The whole script is based on static clicks so I doubt this is going to run longer than a few seconds. Try using FindColor and reading more tutorials to find the tree's based on color.
NiteLeaf
2013-07-26 06:50:45
From: J J
The whole script is based on static clicks so I doubt this is going to run longer than a few seconds. Try using FindColor and reading more tutorials to find the tree's based on color.
Have you tried it? It works longer than a few seconds regardless what it's made from… Pressing Compass fixes that.
wayiyi
2013-07-26 19:18:01
Anyone can make better script with ghost mouse.
From: NiteLeaf
Have you tried it? It works longer than a few seconds regardless what it's made from… Pressing Compass fixes that.
So a couple mins? I don't want to bash you but it's just not going to work long and it will end up getting people banned.. (not to mention moveMouse…)
Chris!
2013-07-26 20:36:07
It's nice to see that you've tried to create a script Niteleaf, but a script as simple as this will simply get users banned very quickly.
NiteLeaf
2013-07-26 21:48:21
From: wayiyi
Anyone can make better script with ghost mouse.
Well then, I don't see anyone doing it.
From: Officer Barbrady
So a couple mins? I don't want to bash you but it's just not going to work long and it will end up getting people banned.. (not to mention moveMouse…)
It does work I told you compass fixes it.
From: Chris!
It's nice to see that you've tried to create a script Niteleaf, but a script as simple as this will simply get users banned very quickly.
Thanks, but simple is better than complicated isn't it? :p
From: NiteLeaf
Well then, I don't see anyone doing it.
It does work I told you compass fixes it.
Thanks, but simple is better than complicated isn't it? :p
No, because your script is literately making the mouse jump like 500 pixels across the screen in 0 ms over and over on the same coords ;);)
Chris!
2013-07-27 02:11:02
From: NiteLeaf
Thanks, but simple is better than complicated isn't it? :p
Complicated scripts, 9 times out of 10, are better.
As Officer said, your script static clicks on the same spots over and over again, changing for different actions. No antiban, no failsafes or anything.
NiteLeaf
2013-07-27 21:52:24
From: Officer Barbrady
No, because your script is literately making the mouse jump like 500 pixels across the screen in 0 ms over and over on the same coords ;);)
Umm well, Jagex can't actually track it can they? I think all this 'antiban' isn't required..
From: Chris!
Complicated scripts, 9 times out of 10, are better.
As Officer said, your script static clicks on the same spots over and over again, changing for different actions. No antiban, no failsafes or anything.
What I'm saying is if it's more complicated more things are likely to go wrong.
Well if u wanna get banned guys, look no further. This script is made for it.
From: NiteLeaf
Umm well, Jagex can't actually track it can they? I think all this 'antiban' isn't required..
What I'm saying is if it's more complicated more things are likely to go wrong.
Yes.. jagex can detect your mouse moving across the screen in 0 ms.
From: Officer Barbrady
Yes.. jagex can detect your mouse moving across the screen in 0 ms.
Give me hard evidence, cause that seems like bs.
From: Sjoe
Give me hard evidence, cause that seems like bs.
Clicking* my bad. They can detect you clicking one spot and then clicking the next 500 px away with no mouse movement.
also static waits and no failsafes.
From: Officer Barbrady
Clicking* my bad. They can detect you clicking one spot and then clicking the next 500 px away with no mouse movement.
also static waits and no failsafes.
Yeah I always wanted to test that, could use this script lol.
Chris!
2013-07-28 03:33:57
From: NiteLeaf
What I'm saying is if it's more complicated more things are likely to go wrong.
You couldn't be any further from the truth even if you tried. Take a look at all of Ashaman's script, they're all complicated and all I need to say is he ran one of them for 1 month.
Complicated > simple.
Sometimes simple is good, but this simple… Nah uh.
NiteLeaf
2013-07-28 04:24:07
From: Sjoe
Well if u wanna get banned guys, look no further. This script is made for it.
Has anyone gotten banned with this script yet?
From: Officer Barbrady
Clicking* my bad. They can detect you clicking one spot and then clicking the next 500 px away with no mouse movement.
also static waits and no failsafes.
How do you know that? Do you have any evidence on it?
From: Chris!
You couldn't be any further from the truth even if you tried. Take a look at all of Ashaman's script, they're all complicated and all I need to say is he ran one of them for 1 month.
Complicated > simple.
Sometimes simple is good, but this simple… Nah uh.
Well, that leaves a loophole in Jagex's system. Who plays 1 Month straight? If they can't track that and work out that the player isn't legit, then I doubt they can track, mouse clicks. Or would even.
