction, asking questions, posting first scripts/progress reports/extensive feedback/constructive criticsm) but we can't expect to ever see that unless we proactively enforce it - and we're not currently, we're taking a reactive approach.
Isn't SRL about contribution and learning? Why, then, is our first rank-up dependent almost solely on postcount? Growing one's e-peen == attaining a rank?
I
strongly agree with the reputation idea. Toss out the postcount requirement entirely please, suqeezing out 30 forced posts does not a Jr. Member make. Two (or more) green squares, however, and you can be sure that person is deserving of a rank-up.