jhildy
2014-09-11 14:30:22
Well it's official now. Randoms are optional so they will no longer break any scripts. What does everyone think about this? Seems like nothing else has been implemented that wasn't there before to stop simba botting.
2014-09-11 14:30:22
2014-09-11 14:53:04
2014-09-11 17:04:22
2014-09-11 21:41:24
From: hakishakataki
on a side note, it still might be a good idea for bots to do some randoms, to make it look less like a bot.
2014-09-12 02:10:24
2014-09-12 02:38:19
From: Solar
I would never waste my time with randoms so I don't think doing them would be any form of 'antiban'. To me, I'd just think it was a waste of time, even the exp reward random events.
2014-09-12 10:32:47
From: Solar
I would never waste my time with randoms so I don't think doing them would be any form of 'antiban'. To me, I'd just think it was a waste of time, even the exp reward random events.
2014-09-12 12:02:59
From: Incurable
Some of us would solve them all, some of us would solve a few that we think are useful, and some of us would just ignore the lot. Our personal preference towards solving randoms is irrelevant. To me, solvers for the popular randoms should still be written so that those who would solve them still have a choice.
2014-09-12 12:32:03
From: Solar
From: IncurableThen it should be your responsibility to script for the randoms. I don't think there should SRL or even reflection development for them anymore since it isn't required as even antiban.
Some of us would solve them all, some of us would solve a few that we think are useful, and some of us would just ignore the lot. Our personal preference towards solving randoms is irrelevant. To me, solvers for the popular randoms should still be written so that those who would solve them still have a choice.
2014-09-12 12:34:02
From: Solar
Then it should be your responsibility to script for the randoms. I don't think there should SRL or even reflection development for them anymore since it isn't required as even antiban.
From: slacky
^ that.. it's just a waist of time to write random-solvers when they are never, ever, ever, ever needed…
heck if you love randoms so much.. solve am manually…
2014-09-12 12:40:27
From: Incurable
We don't know for sure that it's not required, Jagex may still use people completely ignoring randoms as a way to flag a suspicious player. They completely removed them from RS3 and relocated them, why not do the same thing in OSRS? Either way, I personally think it's necessary, but that's not for me to decide.
2014-09-12 16:34:19
2014-09-12 18:54:58
From: hakishakataki
I dont know guys. I'm with solar on this one, not doing randoms at all is a reason to be under suspicion.
2014-09-13 00:22:02
From: Solar
I basically said the opposite…
2014-09-13 04:23:51
2014-09-13 04:23:57
From: Solar
I would never waste my time with randoms so I don't think doing them would be any form of 'antiban'. To me, I'd just think it was a waste of time, even the exp reward random events.
2014-09-13 06:20:56
2014-09-13 06:41:40
From: Harrier
The only thing any include needs is a fail safe incase the script miss clicks on the random and gets tele'd (Assuming they are 1 click)
2014-09-13 12:33:11