meanderingmonk
2013-04-14 05:19:20
I'm curious if anyone wants to start a dialog about the following argument: Simulation Hypothesis
or more in-depth than wiki (original paper Bostrom wrote): Simulation Argument PDF
Keep these themes in mind when you read the above:
Matrix, The Truman Show, Gamer, Assassins Creed,etc.; all have some theme of a 'puppeteer' somehow controlling the actions of a 'puppet' in an alternate world (usually one generated completely by computers).
[LEFT](post-humans: cyborgs, nano-technology integrated into material body-form, inorganic computers acting as cells/etc)[/LEFT]
TLDR:
Cool, so basically one of the following scenarios are true (plz read article for more detail…)(best case of each proposition..):
One:[LEFT] we never make it to becoming post-humans because of any number of reasons (DOOM, war, famine, disease, mass gene-icide (think fking up genetics/etc..)"self-replicating nanobots capable of feeding on organic matter..")… and so because of the reason(s), we don't run any simulation of our ancestry.[/LEFT]
two: [LEFT]we've tried to run simulations, perhaps many simulations, almost an infinite amount–yet, cannot simulate enough times to create an accurate simulation of ancestry.[/LEFT]
three:[LEFT]we're actually in a computer simulation (i.e. RIGHT NOW). meaning that at least one post-human is alive now or will be in the future, and definitely succeeds in creating such a simulation of our beautiful ancestry..[/LEFT]
So what do you all think of that? :)
or more in-depth than wiki (original paper Bostrom wrote): Simulation Argument PDF
Keep these themes in mind when you read the above:
Matrix, The Truman Show, Gamer, Assassins Creed,etc.; all have some theme of a 'puppeteer' somehow controlling the actions of a 'puppet' in an alternate world (usually one generated completely by computers).
[LEFT](post-humans: cyborgs, nano-technology integrated into material body-form, inorganic computers acting as cells/etc)[/LEFT]
TLDR:
Cool, so basically one of the following scenarios are true (plz read article for more detail…)(best case of each proposition..):
One:[LEFT] we never make it to becoming post-humans because of any number of reasons (DOOM, war, famine, disease, mass gene-icide (think fking up genetics/etc..)"self-replicating nanobots capable of feeding on organic matter..")… and so because of the reason(s), we don't run any simulation of our ancestry.[/LEFT]
two: [LEFT]we've tried to run simulations, perhaps many simulations, almost an infinite amount–yet, cannot simulate enough times to create an accurate simulation of ancestry.[/LEFT]
three:[LEFT]we're actually in a computer simulation (i.e. RIGHT NOW). meaning that at least one post-human is alive now or will be in the future, and definitely succeeds in creating such a simulation of our beautiful ancestry..[/LEFT]
So what do you all think of that? :)