xxpoopyxx
2013-05-30 13:49:20
I was curious about the reasons "Jagex" is allowed to sue companies for publishing software they don't like?
2013-05-30 13:49:20
2013-05-30 13:56:33
2013-05-30 14:49:34
2013-05-30 14:51:13
2013-05-30 15:13:33
2013-05-30 15:20:49
From: Goatchees
OSBOT and TRIBOT of perfect examples of what Jagex will go after. They are making thousands of dollars of "selling" their product. Their Selling the exploits for Jagex's brainchild.
2013-05-30 18:05:15
From: happy hippo
Just what he said if you mess around with the client then you are open to a hefty sueing
2013-05-30 21:30:40
From: Goatchees
OSBOT and TRIBOT of perfect examples of what Jagex will go after. They are making thousands of dollars of "selling" their product. Their Selling the exploits for Jagex's brainchild.
2013-05-30 23:06:49
From: Rincewind
Why not PB? They are literally making thousands.
2013-05-30 23:20:42
From: Brandon
Because the above isn't true. They cannot just "SUE" you for messing with the EOC client. They can only sue you if you actually de-obfuscate it and mess with it using the information you find. However, if you leave it obbed and use patterns for finding things and messing with it that way, there isn't too much they can go after you for. I'm sure they can still sue you but there isn't much grounds.
Also, since Tribot does not "MESS" with the EOC client directly, there isn't any way to really target them. The reason is because it isn't messing with the client but rather messing with your own graphics card and through a plugin too; they can't really say, "You're not allowed to intercept or touch data going to your own graphics card"..
Then again, it is jagex and it is reverse engineering and since there's a lot of quirky areas/rules around such a topic, almost anything really is possible.
2013-05-31 07:18:24
From: Peanuts
Creating anything and making profit from it at the expense of another companys work… could result in a law suit?
2013-05-31 12:08:56
2013-05-31 14:27:35
2013-05-31 15:51:19
From: Swaggar
in my opnion, jagex does not care. They just want to seem like they care. Otherwise everything would be sued.
2013-05-31 16:39:30
From: Kevin
Why would they sue people they can't win against? That's just a huge money sink and will only hurt them.
2013-05-31 18:57:45
From: Brandon
Because the above isn't true. They cannot just "SUE" you for messing with the EOC client. They can only sue you if you actually de-obfuscate it and mess with it using the information you find. However, if you leave it obbed and use patterns for finding things and messing with it that way, there isn't too much they can go after you for. I'm sure they can still sue you but there isn't much grounds.
Also, since Tribot does not "MESS" with the EOC client directly, there isn't any way to really target them. The reason is because it isn't messing with the client but rather messing with your own graphics card and through a plugin too; they can't really say, "You're not allowed to intercept or touch data going to your own graphics card"..
Then again, it is jagex and it is reverse engineering and since there's a lot of quirky areas/rules around such a topic, almost anything really is possible.
2013-05-31 19:10:11
From: Rincewind
I'm not talking down to PB, but they are one of the central hubs of goldfarming, botting and rwting. Is that not enough for Jagex to try and get them? Sorry but my knowledge of law is pretty poor.
2013-05-31 19:23:43
2013-06-01 04:21:37
From: Richard
IANAL, but from what I understand, the issues of digital rights legislation are incredibly messy, because the idea of digital property that doesn't really "exist" is around, the laws in place are actually really not up to scratch, and so it's very possible to find ways around the system.
But yes, I think the main issue with Jagex taking down large websites like PB is the monetary side of things. I really don't think they're in the position to take down big websites like PB, and they probably need the revenue from bots anyway.
2013-06-01 18:06:48
From: Raiden702
Basically, but it depends on specific cases. I mean, you never know the verdict.