Chris!
2013-07-28 05:15:51
From: NiteLeaf
Well, that leaves a loophole in Jagex's system. Who plays 1 Month straight? If they can't track that and work out that the player isn't legit, then I doubt they can track, mouse clicks. Or would even.
You're sadly mistaken. Mouse movements, especially repetitive ones that move to that exact same pixel every single time it loops are highly detectable and will get you banned EXTREMELY quickly, plus without failsafes you have no way of running it for more than 10 minutes as something will happen.
There's no loophole in Jagex's system, it's just
@Ashaman88 is a bloody hoon and is one of the best scripters we have here at SRL. Take a look at any of his scripts, they act almost human-like, it's bloody amazing.
Thief
2013-07-28 06:29:40
Well, that leaves a loophole in Jagex's system. Who plays 1 Month straight? If they can't track that and work out that the player isn't legit, then I doubt they can track, mouse clicks. Or would even.
He probably also had a break system implemented in his scripts, so it's not like his character was on 24/7.
It was nice of you to share this script, but it needs a lot more anti ban etc for people to actually use it.
If you need help with the anti-ban, ask around - I'm sure members would be happy to help.
From: pure_thief
He probably also had a break system implemented in his scripts, so it's not like his character was on 24/7.
It was nice of you to share this script, but it needs a lot more anti ban etc for people to actually use it.
If you need help with the anti-ban, ask around - I'm sure members would be happy to help.
Actually it was a month straight, only was logged out while reloading the client after 6 hours and RS updates apparently :)
NiteLeaf
2013-07-28 07:40:59
From: Chris!
You're sadly mistaken. Mouse movements, especially repetitive ones that move to that exact same pixel every single time it loops are highly detectable and will get you banned EXTREMELY quickly, plus without failsafes you have no way of running it for more than 10 minutes as something will happen.
There's no loophole in Jagex's system, it's just @Ashaman88 is a bloody hoon and is one of the best scripters we have here at SRL. Take a look at any of his scripts, they act almost human-like, it's bloody amazing.
Sorry but how I said before, do you have any proof that they track the pixels that you are clicking? For example, I know many people that auto click with Gary'shood and haven't gotten banned after getting 99 magic.
From: pure_thief
He probably also had a break system implemented in his scripts, so it's not like his character was on 24/7.
It was nice of you to share this script, but it needs a lot more anti ban etc for people to actually use it.
If you need help with the anti-ban, ask around - I'm sure members would be happy to help.
As I said before, I don't believe in anti-ban.
From: BMWxi
Actually it was a month straight, only was logged out while reloading the client after 6 hours and RS updates apparently :)
Ashaman88
2013-07-28 08:30:56
From: NiteLeaf
Sorry but how I said before, do you have any proof that they track the pixels that you are clicking? For example, I know many people that auto click with Gary'shood and haven't gotten banned after getting 99 magic.
As I said before, I don't believe in anti-ban.
There have been years of data supporting that. I'm not going to drag up proof, but if you don't trust the word here, then find out for yourself when you get banned. People just wanted to warn others away from a script this risky. You should really read through some of the tutorials on color finding and such and also read through other peoples scripts. Straight up coord clicking has been a no no for a long time
Wu-Tang Clan
2013-07-28 09:01:59
Really guys? A guy makes his first script before an official include has been made and its your duty to destroy him? I'm quite dissappointed to say the least.. Niteleaf, I'm happy you took the initiative to make a script. You have done more than many community members have. That in itself is a great start, no matter what kind of start it is. I encourage you to start learning better object finding methods such as DTM, TPA, or even FindObj. As aforementioned, you are using static clicks and waits and the script may not work for 6 hours, but at least it compiles and you understand what you wrote instead of copy/pasting a TPA into your script with no knowledge of its function. I myself make my scripts from the base up, starting with findobj to make sure the object can even be found quick enough, then I convert to TPA in the fixing stage, and finally fine tune to get past 6 hours. As of now, SRL if making a new include for RS3, so the 6 hour fix won't work yet.
Anyways, take the other members CONSTRUCTIVE criticism into consideration and become an even greater scripter.
Hope to see more from you soon!
Sulferx
2013-07-28 09:55:48
From: NiteLeaf
Sorry but how I said before, do you have any proof that they track the pixels that you are clicking? For example, I know many people that auto click with Gary'shood and haven't gotten banned after getting 99 magic.
There's a huge difference between a stationary autoclicker and coordinate-based clicking like this. Coordinate based movement is suicide. I got an account banned for something like this back in
2008. I promise you Botwatch will tear this thing apart.
I think most of us are grateful for your eagerness to help the community out, but it's only fair that we tell you the truth. No one should use this.
NiteLeaf
2013-07-28 16:50:08
From: Ashaman88
There have been years of data supporting that. I'm not going to drag up proof, but if you don't trust the word here, then find out for yourself when you get banned. People just wanted to warn others away from a script this risky. You should really read through some of the tutorials on color finding and such and also read through other peoples scripts. Straight up coord clicking has been a no no for a long time
From: Joseph D
Really guys? A guy makes his first script before an official include has been made and its your duty to destroy him? I'm quite dissappointed to say the least.. Niteleaf, I'm happy you took the initiative to make a script. You have done more than many community members have. That in itself is a great start, no matter what kind of start it is. I encourage you to start learning better object finding methods such as DTM, TPA, or even FindObj. As aforementioned, you are using static clicks and waits and the script may not work for 6 hours, but at least it compiles and you understand what you wrote instead of copy/pasting a TPA into your script with no knowledge of its function. I myself make my scripts from the base up, starting with findobj to make sure the object can even be found quick enough, then I convert to TPA in the fixing stage, and finally fine tune to get past 6 hours. As of now, SRL if making a new include for RS3, so the 6 hour fix won't work yet.
Anyways, take the other members CONSTRUCTIVE criticism into consideration and become an even greater scripter.
Hope to see more from you soon!
From: Sulferx
There's a huge difference between a stationary autoclicker and coordinate-based clicking like this. Coordinate based movement is suicide. I got an account banned for something like this back in 2008. I promise you Botwatch will tear this thing apart.
I think most of us are grateful for your eagerness to help the community out, but it's only fair that we tell you the truth. No one should use this.
Well, thanks for the constructive criticism guys, I'm not going to repeat what I said for the last few posts, but however this script is working perfectly fine for me, no bans yet. I'll take a look at other methods like TPA but right now going to stick with mouseclicks until I have time.
Hoodz
2013-07-28 16:58:18
nice to see you try to script!
tip: you should use Tpa or just findobject.
NiteLeaf
2013-07-29 17:40:44
From: hoodz
nice to see you try to script!
tip: you should use Tpa or just findobject.
Thanks for the advice. :)
Squigglyo
2013-08-09 06:07:16
Take the download offline.
While its great your learning… this is a terrible script. Dont post scripts when reputable scripters tell it will get people banned.
this is your first script, don't question people that have been coding longer than you've been playing.
This script litteraly screams 'I AM A BOT! LOOK AT ME JAGEX!'
You have no randoms waiting, no random mouse positions, no anti ban, no checking for problems… the more i look at it, the angrier it makes me…
Kevin
2013-08-09 11:30:49
From: Squigglyo
Take the download offline.
While its great your learning… this is a terrible script. Dont post scripts when reputable scripters tell it will get people banned.
this is your first script, don't question people that have been coding longer than you've been playing.
This script litteraly screams 'I AM A BOT! LOOK AT ME JAGEX!'
You have no randoms waiting, no random mouse positions, no anti ban, no checking for problems… the more i look at it, the angrier it makes me…
Or as opposed to removing it completely and no longer allowing revisions/suggestions on how it could be improved to avoid said issues, it could simply be moved to the First Scripts section where it would be more openly acknowledged as such and could be accepted more openly as a WIP.
Squigglyo
2013-08-09 22:02:08
From: Kevin
Or as opposed to removing it completely and no longer allowing revisions/suggestions on how it could be improved to avoid said issues, it could simply be moved to the First Scripts section where it would be more openly acknowledged as such and could be accepted more openly as a WIP.
He's been given advice and he has pretty much said he knows everything and its a perfect script. he's pretty much told everyone that they are wrong and his script wont get you banned when it obviosly will. Thats the issue here.
The fact that its a new script and he is new isnt the issue. Im all for new scripters, but they cant walk around like there script doesnt stink when they are clearly new at this.
I don't mean to take you down or anything, but a script like this will most likely not run for a long time and you will be always adjusting and restarting for it to work.
You have the basics but you should't keep there and make a script and hope it is good. You should hop to beginner-intermediate tutorials, and you'll see that you'll start making awesome scripts that run longer.
masterBB
2013-08-10 12:55:29
Nice first script! Keep 'm going!
As mentioned before there are a few things where you can improve. May I suggest adding SetupSRL; in the beginning to setup the srl mouse. The Replace MoveMouse with MMouse.
The big reason why I suggest that is because the MoveMouse function teleports your mouse to a new location. Even though a human would have to move it there. They won't ban you instantly, but it is a big red flag.